Deaths with COVID-19 and from all-causes following first-ever SARS-CoV-2 infection in individuals with preexisting mental disorders: A national cohort study from Czechia.

IF 15.8 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine
PLoS Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-15 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1004422
Tomáš Formánek, Libor Potočár, Katrin Wolfova, Hana Melicharová, Karolína Mladá, Anna Wiedemann, Danni Chen, Pavel Mohr, Petr Winkler, Peter B Jones, Jiří Jarkovský
{"title":"Deaths with COVID-19 and from all-causes following first-ever SARS-CoV-2 infection in individuals with preexisting mental disorders: A national cohort study from Czechia.","authors":"Tomáš Formánek, Libor Potočár, Katrin Wolfova, Hana Melicharová, Karolína Mladá, Anna Wiedemann, Danni Chen, Pavel Mohr, Petr Winkler, Peter B Jones, Jiří Jarkovský","doi":"10.1371/journal.pmed.1004422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence suggests reduced survival rates following Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in people with preexisting mental disorders, especially psychotic disorders, before the broad introduction of vaccines. It remains unknown whether this elevated mortality risk persisted at later phases of the pandemic and when accounting for the confounding effect of vaccination uptake and clinically recorded physical comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Methods and findings: </strong>We used data from Czech national health registers to identify first-ever serologically confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections in 5 epochs related to different phases of the pandemic: 1st March 2020 to 30th September 2020, 1st October 2020 to 26th December 2020, 27th December 2020 to 31st March 2021, 1st April 2021 to 31st October 2021, and 1st November 2021 to 29th February 2022. In these people, we ascertained cases of mental disorders using 2 approaches: (1) per the International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision (ICD-10) diagnostic codes for substance use, psychotic, affective, and anxiety disorders; and (2) per ICD-10 diagnostic codes for the above mental disorders coupled with a prescription for anxiolytics/hypnotics/sedatives, antidepressants, antipsychotics, or stimulants per the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification codes. We matched individuals with preexisting mental disorders with counterparts who had no recorded mental disorders on age, sex, month and year of infection, vaccination status, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). We assessed deaths with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and from all-causes in the time period of 28 and 60 days following the infection using stratified Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for matching variables and additional confounders. The number of individuals in matched-cohorts ranged from 1,328 in epoch 1 to 854,079 in epoch 5. The proportion of females ranged from 34.98% in people diagnosed with substance use disorders in epoch 3 to 71.16% in individuals diagnosed and treated with anxiety disorders in epoch 5. The mean age ranged from 40.97 years (standard deviation [SD] = 15.69 years) in individuals diagnosed with substance use disorders in epoch 5 to 56.04 years (SD = 18.37 years) in people diagnosed with psychotic disorders in epoch 2. People diagnosed with or diagnosed and treated for psychotic disorders had a consistently elevated risk of dying with COVID-19 in epochs 2, 3, 4, and 5, with adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) ranging