Quantifying the insurance value for rare diseases: Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jason Shafrin, Suhail Thahir, Alexa C Klimchak, Ivana Audhya, Lauren E Sedita, John A Romley
{"title":"Quantifying the insurance value for rare diseases: Duchenne muscular dystrophy.","authors":"Jason Shafrin, Suhail Thahir, Alexa C Klimchak, Ivana Audhya, Lauren E Sedita, John A Romley","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2024.89584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To quantify the magnitude of an ISPOR novel value element, insurance value, as applied to new treatments for a rare, severe disease with pediatric onset: Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective survey of individuals planning to have children in the future.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey was administered to US adults (aged ≥ 21 years) planning to have a child in the future to elicit willingness to pay (WTP) for insurance coverage for a new hypothetical DMD treatment that improved mortality and morbidity relative to the current standard of care. To identify an indifference point between status quo insurance and insurance with additional cost that would cover the treatment if respondents had a child with DMD, a multiple random staircase design was used. Insurance value-the value individuals receive from a reduction in future health risks-was calculated as the difference between respondent's WTP and what a risk-neutral individual would pay. The risk-neutral value was the product of the (1) probability of having a child with DMD (decision weighted), (2) quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained from the new treatment, and (3) WTP per QALY.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 207 respondents, 80.2% (n = 166) were aged 25 to 44 years, and 59.9% (n = 124) were women. WTP for insurance coverage of the hypothetical treatment was $973 annually, whereas the decision-weighted risk-neutral value was $452 per year. Thus, insurance value constituted 53.5% ($520) of value for new DMD treatments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Individuals planning to have children in the future are willing to pay more for insurance coverage of novel DMD treatments than is assumed under risk-neutral, QALY-based frameworks.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Managed Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2024.89584","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To quantify the magnitude of an ISPOR novel value element, insurance value, as applied to new treatments for a rare, severe disease with pediatric onset: Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD).

Study design: Prospective survey of individuals planning to have children in the future.

Methods: A survey was administered to US adults (aged ≥ 21 years) planning to have a child in the future to elicit willingness to pay (WTP) for insurance coverage for a new hypothetical DMD treatment that improved mortality and morbidity relative to the current standard of care. To identify an indifference point between status quo insurance and insurance with additional cost that would cover the treatment if respondents had a child with DMD, a multiple random staircase design was used. Insurance value-the value individuals receive from a reduction in future health risks-was calculated as the difference between respondent's WTP and what a risk-neutral individual would pay. The risk-neutral value was the product of the (1) probability of having a child with DMD (decision weighted), (2) quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained from the new treatment, and (3) WTP per QALY.

Results: Among 207 respondents, 80.2% (n = 166) were aged 25 to 44 years, and 59.9% (n = 124) were women. WTP for insurance coverage of the hypothetical treatment was $973 annually, whereas the decision-weighted risk-neutral value was $452 per year. Thus, insurance value constituted 53.5% ($520) of value for new DMD treatments.

Conclusions: Individuals planning to have children in the future are willing to pay more for insurance coverage of novel DMD treatments than is assumed under risk-neutral, QALY-based frameworks.

量化罕见疾病的保险价值:杜氏肌营养不良症。
目标:量化ISPOR新价值元素 "保险价值 "的大小,并将其应用于一种罕见的儿科重症疾病的新疗法:研究设计:研究设计:对计划在未来生育的个人进行前瞻性调查:对计划将来要孩子的美国成年人(年龄≥ 21 岁)进行了一项调查,以了解他们是否愿意为一种假定的 DMD 新疗法支付保险费用(WTP),这种新疗法与目前的治疗标准相比可提高死亡率和发病率。为了在维持现状的保险和如果受访者有一个 DMD 患儿将支付额外费用的保险之间确定一个冷漠点,我们采用了多重随机阶梯设计。保险价值--个人从降低未来健康风险中获得的价值--被计算为受访者的 WTP 与风险中性的个人支付金额之间的差额。风险中性价值是以下三者的乘积:(1) 生下 DMD 患儿的概率(决策加权);(2) 从新疗法中获得的质量调整生命年(QALYs);(3) 每 QALY 的 WTP:在 207 名受访者中,80.2%(n = 166)年龄在 25 至 44 岁之间,59.9%(n = 124)为女性。假设治疗保险的 WTP 为每年 973 美元,而决策加权风险中性值为每年 452 美元。因此,保险价值占DMD新疗法价值的53.5%(520美元):结论:计划在未来生育子女的个人愿意为新型 DMD 治疗支付的保险费用高于基于 QALY 的风险中性框架下的假设费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Managed Care
American Journal of Managed Care 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Managed Care is an independent, peer-reviewed publication dedicated to disseminating clinical information to managed care physicians, clinical decision makers, and other healthcare professionals. Its aim is to stimulate scientific communication in the ever-evolving field of managed care. The American Journal of Managed Care addresses a broad range of issues relevant to clinical decision making in a cost-constrained environment and examines the impact of clinical, management, and policy interventions and programs on healthcare and economic outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信