Requirement-driven supplier selection: a multi-criteria QFD-based approach under epistemic and stochastic uncertainties

IF 4.4 3区 管理学 Q1 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Jian-Peng Chang, Heng-Xin Ren, Luis Martínez, Witold Pedrycz, Zhen-Song Chen
{"title":"Requirement-driven supplier selection: a multi-criteria QFD-based approach under epistemic and stochastic uncertainties","authors":"Jian-Peng Chang,&nbsp;Heng-Xin Ren,&nbsp;Luis Martínez,&nbsp;Witold Pedrycz,&nbsp;Zhen-Song Chen","doi":"10.1007/s10479-024-06131-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Supplier selection (SS) has emerged as a critical challenge for companies aiming to enhance the operational management of their supply chains, a task that has grown in complexity with the advent of Industry 4.0 and the ongoing digital transformation. Recognizing the gaps in current literature—specifically, the lack of consideration for stakeholders' expectations in guiding SS, as well as the inadequate handling of epistemic and stochastic uncertainties—this paper introduces a multiple-criteria Quality Function Deployment (QFD)-based model for SS. To address epistemic uncertainty, we put forward a novel subjective judgment representation method, which is named as linguistic term set integrated with discrete subjective probability distribution (LTS-DSPD), to enable decision-makers to express their judgments in a manner that is both simpler and more nuanced. Furthermore, we also give the elicitation methods and computing techniques for LTS-DSPD. Then, we integrate stakeholders’ requirements, along with their preferences and expectations for these requirements to inform and guide SS. To effectively operationalize this guidance, we design the QFD-based methods to transform stakeholders' inputs into the assessment criteria for SS, the weights of criteria, and the expectations for the performances of suppliers on each criterion, respectively. To address stochastic uncertainty, we have developed an innovative methodology for characterizing it, and adopt prospect theory to quantify the overall utility of alternative suppliers. The paper concludes with a case study to demonstrate its practical application and effectiveness in streamlining SS process.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8215,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Operations Research","volume":"342 2","pages":"1079 - 1128"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Operations Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10479-024-06131-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Supplier selection (SS) has emerged as a critical challenge for companies aiming to enhance the operational management of their supply chains, a task that has grown in complexity with the advent of Industry 4.0 and the ongoing digital transformation. Recognizing the gaps in current literature—specifically, the lack of consideration for stakeholders' expectations in guiding SS, as well as the inadequate handling of epistemic and stochastic uncertainties—this paper introduces a multiple-criteria Quality Function Deployment (QFD)-based model for SS. To address epistemic uncertainty, we put forward a novel subjective judgment representation method, which is named as linguistic term set integrated with discrete subjective probability distribution (LTS-DSPD), to enable decision-makers to express their judgments in a manner that is both simpler and more nuanced. Furthermore, we also give the elicitation methods and computing techniques for LTS-DSPD. Then, we integrate stakeholders’ requirements, along with their preferences and expectations for these requirements to inform and guide SS. To effectively operationalize this guidance, we design the QFD-based methods to transform stakeholders' inputs into the assessment criteria for SS, the weights of criteria, and the expectations for the performances of suppliers on each criterion, respectively. To address stochastic uncertainty, we have developed an innovative methodology for characterizing it, and adopt prospect theory to quantify the overall utility of alternative suppliers. The paper concludes with a case study to demonstrate its practical application and effectiveness in streamlining SS process.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

需求驱动的供应商选择:认识和随机不确定性下基于 QFD 的多标准方法
供应商选择(SS)已成为旨在加强其供应链运营管理的公司所面临的一项重要挑战,随着工业 4.0 的到来和正在进行的数字化转型,这项任务变得越来越复杂。本文认识到当前文献中存在的不足,特别是在指导供应链服务时缺乏对利益相关者期望的考虑,以及对认识不确定性和随机不确定性的处理不当,因此介绍了一种基于质量功能部署(QFD)的供应链服务多重标准模型。针对认识上的不确定性,我们提出了一种新颖的主观判断表示方法,即语言术语集与离散主观概率分布集成(LTS-DSPD),使决策者能够以更简单、更细致的方式表达他们的判断。此外,我们还给出了 LTS-DSPD 的诱导方法和计算技术。然后,我们整合利益相关者的要求以及他们对这些要求的偏好和期望,为 SS 提供信息和指导。为了有效实施这种指导,我们设计了基于 QFD 的方法,将利益相关者的输入分别转化为 SS 的评估标准、标准权重以及对供应商在每个标准上的表现的期望。为了解决随机不确定性问题,我们开发了一种创新方法来描述随机不确定性,并采用前景理论来量化备选供应商的整体效用。本文最后通过一个案例研究,展示了该方法在简化 SS 流程方面的实际应用和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Operations Research
Annals of Operations Research 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
596
审稿时长
8.4 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Operations Research publishes peer-reviewed original articles dealing with key aspects of operations research, including theory, practice, and computation. The journal publishes full-length research articles, short notes, expositions and surveys, reports on computational studies, and case studies that present new and innovative practical applications. In addition to regular issues, the journal publishes periodic special volumes that focus on defined fields of operations research, ranging from the highly theoretical to the algorithmic and the applied. These volumes have one or more Guest Editors who are responsible for collecting the papers and overseeing the refereeing process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信