Effectiveness of backward gait training on body composition, cardiopulmonary fitness, inflammation, and metabolic marker in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Q3 Medicine
Tuba Aysha, Saima Zaki, Md Farhan Alam, Saurabh Sharma, Saeed Mufleh Alnasser, Abdulkarim Saeed Alqahatn, Aqsa Mujaddadi, Ahmar Raza, Shibili Nuhmani
{"title":"Effectiveness of backward gait training on body composition, cardiopulmonary fitness, inflammation, and metabolic marker in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Tuba Aysha, Saima Zaki, Md Farhan Alam, Saurabh Sharma, Saeed Mufleh Alnasser, Abdulkarim Saeed Alqahatn, Aqsa Mujaddadi, Ahmar Raza, Shibili Nuhmani","doi":"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_74_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Walking is a fundamental physical activity with significant health implications. Backward gait training (BGT) has emerged as a novel approach with potential benefits, yet its effects in comparison to traditional forward gait training (FGT) remain uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of BGT on body composition, cardiopulmonary fitness, and inflammatory and metabolic markers in adults. A comprehensive search across electronic databases was conducted following the Preferred Publishing Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing BGT with FGT in adults were included. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. The analysis included a total of 379 male participants across the studies. The meta-analysis demonstrated significant changes in body composition and inflammatory marker outcomes, which included waist-to-height ratio (standardized mean difference [SMD]-1.18, 95% confidence interval [CI]-1.89-0.48, I2 = 83%, <i>P</i> < 0.01), body mass index (SMD-0.55, 95% CI-0.77-0.32, I2= 0%, <i>P</i> < 0.01), and C-reactive protein (SMD-0.98, 95% CI-1.28-0.70, I2= 0%, <i>P</i> < 0.01). In addition, the qualitative review revealed potential enhancements in cardiopulmonary fitness and metabolic markers following BGT. While the results suggest potential benefits of BGT on body composition and inflammatory markers, the evidence remains limited and heterogeneous. Further robust research with diverse populations, longer intervention periods, and comprehensive outcome assessments is essential to elucidate the true impact of BGT and its utility for promoting overall health and well-being in adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":13938,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","volume":"14 2","pages":"101-111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11245139/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_74_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Walking is a fundamental physical activity with significant health implications. Backward gait training (BGT) has emerged as a novel approach with potential benefits, yet its effects in comparison to traditional forward gait training (FGT) remain uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of BGT on body composition, cardiopulmonary fitness, and inflammatory and metabolic markers in adults. A comprehensive search across electronic databases was conducted following the Preferred Publishing Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing BGT with FGT in adults were included. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. The analysis included a total of 379 male participants across the studies. The meta-analysis demonstrated significant changes in body composition and inflammatory marker outcomes, which included waist-to-height ratio (standardized mean difference [SMD]-1.18, 95% confidence interval [CI]-1.89-0.48, I2 = 83%, P < 0.01), body mass index (SMD-0.55, 95% CI-0.77-0.32, I2= 0%, P < 0.01), and C-reactive protein (SMD-0.98, 95% CI-1.28-0.70, I2= 0%, P < 0.01). In addition, the qualitative review revealed potential enhancements in cardiopulmonary fitness and metabolic markers following BGT. While the results suggest potential benefits of BGT on body composition and inflammatory markers, the evidence remains limited and heterogeneous. Further robust research with diverse populations, longer intervention periods, and comprehensive outcome assessments is essential to elucidate the true impact of BGT and its utility for promoting overall health and well-being in adults.

后退步态训练对成年人身体成分、心肺功能、炎症和代谢指标的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
步行是一项对健康有重大影响的基本体育活动。后退步态训练(BGT)是一种具有潜在益处的新方法,但与传统的正向步态训练(FGT)相比,其效果仍不确定。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估后向步态训练对成年人身体成分、心肺功能、炎症和代谢指标的影响。研究人员按照《系统综述和荟萃分析首选出版项目》指南在电子数据库中进行了全面检索。纳入了在成人中比较 BGT 与 FGT 的随机临床试验 (RCT)。方法学质量采用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具进行评估。证据的确定性采用推荐、评估、发展和评价分级法进行评估。分析共纳入了 379 名男性参与者。荟萃分析表明,身体成分和炎症指标结果发生了显著变化,其中包括腰围与身高比(标准化平均差 [SMD]-1.18,95% 置信区间 [CI]-1.89-0.48,I2= 83%,P <0.01)、体重指数(SMD-0.55,95% CI-0.77-0.32,I2= 0%,P <0.01)和 C 反应蛋白(SMD-0.98,95% CI-1.28-0.70,I2= 0%,P <0.01)。此外,定性审查显示,BGT 有可能增强心肺功能和代谢指标。虽然研究结果表明 BGT 对身体成分和炎症指标有潜在的益处,但证据仍然有限且不尽相同。要阐明 BGT 的真正影响及其对促进成人整体健康和幸福的作用,必须对不同人群、更长的干预期和全面的结果评估开展进一步的有力研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: IJCIIS encourages research, education and dissemination of knowledge in the field of Critical Illness and Injury Science across the world thus promoting translational research by striking a synergy between basic science, clinical medicine and public health. The Journal intends to bring together scientists and academicians in the emergency intensive care and promote translational synergy between Laboratory Science, Clinical Medicine and Public Health. The Journal invites Original Articles, Clinical Investigations, Epidemiological Analysis, Data Protocols, Case Reports, Clinical Photographs, review articles and special commentaries. Students, Residents, Academicians, Public Health experts and scientists are all encouraged to be a part of this initiative by contributing, reviewing and promoting scientific works and science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信