To Evaluate Efficiency of Various Coronary Artery Disease Risk Scores With Traditional Risk Factors in Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography.

IF 0.7 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Journal of the Saudi Heart Association Pub Date : 2024-07-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.37616/2212-5043.1386
Sharma Kamal, Panwar Jasraj, Patel Krutika, Parmar Devratsinh, Kalyani Maulik, Dhorajiya Dixit
{"title":"To Evaluate Efficiency of Various Coronary Artery Disease Risk Scores With Traditional Risk Factors in Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography.","authors":"Sharma Kamal, Panwar Jasraj, Patel Krutika, Parmar Devratsinh, Kalyani Maulik, Dhorajiya Dixit","doi":"10.37616/2212-5043.1386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze and compare various cardiovascular disease risk scores in Western Indian patients undergoing Coronary angiogram (CAG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective cross-sectional study, 1213 patients who underwent conventional coronary angiography; clinical risk profile and biochemical investigations were evaluated prior to undergoing CAG. Apart from the demographic information, 10-year absolute risk of having a major cardiovascular event (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction or stroke) was calculated for each patient using various available Traditional Risk Scores (TRS). The population was divided in low, intermediate and high-risk categories for each of these scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Traditional cardiovascular risk factors like hypertension (41.8%) and diabetes mellitus-II (26.9%) were the two most prevalent risk factors in our study population. A higher risk value for all these TRS was more likely to be associated with obstructive coronary artery disease (OCAD) on CAG. Patients with high risk (≥20% for 10-year) QRESEARCH (QRISK3) score category had higher number of patients with obstructive CAD (49.6%) as compared to high risk category of risk score for those with high Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score (46.6%) or risk Framingham (FRS CHD) score (29.2%) and risk atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) score (30.1%) (P < 0.0001). A higher TRS was more likely to be associated with obstructive CAD, with the highest predictability being with QRISK3 (QRISK3 score 60.9%, GRACE score 54.9%, FRS-CHD score 34% and ASCVD score 42.1% respectively; P < 0.0001). A substantial study population (27.4%) cannot be identified using any of these TRS and hence a need of indigenous or modified risk scores is proposed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>QRISK3 score was most efficacious for predicting obstructive CAD in our Indian study population on CAG. A higher risk score also correlated with the number of vessels involved on coronary angiogram. A substantial obstructive CAD patient could not be identified using traditional risk scores hence need for an indigenous or modified score.</p>","PeriodicalId":17319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Saudi Heart Association","volume":"36 2","pages":"128-136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11249062/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Saudi Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37616/2212-5043.1386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To analyze and compare various cardiovascular disease risk scores in Western Indian patients undergoing Coronary angiogram (CAG).

Methods: In this prospective cross-sectional study, 1213 patients who underwent conventional coronary angiography; clinical risk profile and biochemical investigations were evaluated prior to undergoing CAG. Apart from the demographic information, 10-year absolute risk of having a major cardiovascular event (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction or stroke) was calculated for each patient using various available Traditional Risk Scores (TRS). The population was divided in low, intermediate and high-risk categories for each of these scores.

Results: Traditional cardiovascular risk factors like hypertension (41.8%) and diabetes mellitus-II (26.9%) were the two most prevalent risk factors in our study population. A higher risk value for all these TRS was more likely to be associated with obstructive coronary artery disease (OCAD) on CAG. Patients with high risk (≥20% for 10-year) QRESEARCH (QRISK3) score category had higher number of patients with obstructive CAD (49.6%) as compared to high risk category of risk score for those with high Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score (46.6%) or risk Framingham (FRS CHD) score (29.2%) and risk atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) score (30.1%) (P < 0.0001). A higher TRS was more likely to be associated with obstructive CAD, with the highest predictability being with QRISK3 (QRISK3 score 60.9%, GRACE score 54.9%, FRS-CHD score 34% and ASCVD score 42.1% respectively; P < 0.0001). A substantial study population (27.4%) cannot be identified using any of these TRS and hence a need of indigenous or modified risk scores is proposed.

Conclusion: QRISK3 score was most efficacious for predicting obstructive CAD in our Indian study population on CAG. A higher risk score also correlated with the number of vessels involved on coronary angiogram. A substantial obstructive CAD patient could not be identified using traditional risk scores hence need for an indigenous or modified score.

在接受冠状动脉造影术的患者中评估各种冠状动脉疾病风险评分与传统风险因素的有效性。
目的分析并比较接受冠状动脉造影术(CAG)的印度西部患者的各种心血管疾病风险评分:在这项前瞻性横断面研究中,1213 名患者接受了常规冠状动脉造影术;在接受冠状动脉造影术前,对他们的临床风险概况和生化检查进行了评估。除人口统计学信息外,还使用各种可用的传统风险评分(TRS)计算了每位患者发生重大心血管事件(心血管死亡、心肌梗死或中风)的 10 年绝对风险。结果显示:传统的心血管风险因素如心肌梗死、心肌梗塞、心肌梗死或中风等占总人数的 40%:结果:高血压(41.8%)和 II 型糖尿病(26.9%)等传统心血管风险因素是研究人群中最普遍的两个风险因素。所有这些 TRS 的风险值越高,越可能与 CAG 上的阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(OCAD)有关。与全球急性冠状动脉事件登记(GRACE)高风险评分(46.6%)或弗雷明汉(FRS CHD)风险评分(29.2%)和动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)风险评分(30.1%)相比,QRESEARCH(QRISK3)高风险(10 年≥20%)评分类别的患者有更多的阻塞性 CAD 患者(49.6%)(P < 0.0001)。TRS越高越可能与阻塞性CAD有关,其中QRISK3的预测性最高(QRISK3评分为60.9%,GRACE评分为54.9%,FRS-CHD评分为34%,ASCVD评分为42.1%;P<0.0001)。有相当一部分研究对象(27.4%)无法使用这些TRS中的任何一种进行识别,因此建议需要使用本地的或经过修改的风险评分:结论:QRISK3 评分对预测印度 CAG 研究人群中的阻塞性 CAD 最有效。较高的风险评分也与冠状动脉造影中受累血管的数量相关。使用传统的风险评分法无法识别严重的阻塞性 CAD 患者,因此需要一种本土的或经过修改的评分法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Saudi Heart Association
Journal of the Saudi Heart Association CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信