An Experimental Investigation of Flexural Performance of FRP Reinforced Concrete Slabs

IF 1.8 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Ferhat Aydın, Elif Boru, Numan Durmaz, Ali Sarıbıyık, Mehmet Sarıbıyık, Emine Aydın
{"title":"An Experimental Investigation of Flexural Performance of FRP Reinforced Concrete Slabs","authors":"Ferhat Aydın, Elif Boru, Numan Durmaz, Ali Sarıbıyık, Mehmet Sarıbıyık, Emine Aydın","doi":"10.1007/s40999-024-01013-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the study, flexural performances of FRP reinforced concrete (RC) slabs with different fiber and bar surface properties were investigated. Glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP), Carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP), Aramid fiber reinforced polymer (AFRP) and Basalt fiber reinforced polymer (BFRP) steel reinforcements were used in the reinforcement of the slabs. A total of 27 slabs were produced in the dimensions of 1100–1100–100 mm and with the same reinforcement ratios as FRP and steel reinforcement and were tested with the four-point flexural test method. The flexural strength, moment capacity, toughness and ductility values of the slabs were calculated by determining their flexural behaviour, and the average values were compared. In the comparison, the behaviour of the FRP RC slabs was analysed by taking the steel RC slabs as reference. The effects of FRP fiber type and bar surface properties on slab behaviour were evaluated. The bending load-carrying capacity of AFRP and GFRP RC slabs with ribbed surfaces was 4% higher than those with sand-coated surfaces. In addition, the bending load-carrying capacity of BFRP and CFRP RC slabs with sand-coated surfaces was 13% and 16% higher than those with ribbed surfaces, respectively. The type of failure in slabs varies based on the type of reinforcement and the surface properties of the reinforcement. Three types of failures have been identified: flexural failure, shear failure, and flexural-shear failure. The ductility performance of steel RC slabs has been determined to be the highest, with a value of 9.45. When comparing toughness, sand-coated FRP bars exhibit toughness levels 8–40% higher than ribbed ones. Among the FRP RC slabs, sand-coated CFRP RC slabs provide the greatest contribution to flexural load-carrying capacities.</p>","PeriodicalId":50331,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-024-01013-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the study, flexural performances of FRP reinforced concrete (RC) slabs with different fiber and bar surface properties were investigated. Glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP), Carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP), Aramid fiber reinforced polymer (AFRP) and Basalt fiber reinforced polymer (BFRP) steel reinforcements were used in the reinforcement of the slabs. A total of 27 slabs were produced in the dimensions of 1100–1100–100 mm and with the same reinforcement ratios as FRP and steel reinforcement and were tested with the four-point flexural test method. The flexural strength, moment capacity, toughness and ductility values of the slabs were calculated by determining their flexural behaviour, and the average values were compared. In the comparison, the behaviour of the FRP RC slabs was analysed by taking the steel RC slabs as reference. The effects of FRP fiber type and bar surface properties on slab behaviour were evaluated. The bending load-carrying capacity of AFRP and GFRP RC slabs with ribbed surfaces was 4% higher than those with sand-coated surfaces. In addition, the bending load-carrying capacity of BFRP and CFRP RC slabs with sand-coated surfaces was 13% and 16% higher than those with ribbed surfaces, respectively. The type of failure in slabs varies based on the type of reinforcement and the surface properties of the reinforcement. Three types of failures have been identified: flexural failure, shear failure, and flexural-shear failure. The ductility performance of steel RC slabs has been determined to be the highest, with a value of 9.45. When comparing toughness, sand-coated FRP bars exhibit toughness levels 8–40% higher than ribbed ones. Among the FRP RC slabs, sand-coated CFRP RC slabs provide the greatest contribution to flexural load-carrying capacities.

Abstract Image

玻璃钢加固混凝土板挠曲性能的实验研究
本研究调查了具有不同纤维和棒材表面特性的玻璃纤维增强混凝土(RC)板的抗弯性能。板的加固采用了玻璃纤维增强聚合物(GFRP)、碳纤维增强聚合物(CFRP)、芳纶纤维增强聚合物(AFRP)和玄武岩纤维增强聚合物(BFRP)钢筋。共制作了 27 块板材,尺寸为 1100-1100-100mm,玻璃纤维增强聚合物和钢筋的配筋率相同,并采用四点抗弯试验法进行了测试。通过测定板的抗弯行为,计算出了板的抗弯强度、弯矩容量、韧性和延展性值,并对平均值进行了比较。在比较中,以钢 RC 板为参照,分析了 FRP RC 板的行为。评估了 FRP 纤维类型和棒材表面特性对板坯行为的影响。带肋表面的 AFRP 和 GFRP RC 板的弯曲承载能力比带砂涂层表面的板高出 4%。此外,表面涂砂的 BFRP 和 CFRP RC 板的抗弯承载力分别比表面带肋的板高 13% 和 16%。板的破坏类型因钢筋类型和钢筋表面特性而异。已确定的失效类型有三种:挠曲失效、剪切失效和挠曲-剪切失效。钢筋混凝土板的延性性能最高,达到 9.45。在比较韧性时,涂砂玻璃钢条的韧性比带肋玻璃钢条高 8-40%。在玻璃钢 RC 板中,涂砂 CFRP RC 板对抗弯承载能力的贡献最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
83
审稿时长
15 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Civil Engineering, The official publication of Iranian Society of Civil Engineering and Iran University of Science and Technology is devoted to original and interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of civil engineering with similar emphasis on all topics.The journal provides a forum for the International Civil Engineering Community to present and discuss matters of major interest e.g. new developments in civil regulations, The topics are included but are not necessarily restricted to :- Structures- Geotechnics- Transportation- Environment- Earthquakes- Water Resources- Construction Engineering and Management, and New Materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信