Outcomes of Arthroscopic Debridement of the First Carpometacarpal Joint: A Systematic Review.

IF 0.5 Q4 SURGERY
Andrew Shehovych, Richard Lawson, David J Graham, Brahman S Sivakumar
{"title":"Outcomes of Arthroscopic Debridement of the First Carpometacarpal Joint: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Andrew Shehovych, Richard Lawson, David J Graham, Brahman S Sivakumar","doi":"10.1142/S2424835524500279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Arthroscopic debridement is increasingly being utilised in patients with early-stage first carpometacarpal joint (FCMCJ) arthritis but has limited supportive evidence. This systematic review evaluates the literature, and reports on outcomes and adverse events following this procedure. <b>Methods:</b> An electronic literature search of PubMed, Embase, Medline and Cochrane Central, looking for studies describing outcomes following arthroscopic debridement in FCMCJ arthritis, was performed in November 2022. Studies where bony resection or interposition was performed as adjuncts were excluded. Reported outcomes included visual analogue scores (VAS) for pain; Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores; pinch and grip strength; complications and re-operations. <b>Results:</b> Out of a total of 90 studies revealed from the search, only two studies were eligible for inclusion, with a cohort of 34 patients. Following arthroscopic debridement for FCMCJ osteoarthritis, the mean VAS improved by four units, mean DASH by 22 points, grip strength by 4.5 kg and pinch strength by 2 kg at mean follow-up of 18 months. The pooled complication and re-operation rates were 8.8% and 23.5%, respectively. <b>Conclusions:</b> There is a lack of evidence supporting the utility of FCMCJ arthroscopy and debridement in the management of patients with early arthritis. Although the limited evidence suggests that there may be some therapeutic benefit, further large-scale prospective studies need to be performed before making conclusive recommendations. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level III (Therapeutic).</p>","PeriodicalId":51689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835524500279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Arthroscopic debridement is increasingly being utilised in patients with early-stage first carpometacarpal joint (FCMCJ) arthritis but has limited supportive evidence. This systematic review evaluates the literature, and reports on outcomes and adverse events following this procedure. Methods: An electronic literature search of PubMed, Embase, Medline and Cochrane Central, looking for studies describing outcomes following arthroscopic debridement in FCMCJ arthritis, was performed in November 2022. Studies where bony resection or interposition was performed as adjuncts were excluded. Reported outcomes included visual analogue scores (VAS) for pain; Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores; pinch and grip strength; complications and re-operations. Results: Out of a total of 90 studies revealed from the search, only two studies were eligible for inclusion, with a cohort of 34 patients. Following arthroscopic debridement for FCMCJ osteoarthritis, the mean VAS improved by four units, mean DASH by 22 points, grip strength by 4.5 kg and pinch strength by 2 kg at mean follow-up of 18 months. The pooled complication and re-operation rates were 8.8% and 23.5%, respectively. Conclusions: There is a lack of evidence supporting the utility of FCMCJ arthroscopy and debridement in the management of patients with early arthritis. Although the limited evidence suggests that there may be some therapeutic benefit, further large-scale prospective studies need to be performed before making conclusive recommendations. Level of Evidence: Level III (Therapeutic).

关节镜下第一腕掌关节清创术的疗效:系统回顾。
背景:关节镜清创术越来越多地用于早期第一腕掌关节(FCMCJ)关节炎患者,但支持性证据有限。本系统性综述评估了相关文献,并报告了该手术的疗效和不良反应。方法:2022年11月,我们对PubMed、Embase、Medline和Cochrane Central进行了电子文献检索,寻找有关FCMCJ关节炎关节镜清创术后疗效的研究。排除了将骨切除或骨插植作为辅助手段的研究。报告的结果包括疼痛的视觉模拟评分(VAS)、手臂、肩部和手部残疾(DASH)评分、捏力和握力、并发症和再次手术。结果:在搜索出的总共 90 项研究中,只有两项研究符合纳入条件,共纳入 34 名患者。在对 FCMCJ 骨关节炎进行关节镜清创术后,平均随访 18 个月,VAS 平均值提高了 4 个单位,DASH 平均值提高了 22 分,握力提高了 4.5 千克,捏力提高了 2 千克。合并并发症和再次手术率分别为 8.8% 和 23.5%。结论:目前缺乏证据支持 FCMCJ 关节镜和清创术在早期关节炎患者治疗中的效用。尽管有限的证据表明可能有一定的治疗效果,但在做出结论性建议之前,还需要进一步开展大规模的前瞻性研究。证据等级:三级(治疗)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
304
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信