Exploring European decarbonisation pathways in the Power Decisions Game

IF 4.6 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Hauke T. J. Henke, Francesco Gardumi, Ólavur Ellefsen, Marita Lítlá, Bo Lærke, Kenneth Karlsson
{"title":"Exploring European decarbonisation pathways in the Power Decisions Game","authors":"Hauke T. J. Henke,&nbsp;Francesco Gardumi,&nbsp;Ólavur Ellefsen,&nbsp;Marita Lítlá,&nbsp;Bo Lærke,&nbsp;Kenneth Karlsson","doi":"10.1186/s13705-024-00469-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Article 12 of the Paris Agreement summons the signing parties to co-operate in improving the education of their citizens on climate change and related matters. The article thereby acknowledges the importance of citizens’ support and understanding of climate change and needed measures to fight climate change. This work aims to inform European citizens on how climate change-related policies affect the power sector in Europe. For this purpose, a serious game, based on sound principles of energy systems analysis, has been developed to allow players to explore how key policy decisions affect capacity mix, investment needs, and electricity costs.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The game is based on more than 1700 scenarios run through an open-source and accessible, yet technologically detailed, myopic energy system optimisation model for the electricity supply in the EU27 + 3. The game allows the user to take the role of a decision-maker and make decisions in 2020, 2030, and 2040 regarding the usage of CCS, biomass imports, cross-border electricity transmission and the pace of emission reductions. The user is then presented with economic, social, and environmental impacts of these choices. These impacts are, for example, measured and illustrated in the development of accumulated CO<sub>2</sub> emissions per capita, levelised cost of electricity, and investment need per citizen.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The Power Decisions Game provides a first-of-its-kind open-source infrastructure that allows non-modellers to explore the impact of key decisions and preferences on the design of the future European power system. Furthermore, it provides insights on the consequences of short-sighted decision making. The game can be used to facilitate policy-science discussions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":539,"journal":{"name":"Energy, Sustainability and Society","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://energsustainsoc.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s13705-024-00469-w","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy, Sustainability and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13705-024-00469-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Article 12 of the Paris Agreement summons the signing parties to co-operate in improving the education of their citizens on climate change and related matters. The article thereby acknowledges the importance of citizens’ support and understanding of climate change and needed measures to fight climate change. This work aims to inform European citizens on how climate change-related policies affect the power sector in Europe. For this purpose, a serious game, based on sound principles of energy systems analysis, has been developed to allow players to explore how key policy decisions affect capacity mix, investment needs, and electricity costs.

Results

The game is based on more than 1700 scenarios run through an open-source and accessible, yet technologically detailed, myopic energy system optimisation model for the electricity supply in the EU27 + 3. The game allows the user to take the role of a decision-maker and make decisions in 2020, 2030, and 2040 regarding the usage of CCS, biomass imports, cross-border electricity transmission and the pace of emission reductions. The user is then presented with economic, social, and environmental impacts of these choices. These impacts are, for example, measured and illustrated in the development of accumulated CO2 emissions per capita, levelised cost of electricity, and investment need per citizen.

Conclusion

The Power Decisions Game provides a first-of-its-kind open-source infrastructure that allows non-modellers to explore the impact of key decisions and preferences on the design of the future European power system. Furthermore, it provides insights on the consequences of short-sighted decision making. The game can be used to facilitate policy-science discussions.

在电力决策游戏中探索欧洲脱碳路径
背景《巴黎协定》第 12 条呼吁各签署方开展合作,改善其公民在气候变化及相关问题上的教育。因此,该条款承认公民支持和理解气候变化以及应对气候变化所需措施的重要性。这项工作旨在让欧洲公民了解气候变化相关政策如何影响欧洲的电力部门。为此,我们根据能源系统分析的合理原则,开发了一个严肃游戏,让玩家探索关键政策决定如何影响产能组合、投资需求和电力成本。结果该游戏基于 1700 多个情景,通过一个开源、可访问、但技术细节详细的近视能源系统优化模型,对欧盟 27+3 的电力供应进行优化。游戏允许用户扮演决策者的角色,在 2020 年、2030 年和 2040 年就二氧化碳捕获和储存的使用、生物质进口、跨境电力传输和减排速度做出决策。然后,用户将看到这些选择对经济、社会和环境的影响。例如,这些影响可以通过人均二氧化碳累积排放量、平准化电力成本和每个公民的投资需求来衡量和说明。 结论电力决策游戏提供了一个同类首创的开源基础设施,允许非建模者探索关键决策和偏好对未来欧洲电力系统设计的影响。此外,它还提供了关于短视决策后果的见解。该游戏可用于促进政策科学讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy, Sustainability and Society
Energy, Sustainability and Society Energy-Energy Engineering and Power Technology
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
4.10%
发文量
45
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy, Sustainability and Society is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the brand SpringerOpen. It covers topics ranging from scientific research to innovative approaches for technology implementation to analysis of economic, social and environmental impacts of sustainable energy systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信