Establishing consensus on patient- and family-centered care in adult intensive care units: A Delphi survey

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Søs Bohart MSc. RN , Anne Højager Nielsen RN, PhD (Associate professor) , Jette Led Sørensen MD, PhD, MMEd (Professor) , Anne Sofie Andreasen MD, PhD (Associate professor) , Tina Waldau MD, MPG, PhD , Ann Merete Møller MD (Professor) , Thordis Thomsen RN, PhD (Professor)
{"title":"Establishing consensus on patient- and family-centered care in adult intensive care units: A Delphi survey","authors":"Søs Bohart MSc. RN ,&nbsp;Anne Højager Nielsen RN, PhD (Associate professor) ,&nbsp;Jette Led Sørensen MD, PhD, MMEd (Professor) ,&nbsp;Anne Sofie Andreasen MD, PhD (Associate professor) ,&nbsp;Tina Waldau MD, MPG, PhD ,&nbsp;Ann Merete Møller MD (Professor) ,&nbsp;Thordis Thomsen RN, PhD (Professor)","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.154859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To establish consensus between intensive care unit (ICU) experts on concrete patient- and family-centered care statements for adult patients and relatives in the ICU.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>We did a three-round Delphi survey with a panel of ICU health care professionals from 23 ICUs in Denmark. In round 1, participants answered 20 open-ended questions, based on existing evidence. Analysis of their responses generated close-ended statements, which participants primary rated on a five-point-Likert-scale, from very important to not important at all. In rounds 2 and 3., consensus was predefined as ≥75% of participants rating a statement important.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Sixty-nine participated: 38 nurses, 24 physicians, and four occupational and physiotherapists. In total 96%, 90% and 72% answered the first, second, and third rounds, respectively.</p><p>In round 1, participants answers resulted in &gt;3000 statements that were analyzed into 82 condensed statements. After participants rated the statements in round 2 and 3, 47 statements reached consensus as important.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The 47 statements rated to be important included interdisciplinary approaches to systematic information sharing and consultations with patients and family-members, with the aim being to accommodate patients and family-members´ individual needs throughout the ICU stay.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of critical care","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 154859"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883944124003460/pdfft?md5=5e08369d8ba20ba01bc7205cde949ad9&pid=1-s2.0-S0883944124003460-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of critical care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883944124003460","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To establish consensus between intensive care unit (ICU) experts on concrete patient- and family-centered care statements for adult patients and relatives in the ICU.

Materials and methods

We did a three-round Delphi survey with a panel of ICU health care professionals from 23 ICUs in Denmark. In round 1, participants answered 20 open-ended questions, based on existing evidence. Analysis of their responses generated close-ended statements, which participants primary rated on a five-point-Likert-scale, from very important to not important at all. In rounds 2 and 3., consensus was predefined as ≥75% of participants rating a statement important.

Results

Sixty-nine participated: 38 nurses, 24 physicians, and four occupational and physiotherapists. In total 96%, 90% and 72% answered the first, second, and third rounds, respectively.

In round 1, participants answers resulted in >3000 statements that were analyzed into 82 condensed statements. After participants rated the statements in round 2 and 3, 47 statements reached consensus as important.

Conclusions

The 47 statements rated to be important included interdisciplinary approaches to systematic information sharing and consultations with patients and family-members, with the aim being to accommodate patients and family-members´ individual needs throughout the ICU stay.

在成人重症监护病房建立以患者和家庭为中心的护理共识:德尔菲调查
目的让重症监护室(ICU)专家就重症监护室成人患者和亲属以患者和家属为中心的具体护理声明达成共识。材料和方法我们对来自丹麦 23 家重症监护室的重症监护室医护人员进行了三轮德尔菲调查。在第一轮调查中,参与者根据现有证据回答了 20 个开放式问题。对他们的回答进行分析后,得出了封闭式陈述,参与者根据五点李克特量表(从非常重要到完全不重要)对这些陈述进行了初评。在第二轮和第三轮中,共识被预先定义为≥75%的参与者认为某项陈述重要:结果 69 人参加了调查:38 名护士、24 名医生、4 名职业和物理治疗师。共有 96%、90% 和 72% 的参与者分别回答了第一轮、第二轮和第三轮的问题。在第一轮中,参与者回答了 >3000条陈述,并将其分析为82条浓缩陈述。在第二轮和第三轮中,参与者对这些陈述进行了评分,最终有 47 项陈述被一致认为是重要的。结论 这 47 项被评为重要的陈述包括采用跨学科方法与患者和家属进行系统的信息共享和协商,目的是在整个重症监护室住院期间满足患者和家属的个人需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of critical care
Journal of critical care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.70%
发文量
237
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Critical Care, the official publication of the World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine (WFSICCM), is a leading international, peer-reviewed journal providing original research, review articles, tutorials, and invited articles for physicians and allied health professionals involved in treating the critically ill. The Journal aims to improve patient care by furthering understanding of health systems research and its integration into clinical practice. The Journal will include articles which discuss: All aspects of health services research in critical care System based practice in anesthesiology, perioperative and critical care medicine The interface between anesthesiology, critical care medicine and pain Integrating intraoperative management in preparation for postoperative critical care management and recovery Optimizing patient management, i.e., exploring the interface between evidence-based principles or clinical insight into management and care of complex patients The team approach in the OR and ICU System-based research Medical ethics Technology in medicine Seminars discussing current, state of the art, and sometimes controversial topics in anesthesiology, critical care medicine, and professional education Residency Education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信