Fulfilling last wishes: improving the compassionate discharge process.

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Rasidah Alias, Yi Ling Neo, Liyun Wang, Long Zhen Sie, Hwee Jin Goh, Mohamed Yazid Mohamed Hussein, Hasnah Abdullah, Yoke Ping Wong
{"title":"Fulfilling last wishes: improving the compassionate discharge process.","authors":"Rasidah Alias, Yi Ling Neo, Liyun Wang, Long Zhen Sie, Hwee Jin Goh, Mohamed Yazid Mohamed Hussein, Hasnah Abdullah, Yoke Ping Wong","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Compassionate discharges (ComD), commonly known as rapid discharges, are urgent one-way discharges for critically ill hospitalised patients with death expected within hours or less than 7 days, to die at their place of choice-usually in their own home. Challenges abound in this time-sensitive setting when multiple parties must work together to prepare medically unstable patients for discharge, yet healthcare staff are largely unaware of the process, resulting in delays.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Process mapping, an Ishikawa diagram and a Pareto chart were used to identify barriers, which included timely acquisition of home equipment and medication and poor communication among stakeholders. In May 2020, the Quality Improvement (QI) team embarked on a pilot project to reduce family caregiver anxiety and delays in the ComD process while maintaining a success rate above 90% over a 12-month period.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Three Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles were used to refine a ComD resource package that was developed; this consisted of a checklist, a kit and caregiver resources. This was to support nurses, doctors and families during this difficult and emotional transition. Items in the ComD resource package were revised iteratively based on user feedback, with further data collected to measure its usefulness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 12-month ComD success rate over 3 PDSA cycles were 88.9%, 94.2% and 96.7%, respectively, after each cycle. There was a consistent reduction in the level of family anxiety before and after caregiver training and resources. Reasons for failed ComD included acute clinical deterioration or delays in obtaining home oxygen support.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ComD resource package allowed collaborative work across different disciplines, strengthening the safety and utility of ComD and allowing patients to die in their place of choice. These are ubiquitous across settings; this QI problem is thus relevant beyond our local institution.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11253726/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002666","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Compassionate discharges (ComD), commonly known as rapid discharges, are urgent one-way discharges for critically ill hospitalised patients with death expected within hours or less than 7 days, to die at their place of choice-usually in their own home. Challenges abound in this time-sensitive setting when multiple parties must work together to prepare medically unstable patients for discharge, yet healthcare staff are largely unaware of the process, resulting in delays.

Methods: Process mapping, an Ishikawa diagram and a Pareto chart were used to identify barriers, which included timely acquisition of home equipment and medication and poor communication among stakeholders. In May 2020, the Quality Improvement (QI) team embarked on a pilot project to reduce family caregiver anxiety and delays in the ComD process while maintaining a success rate above 90% over a 12-month period.

Interventions: Three Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles were used to refine a ComD resource package that was developed; this consisted of a checklist, a kit and caregiver resources. This was to support nurses, doctors and families during this difficult and emotional transition. Items in the ComD resource package were revised iteratively based on user feedback, with further data collected to measure its usefulness.

Results: The 12-month ComD success rate over 3 PDSA cycles were 88.9%, 94.2% and 96.7%, respectively, after each cycle. There was a consistent reduction in the level of family anxiety before and after caregiver training and resources. Reasons for failed ComD included acute clinical deterioration or delays in obtaining home oxygen support.

Conclusion: The ComD resource package allowed collaborative work across different disciplines, strengthening the safety and utility of ComD and allowing patients to die in their place of choice. These are ubiquitous across settings; this QI problem is thus relevant beyond our local institution.

实现最后的愿望:改善有同情心的出院程序。
背景:体恤出院(ComD)通常被称为快速出院,是指重症住院病人在预计死亡时间在数小时或 7 天以内的情况下紧急单向出院,让他们在自己选择的地方(通常是在自己家中)死亡。在这种时间紧迫的情况下,多方必须共同合作,为病情不稳定的病人做好出院准备,但医护人员大多不了解这一流程,导致延误,因此挑战重重:方法:使用流程图、石川图和帕累托图表来识别障碍,其中包括家庭设备和药物的及时采购以及利益相关者之间的沟通不畅。2020 年 5 月,质量改进(QI)团队开始实施一项试点项目,以减少家庭护理人员的焦虑和 ComD 流程中的延误,同时在 12 个月内保持 90% 以上的成功率:干预措施:采用三个 "计划-实施-研究-行动"(PDSA)周期来完善已开发的 ComD 资源包;该资源包由检查表、工具包和护理人员资源组成。这是为护士、医生和家属在这一艰难和情绪化的过渡时期提供支持。根据用户反馈,对 ComD 资源包中的项目进行了反复修订,并收集了更多数据以衡量其实用性:结果:在 3 个 PDSA 周期中,12 个月的 ComD 成功率分别为 88.9%、94.2% 和 96.7%。在对护理人员进行培训并提供资源前后,家庭焦虑程度持续降低。ComD失败的原因包括急性临床恶化或延迟获得家庭氧气支持:ComD资源包允许不同学科间的合作,加强了ComD的安全性和实用性,并允许患者在自己选择的地方死亡。这些问题在各种环境中普遍存在,因此,这一 QI 问题的相关性超出了我们当地机构的范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信