Is there a relationship between nurses' hand hygiene beliefs, practices and ethical sensitivity?

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Pervin Sahiner Assistant Professor, PhD
{"title":"Is there a relationship between nurses' hand hygiene beliefs, practices and ethical sensitivity?","authors":"Pervin Sahiner Assistant Professor, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.apnr.2024.151813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Hand hygiene is the most important way to prevent health care-associated infections. It is important for all nurses that come in physical contact with patients the most to follow hand hygiene rules.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>This study aimed to determine the relationship between nurses' hand hygiene beliefs and practices and their ethical sensitivity.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>This descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted with nurses working in internal medicine, surgery and intensive care clinics of a university hospital between June and August 2022. A total of 350 nurses participated in the study. A Personal Information Form, the Ethical Sensitivity Questionnaire (ESQ), the Hand Hygiene Practice Inventory (HHPI), and the Hand Hygiene Beliefs Scale (HHBS) were used for data collection.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Findings support that nurses have moderate ethical sensitivity (88.36 ± 26.33), good hand hygiene beliefs (85.60 ± 9.21) and practice (66.14 ± 5.90). Despite there being no statistical significance in evaluating the relationship between hand hygiene practice and ethical sensitivity (<em>p</em> = 0.253, <em>r</em> = −0.061), there was a statically significant inverse relationship between hand hygiene beliefs and ethical sensitivity (<em>p</em> = 0.001, <em>r</em> = −0.172). The hand hygiene compliance score of the nurses who received only ethics training after nursing school (<em>p</em> = 0.000); the hand hygiene belief (<em>p</em> = 0.011) and hand hygiene practice (<em>p</em> = 0.007) scores of those who received both ethics and hand hygiene training were higher.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>It can be said that the ethical sensitivity of nurses does not affect their hand hygiene practices, and the hand hygiene and ethics education they receive after school education increases their hand hygiene beliefs and practices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50740,"journal":{"name":"Applied Nursing Research","volume":"78 ","pages":"Article 151813"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089718972400051X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Hand hygiene is the most important way to prevent health care-associated infections. It is important for all nurses that come in physical contact with patients the most to follow hand hygiene rules.

Aim

This study aimed to determine the relationship between nurses' hand hygiene beliefs and practices and their ethical sensitivity.

Method

This descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted with nurses working in internal medicine, surgery and intensive care clinics of a university hospital between June and August 2022. A total of 350 nurses participated in the study. A Personal Information Form, the Ethical Sensitivity Questionnaire (ESQ), the Hand Hygiene Practice Inventory (HHPI), and the Hand Hygiene Beliefs Scale (HHBS) were used for data collection.

Results

Findings support that nurses have moderate ethical sensitivity (88.36 ± 26.33), good hand hygiene beliefs (85.60 ± 9.21) and practice (66.14 ± 5.90). Despite there being no statistical significance in evaluating the relationship between hand hygiene practice and ethical sensitivity (p = 0.253, r = −0.061), there was a statically significant inverse relationship between hand hygiene beliefs and ethical sensitivity (p = 0.001, r = −0.172). The hand hygiene compliance score of the nurses who received only ethics training after nursing school (p = 0.000); the hand hygiene belief (p = 0.011) and hand hygiene practice (p = 0.007) scores of those who received both ethics and hand hygiene training were higher.

Conclusions

It can be said that the ethical sensitivity of nurses does not affect their hand hygiene practices, and the hand hygiene and ethics education they receive after school education increases their hand hygiene beliefs and practices.

护士的手部卫生观念、实践与道德敏感性之间是否存在关系?
背景手部卫生是预防医疗相关感染的最重要方法。本研究旨在确定护士的手部卫生观念和实践与他们的道德敏感性之间的关系。本研究是一项描述性横断面研究,研究对象是 2022 年 6 月至 8 月期间在一所大学医院的内科、外科和重症监护诊所工作的护士。共有 350 名护士参与了研究。研究采用了个人信息表、道德敏感性问卷(ESQ)、手部卫生实践量表(HHPI)和手部卫生信念量表(HHBS)进行数据收集。结果结果表明,护士具有中等程度的道德敏感性(88.36 ± 26.33)、良好的手部卫生信念(85.60 ± 9.21)和实践(66.14 ± 5.90)。尽管手部卫生实践与道德敏感性之间的关系评估没有统计学意义(p = 0.253,r = -0.061),但手部卫生信念与道德敏感性之间存在统计学意义显著的反向关系(p = 0.001,r = -0.172)。护校毕业后只接受过伦理培训的护士手卫生依从性得分(p = 0.000);同时接受伦理和手卫生培训的护士手卫生信念(p = 0.011)和手卫生实践(p = 0.007)得分均较高。结论可以说,护士的伦理敏感性并不影响其手卫生实践,护校毕业后接受的手卫生和伦理教育提高了其手卫生信念和实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Nursing Research
Applied Nursing Research 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Applied Nursing Research presents original, peer-reviewed research findings clearly and directly for clinical applications in all nursing specialties. Regular features include "Ask the Experts," research briefs, clinical methods, book reviews, news and announcements, and an editorial section. Applied Nursing Research covers such areas as pain management, patient education, discharge planning, nursing diagnosis, job stress in nursing, nursing influence on length of hospital stay, and nurse/physician collaboration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信