from 1.46 [95% confidence intervals (CIs), 1.18, 1.79] to 1.93 [95% CIs, 1.12, 3.32]. This patient group demonstrated also a consistently elevated risk of all-cause mortality in epochs 2, 3, 4, and 5 (aHR from 1.43 [95% CIs, 1.23, 1.66] to 1.99 [95% CIs, 1.25, 3.16]). The models could not be reliably fit for psychotic disorders in epoch 1. People diagnosed with substance use disorders had an increased risk of all-cause mortality 28 days postinfection in epoch 3, 4, and 5 (aHR from 1.30 [95% CIs, 1.14, 1.47] to 1.59 [95% CIs, 1.19, 2.12]) and 60 days postinfection in epoch 2, 3, 4, and 5 (aHR from 1.22 [95% CIs, 1.08, 1.38] to 1.52 [95% CIs, 1.16, 1.98]). Cases ascertained based on diagnosis of substance use disorders and treatment had increased risk of all-cause mortality in epoch 2, 3, 4, and 5 (aHR from 1.22 [95% CIs, 1.03, 1.43] to 1.91 [95% CIs, 1.25, 2.91]). The models could not be reliably fit for substance use disorders in epoch 1. In contrast to these, people diagnosed with anxiety disorders had a decreased risk of death with COVID-19 in epoch 2, 3, and 5 (aHR from 0.78 [95% CIs, 0.69, 0.88] to 0.89 [95% CIs, 0.81, 0.98]) and all-cause mortality in epoch 2, 3, 4, and 5 (aHR from 0.83 [95% CIs, 0.77, 0.90] to 0.88 [95% CIs, 0.83, 0.93]). People diagnosed and treated for affective disorders had a decreased risk of both death with COVID-19 and from all-causes in epoch 3 (aHR from 0.87 [95% CIs, 0.79, 0.96] to 0.90 [95% CIs, 0.83, 0.99]), but demonstrated broadly null effects in other epochs. Given the unavailability of data on a number of potentially influential confounders, particularly body mass index, tobacco smoking status, and socioeconomic status, part of the detected associations might be due to residual confounding.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>People with preexisting psychotic, and, less robustly, substance use disorders demonstrated a persistently elevated risk of death following SARS-CoV-2 infection throughout the pandemic. While it cannot be ruled out that part of the detected associations is due to residual confounding, this excess mortality cannot be fully explained by lower vaccination uptake and more clinically recorded physical comorbidities in these patient groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":49008,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Medicine","volume":"21 7","pages":"e1004422"},"PeriodicalIF":15.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11285938/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004422","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evidence suggests reduced survival rates following Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in people with preexisting mental disorders, especially psychotic disorders, before the broad introduction of vaccines. It remains unknown whether this elevated mortality risk persisted at later phases of the pandemic and when accounting for the confounding effect of vaccination uptake and clinically recorded physical comorbidities.

Methods and findings: We used data from Czech national health registers to identify first-ever serologically confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections in 5 epochs related to different phases of the pandemic: 1st March 2020 to 30th September 2020, 1st October 2020 to 26th December 2020, 27th December 2020 to 31st March 2021, 1st April 2021 to 31st October 2021, and 1st November 2021 to 29th February 2022. In these people, we ascertained cases of mental disorders using 2 approaches: (1) per the International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision (ICD-10) diagnostic codes for substance use, psychotic, affective, and anxiety disorders; and (2) per ICD-10 diagnostic codes for the above mental disorders coupled with a prescription for anxiolytics/hypnotics/sedatives, antidepressants, antipsychotics, or stimulants per the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification codes. We matched individuals with preexisting mental disorders with counterparts who had no recorded mental disorders on age, sex, month and year of infection, vaccination status, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). We assessed deaths with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and from all-causes in the time period of 28 and 60 days following the infection using stratified Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for matching variables and additional confounders. The number of individuals in matched-cohorts ranged from 1,328 in epoch 1 to 854,079 in epoch 5. The proportion of females ranged from 34.98% in people diagnosed with substance use disorders in epoch 3 to 71.16% in individuals diagnosed and treated with anxiety disorders in epoch 5. The mean age ranged from 40.97 years (standard deviation [SD] = 15.69 years) in individuals diagnosed with substance use disorders in epoch 5 to 56.04 years (SD = 18.37 years) in people diagnosed with psychotic disorders in epoch 2. People diagnosed with or diagnosed and treated for psychotic disorders had a consistently elevated risk of dying with COVID-19 in epochs 2, 3, 4, and 5, with adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) ranging from 1.46 [95% confidence intervals (CIs), 1.18, 1.79] to 1.93 [95% CIs, 1.12, 3.32]. This patient group demonstrated also a consistently elevated risk of all-cause mortality in epochs 2, 3, 4, and 5 (aHR from 1.43 [95% CIs, 1.23, 1.66] to 1.99 [95% CIs, 1.25, 3.16]). The models could not be reliably fit for psychotic disorders in epoch 1. People diagnosed with substance use disorders had an increased risk of all-cause mortality 28 days postinfection in epoch 3, 4, and 5 (aHR from 1.30 [95% CIs, 1.14, 1.47] to 1.59 [95% CIs, 1.19, 2.12]) and 60 days postinfection in epoch 2, 3, 4, and 5 (aHR from 1.22 [95% CIs, 1.08, 1.38] to 1.52 [95% CIs, 1.16, 1.98]). Cases ascertained based on diagnosis of substance use disorders and treatment had increased risk of all-cause mortality in epoch 2, 3, 4, and 5 (aHR from 1.22 [95% CIs, 1.03, 1.43] to 1.91 [95% CIs, 1.25, 2.91]). The models could not be reliably fit for substance use disorders in epoch 1. In contrast to these, people diagnosed with anxiety disorders had a decreased risk of death with COVID-19 in epoch 2, 3, and 5 (aHR from 0.78 [95% CIs, 0.69, 0.88] to 0.89 [95% CIs, 0.81, 0.98]) and all-cause mortality in epoch 2, 3, 4, and 5 (aHR from 0.83 [95% CIs, 0.77, 0.90] to 0.88 [95% CIs, 0.83, 0.93]). People diagnosed and treated for affective disorders had a decreased risk of both death with COVID-19 and from all-causes in epoch 3 (aHR from 0.87 [95% CIs, 0.79, 0.96] to 0.90 [95% CIs, 0.83, 0.99]), but demonstrated broadly null effects in other epochs. Given the unavailability of data on a number of potentially influential confounders, particularly body mass index, tobacco smoking status, and socioeconomic status, part of the detected associations might be due to residual confounding.

Conclusions: People with preexisting psychotic, and, less robustly, substance use disorders demonstrated a persistently elevated risk of death following SARS-CoV-2 infection throughout the pandemic. While it cannot be ruled out that part of the detected associations is due to residual confounding, this excess mortality cannot be fully explained by lower vaccination uptake and more clinically recorded physical comorbidities in these patient groups.

