Nicoleta Serban PhD, Simin Ma PhD, Jiaxi Yu BS, Annalea Anderson MS, Katrine Pospichel MS, Shalini R. Solipuram MS, Scott L. Tomar DMD, MPH
{"title":"Dental care access for children in the United States","authors":"Nicoleta Serban PhD, Simin Ma PhD, Jiaxi Yu BS, Annalea Anderson MS, Katrine Pospichel MS, Shalini R. Solipuram MS, Scott L. Tomar DMD, MPH","doi":"10.1111/jphd.12635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate access to dental care for children in the United States.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The study population included children in 48 states and the District of Columbia. Using multiple data sources, dental care access was estimated at the community level by matching dental care supply and demand using mathematical modeling accounting for access constraints. Outcome measures included percent-met demand, travel distance, and percentage of underserved and unserved communities. Multiple scenarios to improve Medicaid/CHIP participation of dentists were evaluated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Medicaid-insured and CHIP-insured children exhibited lower access compared to those privately insured. The percent-met demand was lower than 50% for Medicaid-insured children and CHIP-insured children for 42 and 34 states, respectively. Percent-met demand was higher than 50% for private-insured children except for Texas and West Virginia. Increasing Medicaid/CHIP participation of dentists resulted in improving access for public-insured children. At 100% Medicaid/CHIP participation, all states exhibited different degrees of percent-met demand increase for publicly insured children, from 7% to 46%. The percent-met demand across all children ranged in 23.8%–82.9% under 70% participation rate versus 22%–83% under 100% participation rate. No single participation rate improved access for all children uniformly across all states.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This study found that dental care access was lower for children with public insurance than those with private access across all states, although states responded differently to changes in Medicaid/CHIP participation. Increasing access for children with public insurance would reduce disparities, but overall children's access to dental care would be better improved by expanding the oral health workforce.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16913,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health dentistry","volume":"84 4","pages":"351-361"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11619532/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of public health dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jphd.12635","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
To evaluate access to dental care for children in the United States.
Methods
The study population included children in 48 states and the District of Columbia. Using multiple data sources, dental care access was estimated at the community level by matching dental care supply and demand using mathematical modeling accounting for access constraints. Outcome measures included percent-met demand, travel distance, and percentage of underserved and unserved communities. Multiple scenarios to improve Medicaid/CHIP participation of dentists were evaluated.
Results
Medicaid-insured and CHIP-insured children exhibited lower access compared to those privately insured. The percent-met demand was lower than 50% for Medicaid-insured children and CHIP-insured children for 42 and 34 states, respectively. Percent-met demand was higher than 50% for private-insured children except for Texas and West Virginia. Increasing Medicaid/CHIP participation of dentists resulted in improving access for public-insured children. At 100% Medicaid/CHIP participation, all states exhibited different degrees of percent-met demand increase for publicly insured children, from 7% to 46%. The percent-met demand across all children ranged in 23.8%–82.9% under 70% participation rate versus 22%–83% under 100% participation rate. No single participation rate improved access for all children uniformly across all states.
Conclusions
This study found that dental care access was lower for children with public insurance than those with private access across all states, although states responded differently to changes in Medicaid/CHIP participation. Increasing access for children with public insurance would reduce disparities, but overall children's access to dental care would be better improved by expanding the oral health workforce.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Public Health Dentistry is devoted to the advancement of public health dentistry through the exploration of related research, practice, and policy developments. Three main types of articles are published: original research articles that provide a significant contribution to knowledge in the breadth of dental public health, including oral epidemiology, dental health services, the behavioral sciences, and the public health practice areas of assessment, policy development, and assurance; methods articles that report the development and testing of new approaches to research design, data collection and analysis, or the delivery of public health services; and review articles that synthesize previous research in the discipline and provide guidance to others conducting research as well as to policy makers, managers, and other dental public health practitioners.