Tocilizumab provides dual benefits in treating immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated arthritis and preventing relapse during ICI rechallenge: the TAPIR study

Pierre-Florent Petit, Douglas Daoudlarian, Sofiya Latifyan, Hasna Bouchaab, Nuria Mederos, Jacqueline Doms, Karim Abdelhamid, Nabila Ferahta, Lucrezia Mencarelli, Victor Joo, Robin Bartolini, Athina Stravodimou, Keyvan Shabafrouz, Giuseppe Pantaleo, Solange Peters, Michel Obeid
{"title":"Tocilizumab provides dual benefits in treating immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated arthritis and preventing relapse during ICI rechallenge: the TAPIR study","authors":"Pierre-Florent Petit, Douglas Daoudlarian, Sofiya Latifyan, Hasna Bouchaab, Nuria Mederos, Jacqueline Doms, Karim Abdelhamid, Nabila Ferahta, Lucrezia Mencarelli, Victor Joo, Robin Bartolini, Athina Stravodimou, Keyvan Shabafrouz, Giuseppe Pantaleo, Solange Peters, Michel Obeid","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.12.24310208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-associated arthritis (ICI-AR) significantly affects quality of life and often requires discontinuation of ICI therapy and initiation of immunosuppressive treatment. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the dual efficacy of tocilizumab (TCZ), an anti-IL-6R agent, in the treatment of ICI-AR and the prevention of relapses after ICI rechallenge.\nMethods. This retrospective single-center study was conducted at our institution from 2020 to the end of 2023. We identified 26 patients who developed ICI-AR. The primary objectives were to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of TCZ in the treatment of ICI-AR in 26 patients and to evaluate the potential of TCZ as secondary prophylaxis during ICI rechallenge in 11 of them. For the treatment of ICI-AR, patients received prednisone (CS) at a low dose of 0.3 mg/kg tapered at 0.05 mg/kg weekly for six weeks until discontinuation. TCZ was administered at a dose of 8 mg/kg every two weeks. In the subgroup receiving secondary prophylaxis (rechallenge n=11, in 10 patients), TCZ was reintroduced at the same dosage of 8 mg/kg bi-weekly concurrently with ICI rechallenge, and without the addition of CS. A control group of patients (rechallenge n=5, in 3 patients) was rechallenged without TCZ. Secondary endpoints included post rechallenge evaluation of ICI duration, reintroduction of CS > 0.1 mg/kg/day, ICI-RA flares, and disease control rate (DCR). An additional explanatory endpoint was the identification of biomarkers predictive of response to TCZ.\nResults. The median age of the patients was 70 years. The median follow-up from ICI initiation was 864 days. ICI regimens included anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy in 17 patients (63%), anti-PD-1 combined with anti-CTLA4 therapy in 8 patients (31%), and anti-PD-1 combined with anti-LAG3 therapy in 1 patient (4%). Among the 20 patients treated with TCZ for ICI-AR, all (100%) achieved an ACR70 response rate, defined as greater than 70% improvement, at 10 weeks. Additionally, 81% of these patients achieved steroid-free remission after 24 weeks on TCZ. The median follow-up period was 552 days in rechallenged patients. The ICI rechallenge regimens (n=16) included anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy in thirteen cases (81%) and combination therapy in three cases (19%). The results demonstrated a reduction in ICI-AR relapses upon ICI rechallenge in patients receiving TCZ prophylaxis as compared to patients who did not receive prophylaxis (17% vs 40%). In addition, the requirement for CS at doses exceeding 0.1 mg/kg/day was completely abolished with prophylaxis (0% vs 20%), and the mean duration of ICI treatment was notably extended from 113 days to 206 days. The 12-month post-rechallenge outcomes showed a disease control rate (DCR) of 77%. Importantly, during TCZ prophylaxis, CXCL9 levels remained elevated, showing no decline from their levels at the onset of ICI-AR. Additionally, elevations of IL-6 and CXCL10 levels were exclusively observed in patients who developed new irAEs during the period of TCZ prophylaxis.\nConclusion. In addition to its efficacy in treating ICI-AR, TCZ demonstrated efficacy as a secondary prophylactic agent, preventing the recurrence of ICI-AR symptoms and lengthening ICI treatment duration after ICI rechallenge. The use of TCZ as a secondary prophylaxis may represent a promising strategy to extend patient exposure to ICI treatments and maximize therapeutic benefit.","PeriodicalId":501437,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Oncology","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.12.24310208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-associated arthritis (ICI-AR) significantly affects quality of life and often requires discontinuation of ICI therapy and initiation of immunosuppressive treatment. