Implications of opioid-sparing medications in critically ill patients: A scoping review.

Gabriella Gambadoro, Brian J Kopp, Brian L Erstad
{"title":"Implications of opioid-sparing medications in critically ill patients: A scoping review.","authors":"Gabriella Gambadoro, Brian J Kopp, Brian L Erstad","doi":"10.1016/j.medine.2024.06.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this scoping review was to evaluate literature involving opioid-sparing medications in critically ill patients with a focus on clinically meaningful outcomes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Scoping review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Intensive care unit.</p><p><strong>Patients or participants: </strong>Adult patients in an intensive care unit setting.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Main variables of interest: </strong>PubMed and Cochrane Library were searched from October 1, 2019 to June 1, 2023. Inclusion criteria consisted of randomized controlled trials evaluating adjunctive analgesic use in adult patients in an intensive care unit setting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 343 citations and titles identified in the initial search, with 328 remaining after removal of duplicates, 294 excluded at title and abstract screening, 34 available for full text review, and six included in the scoping review. Most studies reported modest reductions in opioid use as a secondary endpoint. Improvement in clinical outcomes such as reduction in duration of mechanical ventilation or delirium were reported in two trials with dexmedetomidine.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In recently published trials of adjunctive agents in critically ill patients, opioid-sparing effects were small. Data to support improvements in clinical outcomes remains limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":94139,"journal":{"name":"Medicina intensiva","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medine.2024.06.020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this scoping review was to evaluate literature involving opioid-sparing medications in critically ill patients with a focus on clinically meaningful outcomes.

Design: Scoping review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews.

Setting: Intensive care unit.

Patients or participants: Adult patients in an intensive care unit setting.

Interventions: None.

Main variables of interest: PubMed and Cochrane Library were searched from October 1, 2019 to June 1, 2023. Inclusion criteria consisted of randomized controlled trials evaluating adjunctive analgesic use in adult patients in an intensive care unit setting.

Results: There were 343 citations and titles identified in the initial search, with 328 remaining after removal of duplicates, 294 excluded at title and abstract screening, 34 available for full text review, and six included in the scoping review. Most studies reported modest reductions in opioid use as a secondary endpoint. Improvement in clinical outcomes such as reduction in duration of mechanical ventilation or delirium were reported in two trials with dexmedetomidine.

Conclusions: In recently published trials of adjunctive agents in critically ill patients, opioid-sparing effects were small. Data to support improvements in clinical outcomes remains limited.

重症患者使用阿片类药物的意义:范围综述。
目的本范围综述旨在评估重症患者使用阿片类药物的相关文献,重点关注有临床意义的结果:设计:采用系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目扩展进行范围界定综述:重症监护病房:干预措施:无:干预措施:无:从2019年10月1日至2023年6月1日对PubMed和Cochrane图书馆进行了检索。纳入标准包括评估重症监护室环境中成年患者辅助镇痛剂使用情况的随机对照试验:初步检索发现了 343 篇引文和标题,去除重复内容后剩余 328 篇,标题和摘要筛选排除了 294 篇,34 篇可供全文审阅,6 篇纳入了范围界定审查。大多数研究将阿片类药物使用量的适度减少作为次要终点。在两项使用右美托咪定的试验中,临床结果有所改善,如缩短了机械通气时间或谵妄:结论:在最近发表的重症患者辅助用药试验中,阿片类药物的节省效果很小。结论:在最近发表的重症患者辅助用药试验中,阿片类药物的节省效果很小,支持临床效果改善的数据仍然有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信