Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of the Neonatal Sepsis Risk Calculator in a Tertiary Referral Center in Lebanon

IF 0.2 4区 医学 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Yara Neaimeh, Natasha Ard, Darine Daher, Joseph Abourjeili, Maha Makki, Hani Tamim, Faouzi I. Maalouf
{"title":"Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of the Neonatal Sepsis Risk Calculator in a Tertiary Referral Center in Lebanon","authors":"Yara Neaimeh, Natasha Ard, Darine Daher, Joseph Abourjeili, Maha Makki, Hani Tamim, Faouzi I. Maalouf","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1788322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>\n<b>Objective</b> Early onset sepsis (EOS) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the newborn period. This has led to overinvestigation and antibiotic overuse, which remains a concern in EOS management. Sepsis risk calculator (SRC), a tool validated in American and European populations, aids physicians in sepsis risk stratification and has been shown to decrease antibiotics overuse for EOS. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the SRC in a tertiary referral center in Lebanon.</p> <p>\n<b>Methods</b> This was a single-center retrospective cohort study, conducted at a tertiary medical center in Beirut, Lebanon, that included infants born at more than 34 weeks' gestational age between January 1, 2017 and January 1, 2019. Data was collected on risk factors for neonatal sepsis and the clinical management performed on each newborn. The SRC was used to calculate a sepsis risk score for each patient. Comparison between actual management performed and SRC recommendation was measured.</p> <p>\n<b>Results</b> We reviewed 3,085 charts, out of which 257 charts were excluded. Patients were stratified into two groups: high sepsis risk and low sepsis risk. Out of the 2,828 patients included, 81 infants (2.9%) had high risk of sepsis, out of which 2 patients had positive blood cultures. There were no patients with a low SRC score who had positive blood cultures. There were no patients who were supposed to receive antibiotics per the SRC recommendation who did not undergo workup for sepsis. Implementing SRC would have prevented antibiotics administration in 42 (1.5%) patients.</p> <p>\n<b>Conclusion</b> SRC was adequately capable of detecting neonates with sepsis without missing actual cases of EOS, providing initial support for its safety in the population studied. Implementing the SRC would result in reduced usage of antibiotics, laboratory tests, and admissions to the neonatal intensive care unit.</p> ","PeriodicalId":16739,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric infectious diseases","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric infectious diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1788322","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective Early onset sepsis (EOS) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the newborn period. This has led to overinvestigation and antibiotic overuse, which remains a concern in EOS management. Sepsis risk calculator (SRC), a tool validated in American and European populations, aids physicians in sepsis risk stratification and has been shown to decrease antibiotics overuse for EOS. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the SRC in a tertiary referral center in Lebanon.

Methods This was a single-center retrospective cohort study, conducted at a tertiary medical center in Beirut, Lebanon, that included infants born at more than 34 weeks' gestational age between January 1, 2017 and January 1, 2019. Data was collected on risk factors for neonatal sepsis and the clinical management performed on each newborn. The SRC was used to calculate a sepsis risk score for each patient. Comparison between actual management performed and SRC recommendation was measured.

Results We reviewed 3,085 charts, out of which 257 charts were excluded. Patients were stratified into two groups: high sepsis risk and low sepsis risk. Out of the 2,828 patients included, 81 infants (2.9%) had high risk of sepsis, out of which 2 patients had positive blood cultures. There were no patients with a low SRC score who had positive blood cultures. There were no patients who were supposed to receive antibiotics per the SRC recommendation who did not undergo workup for sepsis. Implementing SRC would have prevented antibiotics administration in 42 (1.5%) patients.

Conclusion SRC was adequately capable of detecting neonates with sepsis without missing actual cases of EOS, providing initial support for its safety in the population studied. Implementing the SRC would result in reduced usage of antibiotics, laboratory tests, and admissions to the neonatal intensive care unit.

评估黎巴嫩一家三级转诊中心使用新生儿败血症风险计算器的有效性和安全性
早发性败血症(EOS)是新生儿期发病和死亡的一个重要原因。这导致了过度检查和抗生素的过度使用,这仍然是 EOS 管理中的一个问题。脓毒症风险计算器(SRC)是一种在美国和欧洲人群中得到验证的工具,可帮助医生进行脓毒症风险分层,并已证明可减少 EOS 抗生素的过度使用。本研究旨在评估 SRC 在黎巴嫩一家三级转诊中心的有效性和安全性。方法 这是一项单中心回顾性队列研究,在黎巴嫩贝鲁特的一家三级医疗中心进行,研究对象包括 2017 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 1 月 1 日期间胎龄超过 34 周的新生儿。研究收集了有关新生儿败血症风险因素和对每个新生儿进行临床治疗的数据。利用 SRC 计算出每位患者的败血症风险评分。测量了实际实施的管理与 SRC 建议之间的比较。结果 我们查看了 3,085 份病历,其中 257 份病历被排除在外。患者被分为两组:脓毒症高风险组和脓毒症低风险组。在纳入的 2,828 名患者中,81 名婴儿(2.9%)有败血症高风险,其中 2 名患者的血液培养呈阳性。没有低 SRC 评分的患者血液培养呈阳性。没有根据 SRC 建议本应接受抗生素治疗的患者未接受败血症检查。如果实施 SRC,则有 42 例(1.5%)患者可避免使用抗生素。结论 SRC 能够充分检测出患有败血症的新生儿,而不会遗漏实际的 EOS 病例,这为其在所研究人群中的安全性提供了初步支持。实施 SRC 可减少抗生素、实验室检测和新生儿重症监护病房的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pediatric infectious diseases
Journal of Pediatric infectious diseases Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pediatric Infectious Diseases is a peer-reviewed medical journal publishing articles in the field of child infectious diseases. The journal provides an in-depth update on new subjects and current comprehensive coverage of the latest techniques used in diagnosis and treatment of childhood infectious diseases. The following articles will be considered for publication: editorials, original and review articles, rapid communications, letters to the editor and book reviews. The aim of the journal is to share and disseminate knowledge between all disciplines in the field of pediatric infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信