Application of REDECA Framework to Improve Safety and Health of Agricultural Tractor Drivers

Negin Ashrafi, Kamiar Alaei, Greg Placencia, Maryam Pishgar
{"title":"Application of REDECA Framework to Improve Safety and Health of Agricultural Tractor Drivers","authors":"Negin Ashrafi, Kamiar Alaei, Greg Placencia, Maryam Pishgar","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.10.24310227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Despite tremendous efforts, including research, teaching, and extension, toward improving the safety of agricultural tractor drivers, the number of incidents related to agricultural tractor drivers has not declined. This evidence points out an urgent need to explore artificial intelligence (AI) solutions to improve the safety of tractor drivers. Methods: This paper uses 171 Fatality Assessment and Control Evaluation (FACE) reports related to tractor drivers and a new framework called Risk Evolution, Detection, Evaluation, and Control of Accidents (REDECA) to identify existing AI solutions and specific areas where AI solutions are missed and can be developed to reduce incidents and recovery time. Fatality reports of tractor drivers were categorized into six main categories, including run over, pinned by, fall, others (fire and crashes), roll over, and overturn. Each category was then subcategorized based on similarities of incident causes in the reports. Results: The application of the REDECA framework revealed potential AI solutions that could improve the safety of tractor drivers. In all categories, the REDECA framework lacks AI solutions for three elements, including the probability of reducing recovery time in R3, detecting changes between R2 and R3, and intervention to send workers to R2. Except for the run over category, all other categories were missing AI solutions for interventions to prevent entry to the R3 element of the REDECA. In addition, the fall, roll over, and overturn categories lacked AI intervention that minimized damage and recovery in R3. Conclusions: The outcome of this study shows an urgent need to develop AI solutions to improve tractor driver safety.","PeriodicalId":501555,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Occupational and Environmental Health","volume":"244 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Occupational and Environmental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.10.24310227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Despite tremendous efforts, including research, teaching, and extension, toward improving the safety of agricultural tractor drivers, the number of incidents related to agricultural tractor drivers has not declined. This evidence points out an urgent need to explore artificial intelligence (AI) solutions to improve the safety of tractor drivers. Methods: This paper uses 171 Fatality Assessment and Control Evaluation (FACE) reports related to tractor drivers and a new framework called Risk Evolution, Detection, Evaluation, and Control of Accidents (REDECA) to identify existing AI solutions and specific areas where AI solutions are missed and can be developed to reduce incidents and recovery time. Fatality reports of tractor drivers were categorized into six main categories, including run over, pinned by, fall, others (fire and crashes), roll over, and overturn. Each category was then subcategorized based on similarities of incident causes in the reports. Results: The application of the REDECA framework revealed potential AI solutions that could improve the safety of tractor drivers. In all categories, the REDECA framework lacks AI solutions for three elements, including the probability of reducing recovery time in R3, detecting changes between R2 and R3, and intervention to send workers to R2. Except for the run over category, all other categories were missing AI solutions for interventions to prevent entry to the R3 element of the REDECA. In addition, the fall, roll over, and overturn categories lacked AI intervention that minimized damage and recovery in R3. Conclusions: The outcome of this study shows an urgent need to develop AI solutions to improve tractor driver safety.
应用 REDECA 框架改善农用拖拉机驾驶员的安全与健康
导言:尽管在提高农用拖拉机驾驶员安全方面做出了巨大努力,包括研究、教学和推广,但与农用拖拉机驾驶员有关的事故数量并未减少。这些证据表明,迫切需要探索人工智能(AI)解决方案来提高拖拉机驾驶员的安全性。方法:本文利用 171 份与拖拉机驾驶员相关的死亡事故评估与控制评价(FACE)报告,以及一个名为 "事故风险演变、检测、评估与控制"(REDECA)的新框架,来确定现有的人工智能解决方案,以及人工智能解决方案遗漏并可开发的特定领域,以减少事故和恢复时间。拖拉机驾驶员的死亡事故报告被分为六大类,包括碾压、压住、坠落、其他(火灾和撞车)、翻滚和翻车。然后根据报告中事故原因的相似性对每个类别进行细分。结果:REDECA 框架的应用揭示了可以提高拖拉机驾驶员安全的潜在人工智能解决方案。在所有类别中,REDECA 框架缺乏针对三个要素的人工智能解决方案,包括缩短 R3 恢复时间的概率、检测 R2 和 R3 之间的变化以及干预将工人派往 R2。除翻滚类别外,所有其他类别都缺少防止进入 REDECA R3 要素的干预措施的人工智能解决方案。此外,坠落、翻滚和倾覆类别也缺乏人工智能干预,无法最大限度地减少 R3 中的损坏和恢复。结论:这项研究结果表明,迫切需要开发人工智能解决方案来提高拖拉机驾驶员的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信