Katarsis: Crítica a las artes escéncias en el Perú by Rubén Quiroz Ávila (review)

IF 0.1 3区 艺术学 0 THEATER
Marin Laufenberg
{"title":"Katarsis: Crítica a las artes escéncias en el Perú by Rubén Quiroz Ávila (review)","authors":"Marin Laufenberg","doi":"10.1353/ltr.2024.a931952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Katarsis: Crítica a las artes escéncias en el Perú</em> by Rubén Quiroz Ávila <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Marin Laufenberg </li> </ul> Quiroz Ávila, Rubén. <em>Katarsis: Crítica a las artes escéncias en el Perú</em>. Lima: Máquina Purísima, 2021. 284 pp. <p>Aptly named, this book allows a retrospective on theatre in Perú leading up to the 2020 global pandemic, when everything changed, including theatrical arts and production. <em>Katarsis: Crítica a las artes escénicas en el Perú</em> is a unique archive of Peruvian theatre, putting in print and under a magnifying glass the theatre scene in Lima and wider Perú in the time period between 2017 and 2020. Rubén Quiroz Ávila has brought together his reviews of theatre works (previously published in the on-line journal <em>Exitosa</em>) in this compendium. These reviews are made available to a wider audience (academic and artistic) in this book, which will not simply disappear into the ether of the Internet. Moreover, these reviews of staged performances capture unique moments in time; if one did not attend the live show, reviews often serve as the only documentation of the performance.</p> <p>Quiroz Ávila includes many details in each brief review (it is a sort of organized index of references)—from the names of cast members and evaluations of their contributions to assessments of lighting, music, scenery, and costume design. Often, he uses the subjective voice of the critic (as can be expected in the genre of theatre review) when speaking about the success of a particular production, the quality of the acting, or the strength of the lighting techniques, for example. While these judgments are less universally useful, they do capture one highly knowledgeable audience member’s experience in a way that might be valuable to scholars interested in audience experience and live reception.</p> <p>Quiroz Ávila broaches a wide array of theatre arts in Perú. The reviews span the scope of university theatre, independent theatre, established theatre spaces and practitioners, children’s theatre, and festivals. Common threads returned to throughout include reflections on theatrical arts and connections between the individual works and the sense of Peruvian identity. <strong>[End Page 153]</strong></p> <p>The reviews often contain moments of reflection on the art of theatre itself. For instance, in a review of a children’s theatre piece, the author examines how spectators choose their seats and the difference it makes for a spectator to be located in closer proximity to a production from the lens of access and privilege. In another review, Quiroz Ávila lists the “rights of the spectator.” In yet another, he highlights the duties of the theatre critic. He also weighs in on the role of theatre in the creation of cultural capital in Perú, seeing it as a receptacle for memories and a mode of constructing a desired collective future.</p> <p>The reader gains a nuanced sense of “peruanidad” in the twenty-first century through the more than 120 individual reviews contained in this volume. One can sense the shadow of violence in the recent past of Perú in some of the reflections. At one point, for example, Ávila Quiroz muses, “La presencia de la muerte no es para nada rara en este país” (91). Or in another moment, touching on corruption, he states, “Los peruanos todavía creemos que tenemos derecho a soñar, a que parte de la esperanza no ha sido destrozada por las situaciones corruptas y violentas en las que estamos inmersos” (96). Ávila Quiroz argues that “universalized” plays and messages do not impact the audience in Perú the same way that locally couched theatre productions do. He argues for the importance of nurturing further theatre in Quechua for a wider audience in the piece “Para un teatro en quechua” (255). And, he constantly reaffirms that theatre is healthy in the Perú of the twenty-first century.</p> <p>One of the most notable contributions of this book lies in its ability to contrast the pre-pandemic theatre scene with that of the height of the pandemic and to thereby underscore the limitations imposed by the pandemic as well as the innovations that it produced. Quiroz Ávila includes several particularly poignant reviews towards the end of the book, including...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":41320,"journal":{"name":"LATIN AMERICAN THEATRE REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LATIN AMERICAN THEATRE REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ltr.2024.a931952","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • Katarsis: Crítica a las artes escéncias en el Perú by Rubén Quiroz Ávila
  • Marin Laufenberg
Quiroz Ávila, Rubén. Katarsis: Crítica a las artes escéncias en el Perú. Lima: Máquina Purísima, 2021. 284 pp.

Aptly named, this book allows a retrospective on theatre in Perú leading up to the 2020 global pandemic, when everything changed, including theatrical arts and production. Katarsis: Crítica a las artes escénicas en el Perú is a unique archive of Peruvian theatre, putting in print and under a magnifying glass the theatre scene in Lima and wider Perú in the time period between 2017 and 2020. Rubén Quiroz Ávila has brought together his reviews of theatre works (previously published in the on-line journal Exitosa) in this compendium. These reviews are made available to a wider audience (academic and artistic) in this book, which will not simply disappear into the ether of the Internet. Moreover, these reviews of staged performances capture unique moments in time; if one did not attend the live show, reviews often serve as the only documentation of the performance.

Quiroz Ávila includes many details in each brief review (it is a sort of organized index of references)—from the names of cast members and evaluations of their contributions to assessments of lighting, music, scenery, and costume design. Often, he uses the subjective voice of the critic (as can be expected in the genre of theatre review) when speaking about the success of a particular production, the quality of the acting, or the strength of the lighting techniques, for example. While these judgments are less universally useful, they do capture one highly knowledgeable audience member’s experience in a way that might be valuable to scholars interested in audience experience and live reception.

