Using Concept Mapping to Identify Community Partners' and Researchers' Perceptions of Social Justice: A Path Toward Eliminating Chronic Disease Disparities.

IF 2.6 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Health Equity Pub Date : 2024-06-27 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1089/heq.2023.0230
Eric K Soule, Dina M Jones, Nakita Lovelady, Luke Thomas, Ruofei Du, Theresa E Prewitt, Elizabeth Taylor, Sydney Baker, Mignonne C Guy, Carol E Cornell, Pebbles Fagan
{"title":"Using Concept Mapping to Identify Community Partners' and Researchers' Perceptions of Social Justice: A Path Toward Eliminating Chronic Disease Disparities.","authors":"Eric K Soule, Dina M Jones, Nakita Lovelady, Luke Thomas, Ruofei Du, Theresa E Prewitt, Elizabeth Taylor, Sydney Baker, Mignonne C Guy, Carol E Cornell, Pebbles Fagan","doi":"10.1089/heq.2023.0230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A social justice framework can be used to inform healthy equity-focused research, and operationalizing social justice can inform strategic planning for research and practice models. This study aimed to develop a working definition of social justice based on input from a diverse group of collaborators to better inform the work conducted within the Center for Research, Health, and Social Justice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A concept mapping study was conducted from March to May 2022. A prompt designed to elicit social justice themes was developed (phase 1). At a study website, participants brainstormed statements that represented their definition of social justice (phase 2). Participants then sorted statements based on similarity and rated statements on importance (phase 3). Multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analysis were used to identify nonoverlapping thematic clusters of statements (phase 4). Models were reviewed for best fit, and clusters were assigned names based on theme (phase 5).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (<i>n</i> = 49) generated 52 unique statements that were sorted into 5 clusters describing social justice themes. Clusters included (1) Empathy, Awareness, and Understanding (<i>n</i> = 11); (2) Education and Systems Change (<i>n</i> = 10); (3) Policy Design and Implementation (<i>n</i> = 9); (4) Equity and Leveling the Playing Field (<i>n</i> = 11); and (5) Access to Services and Fair Living Standard (<i>n</i> = 11). High mean cluster ratings ranging from 5.22 to 6.02 out of 7 indicated all clusters were rated as being very important aspects of social justice.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These data can guide the restructuring of research ecosystems that help eliminate race- and place-based health disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":36602,"journal":{"name":"Health Equity","volume":"8 1","pages":"426-436"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11249129/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Equity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/heq.2023.0230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A social justice framework can be used to inform healthy equity-focused research, and operationalizing social justice can inform strategic planning for research and practice models. This study aimed to develop a working definition of social justice based on input from a diverse group of collaborators to better inform the work conducted within the Center for Research, Health, and Social Justice.

Methods: A concept mapping study was conducted from March to May 2022. A prompt designed to elicit social justice themes was developed (phase 1). At a study website, participants brainstormed statements that represented their definition of social justice (phase 2). Participants then sorted statements based on similarity and rated statements on importance (phase 3). Multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analysis were used to identify nonoverlapping thematic clusters of statements (phase 4). Models were reviewed for best fit, and clusters were assigned names based on theme (phase 5).

Results: Participants (n = 49) generated 52 unique statements that were sorted into 5 clusters describing social justice themes. Clusters included (1) Empathy, Awareness, and Understanding (n = 11); (2) Education and Systems Change (n = 10); (3) Policy Design and Implementation (n = 9); (4) Equity and Leveling the Playing Field (n = 11); and (5) Access to Services and Fair Living Standard (n = 11). High mean cluster ratings ranging from 5.22 to 6.02 out of 7 indicated all clusters were rated as being very important aspects of social justice.

Conclusions: These data can guide the restructuring of research ecosystems that help eliminate race- and place-based health disparities.

利用概念图确定社区合作伙伴和研究人员对社会正义的看法:消除慢性病差异之路。
背景:社会公正框架可用于以健康公平为重点的研究,而社会公正的可操作性可为研究和实践模式的战略规划提供信息。本研究旨在根据不同合作者的意见,为社会公正制定一个可行的定义,以便更好地指导研究、健康和社会公正中心的工作:方法:2022 年 3 月至 5 月进行了一项概念绘图研究。制定了一个旨在激发社会正义主题的提示(第 1 阶段)。在一个研究网站上,参与者集思广益,提出了代表其社会正义定义的陈述(第 2 阶段)。然后,参与者根据相似度对陈述进行排序,并对陈述的重要性进行评分(第 3 阶段)。使用多维标度和分层聚类分析来确定不重叠的陈述主题聚类(第 4 阶段)。对模型进行审核,以确定最佳拟合度,并根据主题为聚类命名(第 5 阶段):结果:参与者(n = 49)产生了 52 个独特的陈述,这些陈述被分为 5 个描述社会公正主题的聚类。组群包括:(1) 同情、认识和理解(n = 11);(2) 教育和制度变革(n = 10);(3) 政策设计和实施(n = 9);(4) 公平和公平竞争(n = 11);以及 (5) 获得服务和公平生活标准(n = 11)。各组的平均评分很高,从 5.22 到 6.02(满分 7 分),表明所有组都被评为社会公正的非常重要的方面:这些数据可以指导研究生态系统的重组,帮助消除基于种族和地方的健康差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Equity
Health Equity Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
97
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信