Hybrid CSMA/CA and HCCA uplink medium access control protocol for VLC based heterogeneous users

IF 4.5 3区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Saswati Paramita , Arani Bhattacharya , Anand Srivastava , Vivek Ashok Bohara
{"title":"Hybrid CSMA/CA and HCCA uplink medium access control protocol for VLC based heterogeneous users","authors":"Saswati Paramita ,&nbsp;Arani Bhattacharya ,&nbsp;Anand Srivastava ,&nbsp;Vivek Ashok Bohara","doi":"10.1016/j.comcom.2024.06.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Light fidelity (LiFi) is an emerging wireless networking technology of visible light communication (VLC) paradigm for multiuser communication. This technology enables high data rates due to the availability of large visible light spectrum. While current studies have shown the potential for LiFi technology, they borrow the MAC-layer protocols from traditional WiFi. However, a number of prior studies have shown the challenges faced by the MAC-layer of WiFi in the presence of large number and types of devices. In this work, we show that the hybrid-coordination-function-controlled-access (HCCA) MAC protocol in LiFi provides higher throughput than the traditional CSMA/CA mechanism to user devices. We also show that HCCA has the limitation of higher message overhead in the presence of a large number of devices. We also evaluate the collision probability, busy channel probability, and delay for HCCA and CSMA/CA MAC protocol. We utilize both theoretical analysis and extensive simulations to study these performance tradeoffs and identify a threshold when a LiFi access point should switch to HCCA from CSMA/CA and vice-versa. Finally, based on our findings, we design a hybrid-MAC mechanism that switches between HCCA and CSMA/CA based on the number and type of devices present. Our evaluation shows that this hybrid mechanism can outperform both HCCA and CSMA/CA individually in the presence of different number of devices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55224,"journal":{"name":"Computer Communications","volume":"225 ","pages":"Pages 54-64"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Communications","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140366424002275","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Light fidelity (LiFi) is an emerging wireless networking technology of visible light communication (VLC) paradigm for multiuser communication. This technology enables high data rates due to the availability of large visible light spectrum. While current studies have shown the potential for LiFi technology, they borrow the MAC-layer protocols from traditional WiFi. However, a number of prior studies have shown the challenges faced by the MAC-layer of WiFi in the presence of large number and types of devices. In this work, we show that the hybrid-coordination-function-controlled-access (HCCA) MAC protocol in LiFi provides higher throughput than the traditional CSMA/CA mechanism to user devices. We also show that HCCA has the limitation of higher message overhead in the presence of a large number of devices. We also evaluate the collision probability, busy channel probability, and delay for HCCA and CSMA/CA MAC protocol. We utilize both theoretical analysis and extensive simulations to study these performance tradeoffs and identify a threshold when a LiFi access point should switch to HCCA from CSMA/CA and vice-versa. Finally, based on our findings, we design a hybrid-MAC mechanism that switches between HCCA and CSMA/CA based on the number and type of devices present. Our evaluation shows that this hybrid mechanism can outperform both HCCA and CSMA/CA individually in the presence of different number of devices.

基于 VLC 的异构用户的 CSMA/CA 和 HCCA 混合上行链路介质访问控制协议
光保真(LiFi)是一种用于多用户通信的新兴可见光通信(VLC)无线网络技术。由于可获得大量可见光频谱,该技术可实现高数据传输速率。虽然目前的研究显示了 LiFi 技术的潜力,但它们借用了传统 WiFi 的 MAC 层协议。然而,之前的一些研究表明,WiFi 的 MAC 层在存在大量和各种类型的设备时面临着挑战。在这项工作中,我们证明了 LiFi 中的混合协调功能控制访问(HCCA)MAC 协议比传统的 CSMA/CA 机制为用户设备提供了更高的吞吐量。我们还表明,在有大量设备的情况下,HCCA 存在信息开销较高的限制。我们还评估了 HCCA 和 CSMA/CA MAC 协议的碰撞概率、忙道概率和延迟。我们利用理论分析和大量仿真来研究这些性能权衡,并确定 LiFi 接入点从 CSMA/CA 切换到 HCCA 的阈值,反之亦然。最后,基于我们的研究结果,我们设计了一种混合 MAC 机制,可根据设备的数量和类型在 HCCA 和 CSMA/CA 之间切换。我们的评估结果表明,在设备数量不同的情况下,这种混合机制的性能优于 HCCA 和 CSMA/CA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computer Communications
Computer Communications 工程技术-电信学
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
397
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Computer and Communications networks are key infrastructures of the information society with high socio-economic value as they contribute to the correct operations of many critical services (from healthcare to finance and transportation). Internet is the core of today''s computer-communication infrastructures. This has transformed the Internet, from a robust network for data transfer between computers, to a global, content-rich, communication and information system where contents are increasingly generated by the users, and distributed according to human social relations. Next-generation network technologies, architectures and protocols are therefore required to overcome the limitations of the legacy Internet and add new capabilities and services. The future Internet should be ubiquitous, secure, resilient, and closer to human communication paradigms. Computer Communications is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes high-quality scientific articles (both theory and practice) and survey papers covering all aspects of future computer communication networks (on all layers, except the physical layer), with a special attention to the evolution of the Internet architecture, protocols, services, and applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信