Co-design knowledge mobilization tools for universal accessibility in municipalities.

IF 1.3 Q3 REHABILITATION
Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences Pub Date : 2024-07-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fresc.2024.1331728
Maëlle Corcuff, Marie-Eve Lamontagne, François Routhier, Ernesto Morales
{"title":"Co-design knowledge mobilization tools for universal accessibility in municipalities.","authors":"Maëlle Corcuff, Marie-Eve Lamontagne, François Routhier, Ernesto Morales","doi":"10.3389/fresc.2024.1331728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Modern research teams are re-evaluating conventional methods with the aim of improving the usefulness of knowledge for users, focusing on the role of knowledge users in shaping innovation. In disability field, encouraging participatory research inherently involves diverse perspectives and inclusion, which aligns with the principles of universal accessibility. By actively involving individuals with various backgrounds, abilities, and needs in the research process, we can better understand and address the challenges faced in adopting universal accessibility. This approach ensures that solutions are more comprehensive, inclusive, and effectively cater to the needs of all individuals, fostering a more equitable and accessible environment for everyone. Despite municipal organizations mandating universal accessibility action plans, they lack tools for efficient implementation. The aim of this study was to develop knowledge mobilization tools tailored to a specific municipal context in Quebec, Canada, to facilitate the implementation of universal accessibility measures by municipal employees.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The co-design process employed in this study was organized into four distinct stages, following the Morales model: (1) Exploration (2) Co-Design (3) Validation (4) Development.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stages one and two highlighted the employees' lack of awareness about universal accessibility issues and their need to have more information and resources about how universal accessibility is encountered in their work. A steering committee co-designed three video vignettes about universal accessibility, the city's action plan and measures included in it.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The co-design approach used in this study allowed us to observe the non-linear nature of partnership research with an organization as complex as a municipality. Our study shows significant advantages of collaboration between the municipal sector and research.</p>","PeriodicalId":73102,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11247021/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2024.1331728","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Modern research teams are re-evaluating conventional methods with the aim of improving the usefulness of knowledge for users, focusing on the role of knowledge users in shaping innovation. In disability field, encouraging participatory research inherently involves diverse perspectives and inclusion, which aligns with the principles of universal accessibility. By actively involving individuals with various backgrounds, abilities, and needs in the research process, we can better understand and address the challenges faced in adopting universal accessibility. This approach ensures that solutions are more comprehensive, inclusive, and effectively cater to the needs of all individuals, fostering a more equitable and accessible environment for everyone. Despite municipal organizations mandating universal accessibility action plans, they lack tools for efficient implementation. The aim of this study was to develop knowledge mobilization tools tailored to a specific municipal context in Quebec, Canada, to facilitate the implementation of universal accessibility measures by municipal employees.

Methods: The co-design process employed in this study was organized into four distinct stages, following the Morales model: (1) Exploration (2) Co-Design (3) Validation (4) Development.

Results: Stages one and two highlighted the employees' lack of awareness about universal accessibility issues and their need to have more information and resources about how universal accessibility is encountered in their work. A steering committee co-designed three video vignettes about universal accessibility, the city's action plan and measures included in it.

Discussion: The co-design approach used in this study allowed us to observe the non-linear nature of partnership research with an organization as complex as a municipality. Our study shows significant advantages of collaboration between the municipal sector and research.

共同设计知识动员工具,促进城市无障碍环境的普及。
导言:现代研究团队正在重新评估传统方法,旨在提高知识对用户的实用性,重点关注知识用户在创新中的作用。在残疾人领域,鼓励参与式研究本质上涉及多元化视角和包容性,这与普遍无障碍原则相一致。通过让具有不同背景、能力和需求的个人积极参与研究过程,我们可以更好地理解和应对在采用通用无障碍技术时所面临的挑战。这种方法可以确保解决方案更全面、更具包容性,并有效满足所有人的需求,为每个人营造一个更公平、更无障碍的环境。尽管市政组织规定了通用无障碍行动计划,但它们缺乏有效实施的工具。本研究的目的是针对加拿大魁北克省特定的市政环境开发知识动员工具,以促进市政雇员实施无障碍通行措施:本研究采用的共同设计过程按照莫拉莱斯模式分为四个不同阶段:(1)探索(2)共同设计(3)验证(4)开发:结果:第一和第二阶段强调了员工对通用无障碍问题缺乏认识,他们需要更多的信息和资源来了解通用无障碍是如何在工作中遇到的。指导委员会共同设计了三个关于无障碍环境、城市行动计划及其措施的视频短片:本研究中采用的共同设计方法使我们能够观察到与像市政当局这样复杂的组织开展合作研究的非线性性质。我们的研究表明,市政部门与研究机构之间的合作具有显著优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信