Inpatient treatment modalities of coronavirus disease 2019 in the Egyptian population: A bi-center retrospective observational study.

Q3 Medicine
Hatem Hossam Mowafy, Mohamed Tarek Elkhwaas, Shereen Moustafa AlGengeehy, Hanan Elsayed Zaghla, Marwa Elsayed Abdelfattah
{"title":"Inpatient treatment modalities of coronavirus disease 2019 in the Egyptian population: A bi-center retrospective observational study.","authors":"Hatem Hossam Mowafy, Mohamed Tarek Elkhwaas, Shereen Moustafa AlGengeehy, Hanan Elsayed Zaghla, Marwa Elsayed Abdelfattah","doi":"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_52_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many protocols for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have been published. In addition to an abundance of studies and meta-analyses on the treatment of COVID-19, different medications used in the intensive care unit will have a significant impact on mortality. The study attempted to highlight, compare, and quantify the impact on outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from subjects' files, encompassing all physiological parameters, hematological profiles, and available laboratory results. In addition, all treatment modalities administered to the subjects were documented in medical files. Survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 120 subjects with confirmed COVID-19. Subjects treated with systemic corticosteroids (hazard Ratio [HR 0.45, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.01-1.32; <i>P</i> = 0.01) and tocilizumab (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.49-1.98; <i>P</i> = 0.05) exhibited lower mortality, while those treated with remdesivir (HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.53-2.43; <i>P</i> = 0.05) showed increased mortality. In patients with COVID-19, improved mortality was observed with early rather than late treatment with noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) (HR 0.01 vs. 1.72, <i>P</i> = 0.05) and tocilizumab (HR 0.45 vs. 1.50, <i>P</i> = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The early use of NIV is associated with decreased mortality compared to late use. Corticosteroids demonstrate a mortality-reducing effect. In addition, early administration of tocilizumab is associated with decreased mortality compared to late use.</p>","PeriodicalId":13938,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","volume":"14 2","pages":"86-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11245141/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_52_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Many protocols for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have been published. In addition to an abundance of studies and meta-analyses on the treatment of COVID-19, different medications used in the intensive care unit will have a significant impact on mortality. The study attempted to highlight, compare, and quantify the impact on outcomes.

Methods: Data were collected from subjects' files, encompassing all physiological parameters, hematological profiles, and available laboratory results. In addition, all treatment modalities administered to the subjects were documented in medical files. Survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards.

Results: The study included 120 subjects with confirmed COVID-19. Subjects treated with systemic corticosteroids (hazard Ratio [HR 0.45, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.01-1.32; P = 0.01) and tocilizumab (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.49-1.98; P = 0.05) exhibited lower mortality, while those treated with remdesivir (HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.53-2.43; P = 0.05) showed increased mortality. In patients with COVID-19, improved mortality was observed with early rather than late treatment with noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) (HR 0.01 vs. 1.72, P = 0.05) and tocilizumab (HR 0.45 vs. 1.50, P = 0.05).

Conclusions: The early use of NIV is associated with decreased mortality compared to late use. Corticosteroids demonstrate a mortality-reducing effect. In addition, early administration of tocilizumab is associated with decreased mortality compared to late use.

2019年埃及冠状病毒病的住院治疗模式:一项双中心回顾性观察研究。
背景:目前已发布了许多治疗冠状病毒病 2019(COVID-19)的方案。除了大量关于COVID-19治疗的研究和荟萃分析外,重症监护室使用的不同药物将对死亡率产生重大影响。本研究试图强调、比较和量化对结果的影响:方法:从受试者的档案中收集数据,包括所有生理参数、血液学特征和可用的实验室结果。此外,医疗档案中还记录了受试者接受的所有治疗方式。采用卡普兰-梅耶曲线和考克斯比例危险系数进行生存分析:研究纳入了 120 名确诊为 COVID-19 的受试者。接受全身皮质类固醇治疗(危险比[HR 0.45,95% 置信区间[CI] 0.01-1.32;P = 0.01)和妥西珠单抗治疗(HR 0.98,95% CI 0.49-1.98;P = 0.05)的受试者死亡率较低,而接受雷米替韦治疗(HR 1.13,95% CI 0.53-2.43;P = 0.05)的受试者死亡率较高。在COVID-19患者中,早期而非晚期使用无创机械通气(NIV)(HR 0.01 vs. 1.72,P = 0.05)和托珠单抗(HR 0.45 vs. 1.50,P = 0.05)治疗可改善死亡率:结论:与晚期使用相比,早期使用 NIV 可降低死亡率。皮质类固醇具有降低死亡率的作用。此外,与晚期使用相比,早期使用托西珠单抗可降低死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: IJCIIS encourages research, education and dissemination of knowledge in the field of Critical Illness and Injury Science across the world thus promoting translational research by striking a synergy between basic science, clinical medicine and public health. The Journal intends to bring together scientists and academicians in the emergency intensive care and promote translational synergy between Laboratory Science, Clinical Medicine and Public Health. The Journal invites Original Articles, Clinical Investigations, Epidemiological Analysis, Data Protocols, Case Reports, Clinical Photographs, review articles and special commentaries. Students, Residents, Academicians, Public Health experts and scientists are all encouraged to be a part of this initiative by contributing, reviewing and promoting scientific works and science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信