Pins and Rubber Band Traction System Combined with Internal Fixation for Intra-articular Fractures of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joints.

IF 0.5 Q4 SURGERY
Shinsuke Morisaki, Shinji Tsuchida, Ryo Oda, Kenji Takahashi
{"title":"Pins and Rubber Band Traction System Combined with Internal Fixation for Intra-articular Fractures of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joints.","authors":"Shinsuke Morisaki, Shinji Tsuchida, Ryo Oda, Kenji Takahashi","doi":"10.1142/S2424835524500280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Intra-articular fractures of the proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) can result in poor outcomes if inadequately treated. Dynamic external fixation and internal fixation with plates and/or screws are two treatment options. The role of combining these two methods is unclear. The aim of this study is to determine the outcomes of patients with intra-articular fractures of the PIPJ treated with a combination of dynamic external fixation with a plate and/or screws. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective review was conducted on 18 consecutive cases of intra-articular fractures of the PIPJ treated with pins and rubber band traction system (PRTS) combined with dorsal internal fixation with plates and/or screws. The patients' average age was 51 years (range: 20-81 years). The fracture patterns were volar-type (<i>n</i> = 2), dorsal-type (<i>n</i> = 4) and pilon-type (<i>n</i> = 12). Data with regard to time to surgery, interphalangeal joint range of motion, grip strength, VAS for pain, Quick DASH score, complications, duration of follow-up and return to work were collected. <b>Results:</b> The levels of articular involvement were stable (<i>n</i> = 1), tenuous (<i>n</i> = 5) and unstable (<i>n</i> = 12). The average time to surgery was 9 days, and the average follow-up period was 15 months. The fracture was fixed with a dorsal plate and screws in 10 patients and with only screws in eight patients. All patients had PRTS. All patients returned to their original occupation and the fractures united in good alignment. The average grip strength was 86% of that of the unaffected side. The average active PIPJ motion was 85° (range: 50°-106°), and the average active distal interphalangeal joint (DIPJ) motion was 48° (range: 10°-90°). <b>Conclusions:</b> Our results show that a combination of PRTS and open reduction and fixation with plate and/or screws achieved a good range of motion and articular reduction. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level IV (Therapeutic).</p>","PeriodicalId":51689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","volume":" ","pages":"286-293"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835524500280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intra-articular fractures of the proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) can result in poor outcomes if inadequately treated. Dynamic external fixation and internal fixation with plates and/or screws are two treatment options. The role of combining these two methods is unclear. The aim of this study is to determine the outcomes of patients with intra-articular fractures of the PIPJ treated with a combination of dynamic external fixation with a plate and/or screws. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on 18 consecutive cases of intra-articular fractures of the PIPJ treated with pins and rubber band traction system (PRTS) combined with dorsal internal fixation with plates and/or screws. The patients' average age was 51 years (range: 20-81 years). The fracture patterns were volar-type (n = 2), dorsal-type (n = 4) and pilon-type (n = 12). Data with regard to time to surgery, interphalangeal joint range of motion, grip strength, VAS for pain, Quick DASH score, complications, duration of follow-up and return to work were collected. Results: The levels of articular involvement were stable (n = 1), tenuous (n = 5) and unstable (n = 12). The average time to surgery was 9 days, and the average follow-up period was 15 months. The fracture was fixed with a dorsal plate and screws in 10 patients and with only screws in eight patients. All patients had PRTS. All patients returned to their original occupation and the fractures united in good alignment. The average grip strength was 86% of that of the unaffected side. The average active PIPJ motion was 85° (range: 50°-106°), and the average active distal interphalangeal joint (DIPJ) motion was 48° (range: 10°-90°). Conclusions: Our results show that a combination of PRTS and open reduction and fixation with plate and/or screws achieved a good range of motion and articular reduction. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic).

针和橡皮筋牵引系统结合内固定治疗近端指间关节关节内骨折。
背景:近端指间关节(PIPJ)的关节内骨折如果治疗不当,可能会导致不良后果。动态外固定和钢板及/或螺钉内固定是两种治疗方法。目前尚不清楚将这两种方法结合使用的作用。本研究旨在确定结合钢板和/或螺钉动态外固定治疗 PIPJ 关节内骨折患者的疗效。研究方法对连续 18 例采用钢钉和橡皮圈牵引系统(PRTS)结合钢板和/或螺钉背侧内固定治疗的 PIPJ 关节内骨折患者进行了回顾性研究。患者平均年龄为 51 岁(20-81 岁)。骨折类型为伏型(2 例)、背型(4 例)和皮隆型(12 例)。收集的数据包括手术时间、指间关节活动范围、握力、疼痛 VAS、快速 DASH 评分、并发症、随访时间和重返工作岗位情况。结果显示关节受累程度为稳定(1 例)、脆弱(5 例)和不稳定(12 例)。平均手术时间为 9 天,平均随访时间为 15 个月。10例患者使用背板和螺钉固定骨折,8例患者仅使用螺钉固定。所有患者均有 PRTS。所有患者都恢复了原来的工作,骨折对位整齐。平均握力是未受影响一侧的86%。PIPJ的平均活动度为85°(范围:50°-106°),远端指间关节(DIPJ)的平均活动度为48°(范围:10°-90°)。结论我们的研究结果表明,结合 PRTS 和切开复位并用钢板和/或螺钉固定,可以实现良好的活动范围和关节复位。证据等级:IV级(治疗)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
304
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信