Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Through-the-Scope Suture System for Gastrointestinal Defects: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Muhammad Aziz, Hossein Haghbin, Manesh Kumar Gangwani, Azizullah Beran, Dushyant Singh Dahiya, Hassam Ali, Amir Humza Sohail, Wade Lee-Smith, Syed Uzair Hamdani, Faisal Kamal, Douglas G Adler
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Through-the-Scope Suture System for Gastrointestinal Defects: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Muhammad Aziz, Hossein Haghbin, Manesh Kumar Gangwani, Azizullah Beran, Dushyant Singh Dahiya, Hassam Ali, Amir Humza Sohail, Wade Lee-Smith, Syed Uzair Hamdani, Faisal Kamal, Douglas G Adler","doi":"10.1097/MCG.0000000000002019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Recently, a through-the-scope suturing (TTSS) system has received FDA approval and has been evaluated for closing mucosal defects postintervention. We hereby performed a systematic review and pooled meta-analysis of available studies to assess the safety and efficacy of this intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We queried the following databases through April 26, 2023: Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science Core Collection. Endoscopists utilizing TTSS for the following reasons were included: endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection, peroral endoscopic myotomy, perforation, fistula closure, and/or stent fixation. The outcomes assessed were technical success, primary clinical success (closure of defect without additional intervention), and overall clinical success (closure of defect with/without additional intervention). Random effects model with the DerSimonian Laird approach was used to report event rates expressed as proportions with a 95% CI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12 studies with 512 patients (mean age of 61.5 ± 18.4 y, 54.6% females) were included. The technical success rate was 96.0% (CI: 94.3%-97.7%). The primary clinical success rate was 74.8% (CI: 65.5%-84.1%). The overall clinical success rate was 95.4% (CI: 92.6-98.2%). Only 1 mortality case unrelated to intervention was reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The TTSS appears safe and effective for closing mucosal defects after therapeutic endoscopic interventions. Further cost-effective studies should be performed comparing with endoclips for use in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":15457,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000002019","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Recently, a through-the-scope suturing (TTSS) system has received FDA approval and has been evaluated for closing mucosal defects postintervention. We hereby performed a systematic review and pooled meta-analysis of available studies to assess the safety and efficacy of this intervention.

Methods: We queried the following databases through April 26, 2023: Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science Core Collection. Endoscopists utilizing TTSS for the following reasons were included: endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection, peroral endoscopic myotomy, perforation, fistula closure, and/or stent fixation. The outcomes assessed were technical success, primary clinical success (closure of defect without additional intervention), and overall clinical success (closure of defect with/without additional intervention). Random effects model with the DerSimonian Laird approach was used to report event rates expressed as proportions with a 95% CI.

Results: A total of 12 studies with 512 patients (mean age of 61.5 ± 18.4 y, 54.6% females) were included. The technical success rate was 96.0% (CI: 94.3%-97.7%). The primary clinical success rate was 74.8% (CI: 65.5%-84.1%). The overall clinical success rate was 95.4% (CI: 92.6-98.2%). Only 1 mortality case unrelated to intervention was reported.

Conclusion: The TTSS appears safe and effective for closing mucosal defects after therapeutic endoscopic interventions. Further cost-effective studies should be performed comparing with endoclips for use in clinical settings.

内窥镜镜下缝合系统治疗胃肠道缺陷的有效性和安全性:系统回顾与元分析》。
目的:最近,一种镜下缝合(TTSS)系统获得了美国食品及药物管理局(FDA)的批准,并对干预后缝合粘膜缺损的效果进行了评估。在此,我们对现有研究进行了系统回顾和汇总荟萃分析,以评估这种干预方法的安全性和有效性:我们查询了截至 2023 年 4 月 26 日的以下数据库:方法:我们查询了截至 2023 年 4 月 26 日的以下数据库:Embase、MEDLINE、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials 和 Web of Science Core Collection。纳入了因以下原因使用 TTSS 的内镜医师:内镜下粘膜切除术、内镜下粘膜下剥离术、口周内镜下肌切开术、穿孔、瘘管闭合和/或支架固定术。评估的结果包括技术成功率、主要临床成功率(在无额外干预的情况下闭合缺损)和总体临床成功率(在有/无额外干预的情况下闭合缺损)。采用 DerSimonian Laird 方法建立随机效应模型,以比例和 95% CI 表示事件发生率:共有 12 项研究纳入了 512 名患者(平均年龄为 61.5 ± 18.4 岁,54.6% 为女性)。技术成功率为 96.0%(CI:94.3%-97.7%)。主要临床成功率为 74.8%(CI:65.5%-84.1%)。总体临床成功率为 95.4%(CI:92.6%-98.2%)。只有 1 例死亡病例与干预无关:结论:TTSS 用于治疗性内镜干预后的粘膜缺损闭合似乎安全有效。应进一步开展成本效益研究,将其与内镜夹进行比较,以便在临床环境中使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of clinical gastroenterology
Journal of clinical gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
339
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology gathers the world''s latest, most relevant clinical studies and reviews, case reports, and technical expertise in a single source. Regular features include cutting-edge, peer-reviewed articles and clinical reviews that put the latest research and development into the context of your practice. Also included are biographies, focused organ reviews, practice management, and therapeutic recommendations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信