Polypharmacology prediction: the long road toward comprehensively anticipating small-molecule selectivity to de-risk drug discovery.

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Leticia Manen-Freixa, Albert A Antolin
{"title":"Polypharmacology prediction: the long road toward comprehensively anticipating small-molecule selectivity to de-risk drug discovery.","authors":"Leticia Manen-Freixa, Albert A Antolin","doi":"10.1080/17460441.2024.2376643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Small molecules often bind to multiple targets, a behavior termed polypharmacology. Anticipating polypharmacology is essential for drug discovery since unknown off-targets can modulate safety and efficacy - profoundly affecting drug discovery success. Unfortunately, experimental methods to assess selectivity present significant limitations and drugs still fail in the clinic due to unanticipated off-targets. Computational methods are a cost-effective, complementary approach to predict polypharmacology.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the state of polypharmacology prediction and discuss its strengths and limitations, covering both classical cheminformatics methods and bioinformatic approaches. The authors review available data sources, paying close attention to their different coverage. The authors then discuss major algorithms grouped by the types of data that they exploit using selected examples.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Polypharmacology prediction has made impressive progress over the last decades and contributed to identify many off-targets. However, data incompleteness currently limits most approaches to comprehensively predict selectivity. Moreover, our limited agreement on model assessment challenges the identification of the best algorithms - which at present show modest performance in prospective real-world applications. Despite these limitations, the exponential increase of multidisciplinary Big Data and AI hold much potential to better polypharmacology prediction and de-risk drug discovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":12267,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17460441.2024.2376643","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Small molecules often bind to multiple targets, a behavior termed polypharmacology. Anticipating polypharmacology is essential for drug discovery since unknown off-targets can modulate safety and efficacy - profoundly affecting drug discovery success. Unfortunately, experimental methods to assess selectivity present significant limitations and drugs still fail in the clinic due to unanticipated off-targets. Computational methods are a cost-effective, complementary approach to predict polypharmacology.

Areas covered: This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the state of polypharmacology prediction and discuss its strengths and limitations, covering both classical cheminformatics methods and bioinformatic approaches. The authors review available data sources, paying close attention to their different coverage. The authors then discuss major algorithms grouped by the types of data that they exploit using selected examples.

Expert opinion: Polypharmacology prediction has made impressive progress over the last decades and contributed to identify many off-targets. However, data incompleteness currently limits most approaches to comprehensively predict selectivity. Moreover, our limited agreement on model assessment challenges the identification of the best algorithms - which at present show modest performance in prospective real-world applications. Despite these limitations, the exponential increase of multidisciplinary Big Data and AI hold much potential to better polypharmacology prediction and de-risk drug discovery.

多药理学预测:全面预测小分子选择性以降低药物研发风险的漫长之路。
简介:小分子药物通常与多个靶点结合,这种行为被称为多药理作用。预测多药理作用对药物发现至关重要,因为未知的非靶点会影响药物的安全性和有效性,从而严重影响药物发现的成功率。遗憾的是,评估选择性的实验方法存在很大的局限性,药物在临床上仍会因未预期的非靶点而失败。计算方法是预测多药理作用的一种具有成本效益的补充方法:本综述旨在全面概述多药理预测的现状,并讨论其优势和局限性,涵盖经典的化学信息学方法和生物信息学方法。作者回顾了现有的数据源,并密切关注其不同的覆盖范围。然后,作者根据所利用的数据类型,通过精选实例对主要算法进行了讨论:过去几十年来,多药理学预测取得了令人瞩目的进展,为确定许多非靶点做出了贡献。然而,数据的不完整性目前限制了大多数方法全面预测选择性。此外,我们在模型评估方面达成的一致意见有限,这对确定最佳算法提出了挑战--目前这些算法在未来的实际应用中表现一般。尽管存在这些局限性,但多学科大数据和人工智能的指数级增长为更好地进行多药理学预测和降低药物发现风险带来了巨大潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
1.60%
发文量
78
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery (ISSN 1746-0441 [print], 1746-045X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on novel technologies involved in the drug discovery process, leading to new leads and reduced attrition rates. Each article is structured to incorporate the author’s own expert opinion on the scope for future development. The Editors welcome: Reviews covering chemoinformatics; bioinformatics; assay development; novel screening technologies; in vitro/in vivo models; structure-based drug design; systems biology Drug Case Histories examining the steps involved in the preclinical and clinical development of a particular drug The audience consists of scientists and managers in the healthcare and pharmaceutical industry, academic pharmaceutical scientists and other closely related professionals looking to enhance the success of their drug candidates through optimisation at the preclinical level.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信