Managing medications among individuals with mild cognitive impairment and dementia: Patient-caregiver perspectives

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Rachel O'Conor PhD, MPH, Andrea M. Russell PhD, Allison Pack PhD, MPH, Dianne Oladejo BA, Sarah Filec MPH, Emily Rogalski PhD, Darby Morhardt PhD, Lee A. Lindquist MD, MPH, MBA, Michael S. Wolf PhD, MPH
{"title":"Managing medications among individuals with mild cognitive impairment and dementia: Patient-caregiver perspectives","authors":"Rachel O'Conor PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Andrea M. Russell PhD,&nbsp;Allison Pack PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Dianne Oladejo BA,&nbsp;Sarah Filec MPH,&nbsp;Emily Rogalski PhD,&nbsp;Darby Morhardt PhD,&nbsp;Lee A. Lindquist MD, MPH, MBA,&nbsp;Michael S. Wolf PhD, MPH","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>With changing cognitive abilities, individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia face challenges in successfully managing multidrug regimens. We sought to understand how individuals with MCI or dementia and their family caregivers manage multidrug regimens and better understand patient-to-caregiver transitions in medication management responsibilities.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted qualitative interviews among patient–caregiver dyads. Eligibility included: patients with a diagnosis of MCI, mild or moderate dementia, managing ≥3 chronic conditions, ≥5 prescription medications, who also had a family caregiver ≥18 years old. Semi-structured interview guides, informed by the Medication Self-Management model, ascertained roles and responsibilities for medication management and patient-to-caregiver transitions in medication responsibilities.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We interviewed 32 patient–caregiver dyads. Older adults and caregivers favored older adult autonomy in medication management, and individuals with MCI and mild dementia largely managed their medications independently using multiple strategies (e.g., establishing daily routines, using pillboxes). Among individuals with moderate dementia, caregivers assumed all medication-related responsibilities except when living separately. In those scenarios, caregivers set up organizers and made reminder calls, but did not observe family members taking medications. Patient-to-caregiver transitions in medication responsibilities frequently occurred after caregivers observed older adults making errors with medications. As caregivers sought to assume greater responsibilities with family members' medicines, they faced multiple barriers. Most barriers were dyadic; they affected both the older adult and the caregiver and/or the relationship. Some barriers were specific to caregivers; these included caregivers' competing responsibilities or inaccurate perceptions of dementia, while other barriers were related to the healthcare system.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>To ease medication management transitions, balance must be sought between preservation of older adult autonomy and early family caregiver involvement. Clinicians should work to initiate conversations with family caregivers and individuals living with MCI or dementia about transitioning medication responsibilities as memory loss progresses, simplify regimens, and deprescribe, as appropriate.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"72 10","pages":"3011-3021"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11461121/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.19065","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

With changing cognitive abilities, individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia face challenges in successfully managing multidrug regimens. We sought to understand how individuals with MCI or dementia and their family caregivers manage multidrug regimens and better understand patient-to-caregiver transitions in medication management responsibilities.

Methods

We conducted qualitative interviews among patient–caregiver dyads. Eligibility included: patients with a diagnosis of MCI, mild or moderate dementia, managing ≥3 chronic conditions, ≥5 prescription medications, who also had a family caregiver ≥18 years old. Semi-structured interview guides, informed by the Medication Self-Management model, ascertained roles and responsibilities for medication management and patient-to-caregiver transitions in medication responsibilities.

Results

We interviewed 32 patient–caregiver dyads. Older adults and caregivers favored older adult autonomy in medication management, and individuals with MCI and mild dementia largely managed their medications independently using multiple strategies (e.g., establishing daily routines, using pillboxes). Among individuals with moderate dementia, caregivers assumed all medication-related responsibilities except when living separately. In those scenarios, caregivers set up organizers and made reminder calls, but did not observe family members taking medications. Patient-to-caregiver transitions in medication responsibilities frequently occurred after caregivers observed older adults making errors with medications. As caregivers sought to assume greater responsibilities with family members' medicines, they faced multiple barriers. Most barriers were dyadic; they affected both the older adult and the caregiver and/or the relationship. Some barriers were specific to caregivers; these included caregivers' competing responsibilities or inaccurate perceptions of dementia, while other barriers were related to the healthcare system.

Conclusions

To ease medication management transitions, balance must be sought between preservation of older adult autonomy and early family caregiver involvement. Clinicians should work to initiate conversations with family caregivers and individuals living with MCI or dementia about transitioning medication responsibilities as memory loss progresses, simplify regimens, and deprescribe, as appropriate.

Abstract Image

轻度认知障碍和痴呆症患者的药物管理:患者-护理人员的观点。
背景:随着认知能力的改变,轻度认知障碍(MCI)和痴呆患者在成功管理多种药物治疗方案方面面临挑战。我们试图了解轻度认知障碍(MCI)或痴呆症患者及其家庭照顾者是如何管理多种药物治疗方案的,并更好地了解患者与照顾者之间在药物管理责任方面的转变:我们对患者和护理人员进行了定性访谈。符合条件的患者包括:诊断为 MCI、轻度或中度痴呆的患者,管理的慢性病≥3 种,处方药≥5 种,且其家庭照顾者年龄≥18 岁。根据用药自我管理模式制定的半结构式访谈指南确定了用药管理的角色和责任,以及患者与护理人员在用药责任方面的转变:结果:我们采访了 32 个患者-护理人员二人组。老年人和照护者都倾向于让老年人自主管理药物,患有 MCI 和轻度痴呆症的患者在很大程度上使用多种策略(如建立日常作息习惯、使用药盒)独立管理药物。在中度痴呆患者中,护理人员承担了所有与用药相关的责任,除非他们分开居住。在这些情况下,照护者会设置组织者并拨打提醒电话,但不会观察家庭成员服药。患者与照护者之间用药责任的转变经常发生在照护者观察到老年人用药出错之后。当照护者试图对家庭成员的用药承担更大责任时,他们面临着多重障碍。大多数障碍都是双方面的,既影响老年人,也影响照顾者和/或他们之间的关系。有些障碍是照顾者特有的,其中包括照顾者的责任竞争或对痴呆症的不正确认识,而其他障碍则与医疗保健系统有关:为了缓解药物管理的过渡,必须在维护老年人自主权和家庭照顾者早期参与之间寻求平衡。临床医生应努力与家庭照护者和 MCI 或痴呆症患者就随着记忆力减退而过渡用药责任展开对话,简化用药方案,并酌情取消处方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
6.30%
发文量
504
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) is the go-to journal for clinical aging research. We provide a diverse, interprofessional community of healthcare professionals with the latest insights on geriatrics education, clinical practice, and public policy—all supporting the high-quality, person-centered care essential to our well-being as we age. Since the publication of our first edition in 1953, JAGS has remained one of the oldest and most impactful journals dedicated exclusively to gerontology and geriatrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信