首次感染SARS-CoV-2后因COVID-19死亡和因其他原因死亡的已有精神障碍的人:捷克全国队列研究。
背景:有证据表明,在广泛使用疫苗之前,已有精神障碍(尤其是精神病)的人感染严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)后存活率降低。在考虑疫苗接种率和临床记录的身体合并症的混杂效应后,这种死亡率升高的风险是否会在大流行后期持续存在,目前仍是未知数:我们利用捷克全国健康登记册中的数据,确定了首次经血清学确诊的 SARS-CoV-2 感染者,这五个时间段与大流行的不同阶段相关:2020 年 3 月 1 日至 2020 年 9 月 30 日、2020 年 10 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 26 日、2020 年 12 月 27 日至 2021 年 3 月 31 日、2021 年 4 月 1 日至 2021 年 10 月 31 日以及 2021 年 11 月 1 日至 2022 年 2 月 29 日。在这些人群中,我们采用两种方法确定精神障碍病例:(1) 根据《国际疾病分类》第 10 次修订版(ICD-10)的诊断代码确定药物使用、精神病、情感和焦虑障碍;(2) 根据《国际疾病分类》第 10 次修订版的诊断代码确定上述精神障碍,并根据解剖学治疗化学(ATC)分类代码确定抗焦虑药/催眠药/镇静剂、抗抑郁药、抗精神病药或兴奋剂的处方。我们根据年龄、性别、感染年月、疫苗接种情况和查尔森合并症指数(CCI),将已有精神障碍的患者与没有精神障碍记录的患者进行配对。我们使用分层考克斯比例危险模型评估了感染冠状病毒病 2019(COVID-19)后 28 天和 60 天内的死亡人数以及所有原因的死亡人数,并对匹配变量和其他混杂因素进行了调整。配对队列中的人数从第 1 个纪元的 1,328 人到第 5 个纪元的 854,079 人不等。女性比例从第 3 个纪元中被诊断为药物使用障碍的 34.98% 到第 5 个纪元中被诊断为焦虑症并接受治疗的 71.16%。平均年龄从第五纪元药物使用障碍患者的 40.97 岁(标准差 [SD] = 15.69 岁)到第二纪元精神病患者的 56.04 岁(标准差 = 18.37 岁)不等。在第 2、第 3、第 4 和第 5 个纪元中,被诊断为或被诊断并接受治疗的精神病患者因 COVID-19 而死亡的风险持续升高,调整后的危险比 (aHR) 为 1.46 [95% 置信区间 (CI),1.18, 1.79] 至 1.93 [95% CI,1.12, 3.32]。该患者组在第 2、3、4 和 5 个阶段的全因死亡风险也持续升高(aHR 从 1.43 [95% CIs, 1.23, 1.66] 到 1.99 [95% CIs, 1.25, 3.16])。模型无法可靠地拟合第一纪元的精神病性障碍。在第 3、第 4 和第 5 阶段,被诊断出有药物使用障碍的人在感染后 28 天出现全因死亡的风险增加(第 3、第 4 和第 5 阶段的风险从 1.22 [95% CIs, 1.08, 1.38] 增加到 1.52 [95% CIs, 1.16, 1.98])。根据药物使用障碍诊断和治疗确定的病例在第 2、3、4 和 5 个阶段的全因死亡风险增加(aHR 从 1.22 [95% CIs, 1.03, 1.43] 到 1.91 [95% CIs, 1.25, 2.91])。在第一纪元,模型无法可靠地拟合药物使用障碍。与此形成鲜明对比的是,被诊断为焦虑症的患者在第 2、3 和 5 个纪元中使用 COVID-19 的死亡风险降低(aHR 从 0.78 [95% CIs, 0.69, 0.88] 降至 0.89 [95% CIs, 0.81, 0.98]),在第 2、3、4 和 5 个纪元中使用 COVID-19 的全因死亡风险降低(aHR 从 0.83 [95% CIs, 0.77, 0.90] 降至 0.88 [95% CIs, 0.83, 0.93])。确诊并接受治疗的情感障碍患者因COVID-19而死亡的风险以及在第3个阶段因所有原因而死亡的风险均有所降低(aHR从0.87 [95% CIs, 0.79, 0.96]到0.90 [95% CIs, 0.83, 0.99]),但在其他阶段的影响大致为零。由于缺乏一些潜在影响因素的数据,特别是体重指数、吸烟状况和社会经济状况,部分检测到的关联可能是由于残余混杂因素造成的:结论:在整个大流行期间,感染 SARS-CoV-2 之前就患有精神病和药物使用障碍的人群的死亡风险持续升高。虽然不能排除部分检测到的关联是由于残余混杂因素造成的,但这些患者群体中较低的疫苗接种率和临床记录较多的身体合并症并不能完全解释这种超常死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS Medicine
PLoS Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
0.60%
发文量
227
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: PLOS Medicine is a prominent platform for discussing and researching global health challenges. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including biomedical, environmental, social, and political factors affecting health. It prioritizes articles that contribute to clinical practice, health policy, or a better understanding of pathophysiology, ultimately aiming to improve health outcomes across different settings. The journal is unwavering in its commitment to uphold the highest ethical standards in medical publishing. This includes actively managing and disclosing any conflicts of interest related to reporting, reviewing, and publishing. PLOS Medicine promotes transparency in the entire review and publication process. The journal also encourages data sharing and encourages the reuse of published work. Additionally, authors retain copyright for their work, and the publication is made accessible through Open Access with no restrictions on availability and dissemination. PLOS Medicine takes measures to avoid conflicts of interest associated with advertising drugs and medical devices or engaging in the exclusive sale of reprints.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信