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the dual efficacy of tocilizumab (TCZ), an anti-IL-6R agent, in the treatment of ICI-AR and the prevention of relapses after ICI rechallenge. Methods. This retrospective single-center study was conducted at our institution from 2020 to the end of 2023. We identified 26 patients who developed ICI-AR. The primary objectives were to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of TCZ in the treatment of ICI-AR in 26 patients and to evaluate the potential of TCZ as secondary prophylaxis during ICI rechallenge in 11 of them. For the treatment of ICI-AR, patients received prednisone (CS) at a low dose of 0.3 mg/kg tapered at 0.05 mg/kg weekly for six weeks until discontinuation. TCZ was administered at a dose of 8 mg/kg every two weeks. In the subgroup receiving secondary prophylaxis (rechallenge n=11, in 10 patients), TCZ was reintroduced at the same dosage of 8 mg/kg bi-weekly concurrently with ICI rechallenge, and without the addition of CS. A control group of patients (rechallenge n=5, in 3 patients) was rechallenged without TCZ. Secondary endpoints included post rechallenge evaluation of ICI duration, reintroduction of CS > 0.1 mg/kg/day, ICI-RA flares, and disease control rate (DCR). An additional explanatory endpoint was the identification of biomarkers predictive of response to TCZ. Results. The median age of the patients was 70 years. The median follow-up from ICI initiation was 864 days. ICI regimens included anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy in 17 patients (63%), anti-PD-1 combined with anti-CTLA4 therapy in 8 patients (31%), and anti-PD-1 combined with anti-LAG3 therapy in 1 patient (4%). Among the 20 patients treated with TCZ for ICI-AR, all (100%) achieved an ACR70 response rate, defined as greater than 70% improvement, at 10 weeks. Additionally, 81% of these patients achieved steroid-free remission after 24 weeks on TCZ. The median follow-up period was 552 days in rechallenged patients. The ICI rechallenge regimens (n=16) included anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy in thirteen cases (81%) and combination therapy in three cases (19%). The results demonstrated a reduction in ICI-AR relapses upon ICI rechallenge in patients receiving TCZ prophylaxis as compared to patients who did not receive prophylaxis (17% vs 40%). In addition, the requirement for CS at doses exceeding 0.1 mg/kg/day was completely abolished with prophylaxis (0% vs 20%), and the mean duration of ICI treatment was notably extended from 113 days to 206 days. The 12-month post-rechallenge outcomes showed a disease control rate (DCR) of 77%. Importantly, during TCZ prophylaxis, CXCL9 levels remained elevated, showing no decline from their levels at the onset of ICI-AR. Additionally, elevations of IL-6 and CXCL10 levels were exclusively observed in patients who developed new irAEs during the period of TCZ prophylaxis. Conclusion. In addition to its efficacy in treating ICI-AR, TCZ demonstrated efficacy as a secondary prophylactic agent, preventing the recurrence of ICI-AR symptoms and lengthening ICI treatment duration after ICI rechallenge. The use of TCZ as a secondary prophylaxis may represent a promising strategy to extend patient exposure to ICI treatments and maximize therapeutic benefit.
托西珠单抗在治疗免疫检查点抑制剂相关关节炎和预防 ICI 再挑战期间复发方面具有双重优势:TAPIR 研究
背景。免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)相关关节炎(ICI-AR)严重影响患者的生活质量,通常需要停止ICI治疗并开始免疫抑制治疗。这项回顾性研究旨在评估抗IL-6R药物托西珠单抗(TCZ)治疗ICI-AR和预防ICI再挑战后复发的双重疗效。这项回顾性单中心研究于 2020 年至 2023 年底在我院进行。我们确定了 26 名发生 ICI-AR 的患者。研究的主要目的是评估 TCZ 治疗 26 名患者 ICI-AR 的疗效,并评估 TCZ 作为其中 11 名患者 ICI 再挑战期间二级预防的潜力。为治疗 ICI-AR,患者接受泼尼松(CS)治疗,低剂量为 0.3 毫克/千克,每周减量 0.05 毫克/千克,持续六周直至停药。TCZ 的剂量为每两周 8 毫克/千克。在接受二次预防治疗的亚组(再挑战 n=11,共 10 名患者)中,在 ICI 再挑战的同时,以每两周 8 毫克/千克的相同剂量重新引入 TCZ,但不添加 CS。对照组患者(再挑战 n=5,共 3 名患者)在不使用 TCZ 的情况下进行再挑战。次要终点包括再挑战后评估 ICI 持续时间、重新引入 CS > 0.1 mg/kg/天、ICI-RA 复发和疾病控制率 (DCR)。另一个解释性终点是确定预测对TCZ反应的生物标志物。患者的中位年龄为70岁。从开始接受 ICI 治疗起,中位随访时间为 864 天。ICI 方案包括:17 名患者(63%)接受抗-PD-(L)1 单药治疗,8 名患者(31%)接受抗-PD-1 联合抗 CTLA4 治疗,1 名患者(4%)接受抗-PD-1 联合抗 LAG3 治疗。在使用TCZ治疗ICI-AR的20名患者中,所有患者(100%)在10周时都达到了ACR70反应率,即病情改善超过70%。此外,81%的患者在接受 TCZ 治疗 24 周后实现了无类固醇缓解。再挑战患者的中位随访期为 552 天。ICI再挑战疗法(n=16)包括抗PD-(L)1单一疗法13例(81%)和联合疗法3例(19%)。结果表明,与未接受预防性治疗的患者相比,接受TCZ预防性治疗的患者在ICI-AR再复查时的ICI-AR复发率有所下降(17% vs 40%)。此外,预防性治疗完全消除了对剂量超过 0.1 毫克/千克/天的 CS 的需求(0% 对 20%),ICI 治疗的平均持续时间明显从 113 天延长到 206 天。复查后12个月的结果显示,疾病控制率(DCR)为77%。重要的是,在 TCZ 预防期间,CXCL9 水平仍在升高,与 ICI-AR 开始时的水平相比没有下降。此外,IL-6和CXCL10水平的升高只出现在TCZ预防期间出现新的虹膜AEs的患者身上。除治疗 ICI-AR 的疗效外,TCZ 还可作为辅助预防药物,防止 ICI-AR 症状复发,并延长 ICI 再挑战后的 ICI 治疗时间。将 TCZ 用作辅助预防药物可能是一种很有前景的策略,可以延长患者接受 ICI 治疗的时间,最大限度地提高治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信