Classification of Hamate Fractures: An Analysis of 247 Patients with Hamate Fractures.

IF 0.5 Q4 SURGERY
Ge Xiong, Wei Zheng
{"title":"Classification of Hamate Fractures: An Analysis of 247 Patients with Hamate Fractures.","authors":"Ge Xiong, Wei Zheng","doi":"10.1142/S2424835524500334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> We devised a new classification of hamate fractures named the TOUCH classification. Each letter of this acronym depicts a fracture type - Type I (Transverse fracture), Type II (Open and/or complex fracture), Type III (Ulnar/medial tuberosity fracture), Type IV (Coronal fracture) and Type V (Hook fracture). Each fracture type was further divided into two or three subtypes (a, b, and/or c) based on degree of severity. The aim of this study is to classify the hamate fractures treated at our centre using this classification. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective review of all patients with hamate fractures treated at our hospital between 2003 and 2022 was done. Patient data with regard to age, gender, mechanism of injury, injured limb and any associated injuries was collected. Hamate fractures were classified based on the TOUCH classification. <b>Results:</b> A total of 247 patients with hamate fractures were included. Patients in the age group of 20-40 years accounted for 73.6% of all fractures. Female patients accounted for only 6.9% of all fractures and 76.5% of women with hamate fractures were older than 40 years. The incidence of hamate fracture tended to increase with age in women. The most common mechanism of injury was a fall (69 patients). The injury involved the right upper limb in 195 patients. And 164 patients had associated injuries in the same upper limb. Type III (coronal fracture of the hamate body) accounted for 57.4%, followed by type V (hook of hamate fracture) in 26.7% of patients. <b>Conclusions:</b> The TOUCH classification could cover all kinds of hamate fractures. It is easy to remember and may guide surgeons in considering treatment options. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level IV (Diagnostic).</p>","PeriodicalId":51689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","volume":" ","pages":"328-333"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835524500334","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We devised a new classification of hamate fractures named the TOUCH classification. Each letter of this acronym depicts a fracture type - Type I (Transverse fracture), Type II (Open and/or complex fracture), Type III (Ulnar/medial tuberosity fracture), Type IV (Coronal fracture) and Type V (Hook fracture). Each fracture type was further divided into two or three subtypes (a, b, and/or c) based on degree of severity. The aim of this study is to classify the hamate fractures treated at our centre using this classification. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients with hamate fractures treated at our hospital between 2003 and 2022 was done. Patient data with regard to age, gender, mechanism of injury, injured limb and any associated injuries was collected. Hamate fractures were classified based on the TOUCH classification. Results: A total of 247 patients with hamate fractures were included. Patients in the age group of 20-40 years accounted for 73.6% of all fractures. Female patients accounted for only 6.9% of all fractures and 76.5% of women with hamate fractures were older than 40 years. The incidence of hamate fracture tended to increase with age in women. The most common mechanism of injury was a fall (69 patients). The injury involved the right upper limb in 195 patients. And 164 patients had associated injuries in the same upper limb. Type III (coronal fracture of the hamate body) accounted for 57.4%, followed by type V (hook of hamate fracture) in 26.7% of patients. Conclusions: The TOUCH classification could cover all kinds of hamate fractures. It is easy to remember and may guide surgeons in considering treatment options. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Diagnostic).

锤骨骨折的分类:对 247 例锤骨骨折患者的分析。
背景:我们设计了一种新的仓骨骨折分类法,命名为 TOUCH 分类法。该缩写词的每个字母代表一种骨折类型--I型(横断骨折)、II型(开放性和/或复杂骨折)、III型(尺骨/中结节骨折)、IV型(冠状骨折)和V型(钩状骨折)。根据骨折的严重程度,每种骨折类型又可分为 2 或 3 个亚型(a、b 和/或 c)。本研究的目的是根据该分类法对在本中心接受治疗的锤骨骨折进行分类。研究方法对 2003 年至 2022 年期间在我院接受治疗的所有锤骨骨折患者进行回顾性分析。收集了患者的年龄、性别、受伤机制、受伤肢体和任何相关损伤的数据。根据 TOUCH 分类法对锤骨骨折进行分类。结果:共纳入 247 名锤骨骨折患者。20-40岁年龄段的患者占所有骨折患者的73.6%。女性患者仅占所有骨折患者的 6.9%,76.5% 的女性锤骨骨折患者年龄在 40 岁以上。随着年龄的增长,女性腿臼骨折的发生率呈上升趋势。最常见的受伤机制是跌倒(69 名患者)。195名患者的损伤涉及右上肢。164名患者的同一上肢伴有损伤。III型(锤骨体冠状骨折)占57.4%,其次是V型(锤骨钩骨折),占26.7%。结论是TOUCH 分类法可涵盖所有类型的锤骨骨折。它易于记忆,可指导外科医生考虑治疗方案。证据等级:IV级(诊断)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
304
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信