Determining the Optimal Intramedullary Screw Canal Fill Ratio in Length Unstable Metacarpal Fractures: A Biomechanical Investigation

Abstract

Purpose

Intramedullary (IM) screw fixation is gaining popularity in the treatment of metacarpal fractures. Despite its rapid adoption, there is a paucity of evidence regarding parameters to optimize effectiveness. This study aimed to quantify the relationship between stability, IM screw size, and canal fill using a cadaveric model.

Methods

Thirty cadaveric metacarpals (14 index, 13 middle, and three ring fingers; mean age: 58.3 years, range: 48–70) were selected to allow for canal fill ratios of 0.7–1.1 for screws sized 3.0, 3.5, and 4.5 mm. Metacarpals underwent a 45° volar–dorsal osteotomy at the midpoint before fixation with an IM screw. Specimens were subjected to 100 cycles of loading at 10 N, 20 N, and 30 N before load-to-failure testing. Correlation coefficients for angular displacement on the final cycle at each load, peak load to failure, and average stiffness were assessed.

Results

Correlation coefficients for the angular displacement on the 100th cycle were as follows: 10 N, R = 0.62, 20 N, R = 0.57, and 30N, R = 0.58. Correlation values for peak load to failure as a function of canal fit were as follows: 3.0 mm, R = 0.5, 3.5 mm, R = 0.17, and 4.5 mm, R = 0.44. The canal fill ratio that intersected the line-of-best fit at an angular deformity of 10° was 0.74. Average peak forces for 3.0-, 3.5-, and 4.5-mm screws were 79.5, 136.5, and 179.6 N, respectively. Average stiffness for each caliber was 14.8, 33.4, and 52.3 N/mm.

Conclusions

Increasing screw diameter and IM fill resulted in more stable fixation, but marginal gains were seen in ratios >0.9. A minimum fill ratio of 0.74 was sufficient to withstand forces of early active motion with angular deformity <10°.

Clinical relevance

An understanding of the relationship of IM fill ratio of metacarpal screws to fracture stability may provide a framework for clinicians to optimally size these implants.