Transgender persons' view on previous fertility decision-making and current infertility: a qualitative study.

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
J D Asseler, I de Nie, F B van Rooij, T D Steensma, D Mosterd, M O Verhoeven, M Goddijn, J A F Huirne, N M van Mello
{"title":"Transgender persons' view on previous fertility decision-making and current infertility: a qualitative study.","authors":"J D Asseler, I de Nie, F B van Rooij, T D Steensma, D Mosterd, M O Verhoeven, M Goddijn, J A F Huirne, N M van Mello","doi":"10.1093/humrep/deae155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study question: </strong>How do adult transgender and gender diverse (TGD) people, who are infertile due to prior gender-affirming treatment, view their current infertility and their reproductive decisions made in the past?</p><p><strong>Summary answer: </strong>In a time where sterilization was mandatory, transgender adolescents prioritized gender-affirming treatment over their future fertility and would make the same choice today despite emotional challenges related to infertility experienced by some.</p><p><strong>What is known already: </strong>Under transgender law in the Netherlands, sterilization was required for legal gender recognition until 2014, resulting in permanent infertility. The long-term consequences of this iatrogenic infertility in transgender adolescents who have now reached adulthood remain underexplored.</p><p><strong>Study design, size, duration: </strong>Qualitative study design based on 21 in-depth one-on-one semi-structured interviews.</p><p><strong>Participants/materials, setting, methods: </strong>TGD people in a stage of life where family planning may be a current topic were eligible for participation. They all received gender-affirming treatment in adolescence prior to the legislation change in 2014. A purposeful sampling technique was used from participants of another ongoing study. Eleven people assigned female at birth and ten people assigned male at birth were included. Interview transcripts were thematically analysed using a modified version of Braun and Clarke's six steps theory.</p><p><strong>Main results and the role of chance: </strong>Six main themes were generated: (i) personal considerations regarding fertility and fertility preservation in the past; (ii) external considerations regarding fertility and fertility preservation in the past; (iii) current vision on past considerations and decisions; (iv) Current experiences and coping with infertility; (v) future family building; (vi) advice regarding fertility and fertility preservation decision-making.</p><p><strong>Limitations, reasons for caution: </strong>Selection, recall, and choice supportive bias may play a role in interpreting our results.</p><p><strong>Wider implications of the findings: </strong>This study highlights the importance of tailored counselling and comprehensive information on fertility preservation for transgender individuals, especially adolescents, undergoing gender-affirming treatment.</p><p><strong>Study funding/competing interest(s): </strong>N/A.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>N/A.</p>","PeriodicalId":13003,"journal":{"name":"Human reproduction","volume":" ","pages":"2032-2042"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11373325/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deae155","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study question: How do adult transgender and gender diverse (TGD) people, who are infertile due to prior gender-affirming treatment, view their current infertility and their reproductive decisions made in the past?

Summary answer: In a time where sterilization was mandatory, transgender adolescents prioritized gender-affirming treatment over their future fertility and would make the same choice today despite emotional challenges related to infertility experienced by some.

What is known already: Under transgender law in the Netherlands, sterilization was required for legal gender recognition until 2014, resulting in permanent infertility. The long-term consequences of this iatrogenic infertility in transgender adolescents who have now reached adulthood remain underexplored.

Study design, size, duration: Qualitative study design based on 21 in-depth one-on-one semi-structured interviews.

Participants/materials, setting, methods: TGD people in a stage of life where family planning may be a current topic were eligible for participation. They all received gender-affirming treatment in adolescence prior to the legislation change in 2014. A purposeful sampling technique was used from participants of another ongoing study. Eleven people assigned female at birth and ten people assigned male at birth were included. Interview transcripts were thematically analysed using a modified version of Braun and Clarke's six steps theory.

Main results and the role of chance: Six main themes were generated: (i) personal considerations regarding fertility and fertility preservation in the past; (ii) external considerations regarding fertility and fertility preservation in the past; (iii) current vision on past considerations and decisions; (iv) Current experiences and coping with infertility; (v) future family building; (vi) advice regarding fertility and fertility preservation decision-making.

Limitations, reasons for caution: Selection, recall, and choice supportive bias may play a role in interpreting our results.

Wider implications of the findings: This study highlights the importance of tailored counselling and comprehensive information on fertility preservation for transgender individuals, especially adolescents, undergoing gender-affirming treatment.

Study funding/competing interest(s): N/A.

Trial registration number: N/A.

变性人对以往生育决策和当前不孕症的看法:一项定性研究。
研究问题:成年变性人和性别多元化(TGD)人因之前接受过性别确认治疗而不育,他们如何看待自己目前的不育症和过去做出的生育决定?在强制绝育的时代,变性青少年优先考虑的是性别确认治疗,而不是他们未来的生育能力,尽管有些人经历了与不孕不育有关的情感挑战,他们今天也会做出同样的选择:根据荷兰的变性法律,直到 2014 年,合法的性别认可都要求进行绝育手术,这导致了永久性不孕。研究设计、规模、持续时间:研究设计、规模、持续时间:基于 21 次一对一半结构式深度访谈的定性研究设计:研究对象/材料、环境、方法:处于计划生育可能是当前主题的人生阶段的 TGD 人符合参与条件。他们都在 2014 年立法修改之前的青春期接受过性别确认治疗。从另一项正在进行的研究的参与者中采用了有目的的抽样技术。其中包括 11 名出生时被分配为女性的人和 10 名出生时被分配为男性的人。采用布劳恩和克拉克的六步骤理论的改进版对访谈记录进行了主题分析:产生了六大主题:(i) 过去对生育和生育保护的个人考虑;(ii) 过去对生育和生育保护的外部考虑;(iii) 目前对过去考虑和决定的看法;(iv) 目前的经历和应对不孕不育;(v) 未来的家庭建设;(vi) 对生育和生育保护决策的建议:研究结果的广泛意义:这项研究强调了为接受性别确认治疗的变性人(尤其是青少年)提供量身定制的咨询和有关生育力保存的全面信息的重要性:不详。试验注册号:不详:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human reproduction
Human reproduction 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.60%
发文量
1369
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Human Reproduction features full-length, peer-reviewed papers reporting original research, concise clinical case reports, as well as opinions and debates on topical issues. Papers published cover the clinical science and medical aspects of reproductive physiology, pathology and endocrinology; including andrology, gonad function, gametogenesis, fertilization, embryo development, implantation, early pregnancy, genetics, genetic diagnosis, oncology, infectious disease, surgery, contraception, infertility treatment, psychology, ethics and social issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信