Compassionate Curiosity: Mitigating the Effects of Bias Through Motivational Interviewing.

IF 2.6 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Health Equity Pub Date : 2024-06-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1089/heq.2024.0054
Paul J Hershberger, Dean A Bricker, Angie Castle, Timothy N Crawford, Stacy R Flowers, Alexandria L Goff, Katharine Conway
{"title":"Compassionate Curiosity: Mitigating the Effects of Bias Through Motivational Interviewing.","authors":"Paul J Hershberger, Dean A Bricker, Angie Castle, Timothy N Crawford, Stacy R Flowers, Alexandria L Goff, Katharine Conway","doi":"10.1089/heq.2024.0054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is strong evidence that the implicit biases of health care professionals affect the treatment of patients, and that minority and other marginalized patients are disproportionately harmed. Assumptions made about patient knowledge or lack thereof function as judgments that are prone to bias, which then affect the education and advice imposed upon patients. We review how the motivational interviewing (MI) approach to patient engagement includes components of evidence-based bias-mitigating strategies, such as understanding circumstances from the patient's point of view, and therefore we propose that the MI approach can reduce the impact of bias in patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":36602,"journal":{"name":"Health Equity","volume":"8 1","pages":"351-354"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11249126/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Equity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/heq.2024.0054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is strong evidence that the implicit biases of health care professionals affect the treatment of patients, and that minority and other marginalized patients are disproportionately harmed. Assumptions made about patient knowledge or lack thereof function as judgments that are prone to bias, which then affect the education and advice imposed upon patients. We review how the motivational interviewing (MI) approach to patient engagement includes components of evidence-based bias-mitigating strategies, such as understanding circumstances from the patient's point of view, and therefore we propose that the MI approach can reduce the impact of bias in patient care.

富有同情心的好奇心:通过动机访谈减轻偏见的影响。
有确凿证据表明,医护人员的隐性偏见会影响对患者的治疗,而少数群体和其他边缘化患者受到的伤害尤为严重。对患者是否了解相关知识所做的假设是容易产生偏见的判断,进而影响对患者的教育和建议。我们回顾了患者参与的动机面谈(MI)方法是如何包含以证据为基础的减少偏见策略的组成部分的,例如从患者的角度理解情况,因此我们提出动机面谈方法可以减少偏见在患者护理中的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Equity
Health Equity Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
97
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信