Beta-blocker initiation under dobutamine infusion in acute advanced heart failure: a target trial emulation with observational data.

European heart journal open Pub Date : 2024-07-04 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1093/ehjopen/oeae054
Yuichiro Mori, Kosuke Inoue, Hiroyuki Sato, Takahiro Tsushima, Shingo Fukuma
{"title":"Beta-blocker initiation under dobutamine infusion in acute advanced heart failure: a target trial emulation with observational data.","authors":"Yuichiro Mori, Kosuke Inoue, Hiroyuki Sato, Takahiro Tsushima, Shingo Fukuma","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeae054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>In patients with advanced heart failure requiring dobutamine infusion, it is usually recommended to initiate beta-blockers after weaning from dobutamine. However, beta-blockers are sometimes initiated under dobutamine infusion in a real-world scenario. The association between such early beta-blocker initiation with clinical outcomes is unknown. Therefore, this study investigates the association between initiating beta-blockers under dobutamine infusion and survival outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>This observational study with a multicentre inpatient-care database emulated a pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the beta-blocker initiation strategy. First, 1151 patients on dobutamine and not on beta-blockers on the day of heart failure admission (Day 0) were identified. Among 1095 who met eligibility criteria, patients who were eventually initiated beta-blockers under dobutamine infusion by Day 7 (early initiation strategy) were 1:1 matched to those who were not initiated (conservative strategy). The methods of cloning, censoring, and weighting were applied to emulate the target trial. Patients were followed up for up to 30 days. The primary outcome was all-cause death. Among 780 matched patients (median age, 81 years), the adjusted hazard ratio was 1.11 (95% confidence interval 0.75-1.64, <i>P</i> = 0.59) for the early initiation strategy. The estimated 30-day all-cause mortalities in the early initiation strategy and the conservative strategy were 19.3% (10.6-30.7) and 16.2% (9.2-25.3), respectively. The results were consistent when we used different days to determine strategies (i.e. 5 and 9) instead of 7 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present observational study emulating a pragmatic RCT found no positive or negative association between beta-blocker initiation under dobutamine infusion and overall survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":"4 4","pages":"oeae054"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11247169/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oeae054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: In patients with advanced heart failure requiring dobutamine infusion, it is usually recommended to initiate beta-blockers after weaning from dobutamine. However, beta-blockers are sometimes initiated under dobutamine infusion in a real-world scenario. The association between such early beta-blocker initiation with clinical outcomes is unknown. Therefore, this study investigates the association between initiating beta-blockers under dobutamine infusion and survival outcomes.

Methods and results: This observational study with a multicentre inpatient-care database emulated a pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the beta-blocker initiation strategy. First, 1151 patients on dobutamine and not on beta-blockers on the day of heart failure admission (Day 0) were identified. Among 1095 who met eligibility criteria, patients who were eventually initiated beta-blockers under dobutamine infusion by Day 7 (early initiation strategy) were 1:1 matched to those who were not initiated (conservative strategy). The methods of cloning, censoring, and weighting were applied to emulate the target trial. Patients were followed up for up to 30 days. The primary outcome was all-cause death. Among 780 matched patients (median age, 81 years), the adjusted hazard ratio was 1.11 (95% confidence interval 0.75-1.64, P = 0.59) for the early initiation strategy. The estimated 30-day all-cause mortalities in the early initiation strategy and the conservative strategy were 19.3% (10.6-30.7) and 16.2% (9.2-25.3), respectively. The results were consistent when we used different days to determine strategies (i.e. 5 and 9) instead of 7 days.

Conclusion: The present observational study emulating a pragmatic RCT found no positive or negative association between beta-blocker initiation under dobutamine infusion and overall survival.

急性晚期心力衰竭患者在输注多巴酚丁胺的情况下开始使用β-受体阻滞剂:利用观察数据模拟目标试验。
目的:对于需要输注多巴酚丁胺的晚期心衰患者,通常建议在停用多巴酚丁胺后开始使用β-受体阻滞剂。然而,在现实世界中,有时会在输注多巴酚丁胺的情况下开始使用β-受体阻滞剂。这种过早使用β-受体阻滞剂与临床结果之间的关系尚不清楚。因此,本研究调查了在多巴酚丁胺输注下启动β-受体阻滞剂与生存结果之间的关系:这项观察性研究利用多中心住院病人护理数据库,模仿了β-受体阻滞剂启动策略的实用随机对照试验(RCT)。首先,研究人员确定了 1151 名在心衰入院当天(第 0 天)使用多巴酚丁胺但未使用β-受体阻滞剂的患者。在符合资格标准的 1095 名患者中,第 7 天前最终在多巴酚丁胺输注下开始使用贝塔受体阻滞剂的患者(早期启动策略)与未开始使用贝塔受体阻滞剂的患者(保守策略)进行 1:1 匹配。采用克隆、删减和加权等方法来模拟目标试验。对患者进行了长达 30 天的随访。主要结果是全因死亡。在 780 名匹配的患者(中位年龄 81 岁)中,早期启动策略的调整后危险比为 1.11(95% 置信区间 0.75-1.64,P = 0.59)。早期启动策略和保守策略估计的 30 天全因死亡率分别为 19.3% (10.6-30.7) 和 16.2% (9.2-25.3)。当我们使用不同天数(即 5 天和 9 天)而不是 7 天来确定策略时,结果是一致的:本观察性研究模仿了一项务实的 RCT,发现在多巴酚丁胺输注下开始使用β-受体阻滞剂与总生存率之间没有正相关或负相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信