Quiroz Ávila broaches a wide array of theatre arts in Perú. The reviews span the scope of university theatre, independent theatre, established theatre spaces and practitioners, children’s theatre, and festivals. Common threads returned to throughout include reflections on theatrical arts and connections between the individual works and the sense of Peruvian identity. [End Page 153]

The reviews often contain moments of reflection on the art of theatre itself. For instance, in a review of a children’s theatre piece, the author examines how spectators choose their seats and the difference it makes for a spectator to be located in closer proximity to a production from the lens of access and privilege. In another review, Quiroz Ávila lists the “rights of the spectator.” In yet another, he highlights the duties of the theatre critic. He also weighs in on the role of theatre in the creation of cultural capital in Perú, seeing it as a receptacle for memories and a mode of constructing a desired collective future.

The reader gains a nuanced sense of “peruanidad” in the twenty-first century through the more than 120 individual reviews contained in this volume. One can sense the shadow of violence in the recent past of Perú in some of the reflections. At one point, for example, Ávila Quiroz muses, “La presencia de la muerte no es para nada rara en este país” (91). Or in another moment, touching on corruption, he states, “Los peruanos todavía creemos que tenemos derecho a soñar, a que parte de la esperanza no ha sido destrozada por las situaciones corruptas y violentas en las que estamos inmersos” (96). Ávila Quiroz argues that “universalized” plays and messages do not impact the audience in Perú the same way that locally couched theatre productions do. He argues for the importance of nurturing further theatre in Quechua for a wider audience in the piece “Para un teatro en quechua” (255). And, he constantly reaffirms that theatre is healthy in the Perú of the twenty-first century.

One of the most notable contributions of this book lies in its ability to contrast the pre-pandemic theatre scene with that of the height of the pandemic and to thereby underscore the limitations imposed by the pandemic as well as the innovations that it produced. Quiroz Ávila includes several particularly poignant reviews towards the end of the book, including...

卡塔西斯:秘鲁表演艺术评论》,作者 Rubén Quiroz Ávila(评论)
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者 Katarsis: Crítica a las artes escéncias en el Perú by Rubén Quiroz Ávila Marin Laufenberg Quiroz Ávila, Rubén.Katarsis: Crítica a las artes escéncias en el Perú。利马:Máquina Purísima, 2021 年。284 pp.这本书的名字恰如其分,它回顾了秘鲁在 2020 年全球大流行之前的戏剧情况,当时一切都发生了变化,包括戏剧艺术和制作。Katarsis:Crítica a las artes escénicas en el Perú》是一本独一无二的秘鲁戏剧档案,将 2017 年至 2020 年期间利马乃至整个秘鲁的戏剧舞台用印刷品和放大镜展示出来。鲁文-基罗斯-阿维拉(Rubén Quiroz Ávila)将他的戏剧作品评论(以前发表在在线期刊《Exitosa》上)汇集到本汇编中。这些评论在本书中向更广泛的读者(学术界和艺术界)提供,而不会简单地消失在互联网的茫茫大海中。此外,这些对舞台表演的评论捕捉到了独特的时间瞬间;如果没有参加现场表演,评论往往是对表演的唯一记录。Quiroz Ávila在每篇简短的评论中都包含了许多细节(这是一种有组织的参考资料索引)--从演员的姓名和对其贡献的评价,到对灯光、音乐、布景和服装设计的评估。在谈到某部作品的成功之处、演员的演技或灯光技术的优势等时,他经常使用评论家的主观声音(这在戏剧评论体裁中是意料之中的)。虽然这些判断并不具有普遍意义,但它们确实捕捉到了一位知识渊博的观众的体验,这对于对观众体验和现场接受感兴趣的学者来说可能很有价值。Quiroz Ávila 广泛涉猎了秘鲁的戏剧艺术。评论涉及大学戏剧、独立戏剧、成熟的戏剧空间和从业者、儿童戏剧和戏剧节。贯穿始终的共同线索包括对戏剧艺术的反思以及个别作品与秘鲁身份意识之间的联系。[评论中经常包含对戏剧艺术本身的反思。例如,在一篇关于儿童剧作品的评论中,作者从机会和特权的角度探讨了观众如何选择座位,以及观众在更近距离观看作品时的不同感受。在另一篇评论中,Quiroz Ávila 列出了 "观众的权利"。在另一篇评论中,他强调了剧评人的职责。他还谈到了戏剧在创造秘鲁文化资本中的作用,认为戏剧是记忆的容器,是构建理想的集体未来的一种模式。通过本卷中的 120 多篇评论,读者对 21 世纪的 "秘鲁 "有了细致入微的了解。从一些评论中,我们可以感受到秘鲁近代暴力的阴影。例如,Ávila Quiroz 曾一度喃喃自语:"在这个国家,死亡的存在并不可怕"(91)。又如,在谈到腐败问题时,他说:"秘鲁人一直认为我们有权利呐喊,我们的部分希望没有被腐败和暴力所摧毁"(96)。Ávila Quiroz 认为,在秘鲁,"普遍化 "的戏剧和信息对观众的影响不如地方戏剧作品。在 "Para un teatro en quechua"(《克丘亚语戏剧》)(255)一文中,他认为必须进一步培育克丘亚语戏剧,以吸引更多观众。他不断重申,戏剧在二十一世纪的秘鲁是健康的。本书最显著的贡献之一在于,它将大流行前的戏剧场景与大流行高峰期的戏剧场景进行了对比,从而强调了大流行所带来的限制以及大流行所产生的创新。Quiroz Ávila 在书的结尾处写了几篇特别有感触的评论,其中包括...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信