Diagnostic and therapeutic insights in individuals with persistent post-dural puncture headache: A cross-sectional study.

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Headache Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1111/head.14790
Ali Kapan, Thomas Waldhör, Tobias Schiffler, Jürgen Beck, Christian Wöber
{"title":"Diagnostic and therapeutic insights in individuals with persistent post-dural puncture headache: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Ali Kapan, Thomas Waldhör, Tobias Schiffler, Jürgen Beck, Christian Wöber","doi":"10.1111/head.14790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is a frequent complication following lumbar puncture, epidural analgesia, or neuraxial anesthesia. The International Classification of Headache Disorders, third edition categorizes PDPH as a self-limiting condition; however, emerging evidence, including our findings, suggests that PDPH can have a prolonged course, challenging this traditional view.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To elucidate the diagnostic characteristics and treatment outcomes of persistent PDPH (pPDPH), offering insights into its demographic profiles and diagnostic features.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We executed an anonymous, web-based survey targeting individuals aged ≥18 years diagnosed with or suspected of having pPDPH. Recruitment occurred through self-help groups on Facebook. The survey comprised questions regarding diagnostic procedures, treatment regimens, outcomes, and healthcare consultation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey achieved a response rate of 179/347 (51.6%) individuals completing the questionnaire. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks were confirmed in nine of 179 (5.0%) cases. Signs of intracranial hypotension without a CSF leak were observed in 70/179 (39.1%) individuals. All participants underwent magnetic resonance imaging scans of the brain and spine, with computed tomography myelography performed in 113/179 (63.1%) cases. Medications, including analgesics, theophylline, and gabapentin, provided minimal short-term relief. Epidural blood patch treatments resulted in slight-to-moderate short-term improvement in 136/179 (76.0%), significant improvement in 22/179 (12.3%), and complete effectiveness in eight of 179 (4.5%) individuals. For long-term outcomes, slight-to-moderate improvement was reported by 118/179 (66.0%) individuals. Surgical interventions were carried out in 42/179 (23.5%) patients, revealing pseudomeningoceles intraoperatively in 20/42 (47.6%) individuals. After surgery, 21/42 (50.0%) of the participants experienced slight-to-moderate improvement, 12/42 (28.6%) showed more pronounced improvement, and five of the 42 (11.9%) achieved complete effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study underscores the complexities of managing pPDPH. The delay in diagnosis can impact the effectiveness of treatments, including epidural blood patch and surgical interventions, resulting in ongoing symptoms. This underscores the importance of tailored and adaptable treatment strategies. The findings advocate for additional research to deepen the understanding of pPDPH and improve long-term patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":"1015-1026"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Headache","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14790","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is a frequent complication following lumbar puncture, epidural analgesia, or neuraxial anesthesia. The International Classification of Headache Disorders, third edition categorizes PDPH as a self-limiting condition; however, emerging evidence, including our findings, suggests that PDPH can have a prolonged course, challenging this traditional view.

Objectives: To elucidate the diagnostic characteristics and treatment outcomes of persistent PDPH (pPDPH), offering insights into its demographic profiles and diagnostic features.

Methods: We executed an anonymous, web-based survey targeting individuals aged ≥18 years diagnosed with or suspected of having pPDPH. Recruitment occurred through self-help groups on Facebook. The survey comprised questions regarding diagnostic procedures, treatment regimens, outcomes, and healthcare consultation.

Results: The survey achieved a response rate of 179/347 (51.6%) individuals completing the questionnaire. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks were confirmed in nine of 179 (5.0%) cases. Signs of intracranial hypotension without a CSF leak were observed in 70/179 (39.1%) individuals. All participants underwent magnetic resonance imaging scans of the brain and spine, with computed tomography myelography performed in 113/179 (63.1%) cases. Medications, including analgesics, theophylline, and gabapentin, provided minimal short-term relief. Epidural blood patch treatments resulted in slight-to-moderate short-term improvement in 136/179 (76.0%), significant improvement in 22/179 (12.3%), and complete effectiveness in eight of 179 (4.5%) individuals. For long-term outcomes, slight-to-moderate improvement was reported by 118/179 (66.0%) individuals. Surgical interventions were carried out in 42/179 (23.5%) patients, revealing pseudomeningoceles intraoperatively in 20/42 (47.6%) individuals. After surgery, 21/42 (50.0%) of the participants experienced slight-to-moderate improvement, 12/42 (28.6%) showed more pronounced improvement, and five of the 42 (11.9%) achieved complete effectiveness.

Conclusion: This study underscores the complexities of managing pPDPH. The delay in diagnosis can impact the effectiveness of treatments, including epidural blood patch and surgical interventions, resulting in ongoing symptoms. This underscores the importance of tailored and adaptable treatment strategies. The findings advocate for additional research to deepen the understanding of pPDPH and improve long-term patient outcomes.

硬膜穿刺后持续头痛患者的诊断和治疗见解:横断面研究。
背景:硬膜穿刺后头痛(PDPH)是腰椎穿刺、硬膜外镇痛或神经轴麻醉后的常见并发症。国际头痛疾病分类》(International Classification of Headache Disorders)第三版将硬膜外穿刺后头痛归类为一种自限性疾病;然而,包括我们的研究结果在内的新证据表明,硬膜外穿刺后头痛的病程可能较长,从而对这一传统观点提出了挑战:目的:阐明持续性 PDPH(pPDPH)的诊断特征和治疗效果,深入了解其人口统计学特征和诊断特征:我们针对年龄≥18 岁、被诊断患有或疑似患有 PPDPH 的个体进行了匿名网络调查。我们通过 Facebook 上的自助小组进行招募。调查内容包括诊断程序、治疗方案、结果和医疗咨询等方面的问题:调查的回复率为 179/347(51.6%)人完成问卷。179 例病例中有 9 例(5.0%)确诊为脑脊液(CSF)漏。70/179(39.1%)例患者出现颅内低血压,但无脑脊液漏。所有参与者均接受了脑部和脊柱磁共振成像扫描,其中 113/179 例(63.1%)接受了计算机断层扫描髓核造影术。包括镇痛药、茶碱和加巴喷丁在内的药物在短期内只能起到轻微的缓解作用。硬膜外血贴片治疗使 136/179 例(76.0%)患者的病情在短期内得到轻微至中度改善,22/179 例(12.3%)患者的病情得到明显改善,179 例患者中有 8 例(4.5%)完全有效。在长期疗效方面,118/179(66.0%)人的疗效为轻微至中度改善。42/179(23.5%)名患者接受了手术治疗,其中20/42(47.6%)名患者术中发现了假门静脉。手术后,21/42(50.0%)名参与者的病情有轻微至中度改善,12/42(28.6%)人的病情有较明显改善,42 人中有 5 人(11.9%)的病情完全有效:本研究强调了治疗帕金森病的复杂性。诊断延误会影响治疗效果,包括硬膜外血贴和手术干预,导致症状持续存在。这凸显了量身定制、适应性强的治疗策略的重要性。研究结果主张开展更多研究,以加深对 pPDPH 的了解,改善患者的长期预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Headache
Headache 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
172
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Headache publishes original articles on all aspects of head and face pain including communications on clinical and basic research, diagnosis and management, epidemiology, genetics, and pathophysiology of primary and secondary headaches, cranial neuralgias, and pains referred to the head and face. Monthly issues feature case reports, short communications, review articles, letters to the editor, and news items regarding AHS plus medicolegal and socioeconomic aspects of head pain. This is the official journal of the American Headache Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信