Evolving Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Hip Fracture Outcomes: A Retrospective Comparison of Pre, Early, and Late Pandemic Timepoints.

IF 2 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Trevor Case, Mikayla Kricfalusi, David Ruckle, Jacob Razzouk, Alden Dahan, Joseph G Elsissy, Brian A Schneiderman
{"title":"Evolving Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Hip Fracture Outcomes: A Retrospective Comparison of Pre, Early, and Late Pandemic Timepoints.","authors":"Trevor Case, Mikayla Kricfalusi, David Ruckle, Jacob Razzouk, Alden Dahan, Joseph G Elsissy, Brian A Schneiderman","doi":"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hospital systems were strained during the COVID-19 pandemic, and although previous studies have shown that surgical outcomes in healthy hip fracture patients were unaffected in the initial months of the pandemic, subsequent data are limited. This study examined the evolution of hip fracture care throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review (level III evidence) was done of surgically treated adult hip fractures at a Level 1 academic trauma center from January 2019 to September 2022, stratified into three groups: pre, early, and late pandemic. Continuous variables were evaluated with the Student t-test and one-way analysis of variance, categorical variables were evaluated with chi-squared, P < 0.05 considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Late pandemic patients remained in the hospital 30.1 hours longer than early pandemic patients and 35.7 hours longer than prepandemic patients (P = 0.03). High-energy fractures decreased in the early pandemic, then increased in late pandemic (P < 0.01). Early pandemic patients experienced more myocardial infarctions (P < 0.01). No significant differences in time to surgery, revision surgery, 90-day mortality, or other adverse events were noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To our knowledge, this is the longest study evaluating hip fracture outcomes throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. These results are indicative of an overburdened regional health system less capable of facilitating patient disposition.</p>","PeriodicalId":45062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews","volume":"8 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11239150/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Hospital systems were strained during the COVID-19 pandemic, and although previous studies have shown that surgical outcomes in healthy hip fracture patients were unaffected in the initial months of the pandemic, subsequent data are limited. This study examined the evolution of hip fracture care throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: A retrospective review (level III evidence) was done of surgically treated adult hip fractures at a Level 1 academic trauma center from January 2019 to September 2022, stratified into three groups: pre, early, and late pandemic. Continuous variables were evaluated with the Student t-test and one-way analysis of variance, categorical variables were evaluated with chi-squared, P < 0.05 considered significant.

Results: Late pandemic patients remained in the hospital 30.1 hours longer than early pandemic patients and 35.7 hours longer than prepandemic patients (P = 0.03). High-energy fractures decreased in the early pandemic, then increased in late pandemic (P < 0.01). Early pandemic patients experienced more myocardial infarctions (P < 0.01). No significant differences in time to surgery, revision surgery, 90-day mortality, or other adverse events were noted.

Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the longest study evaluating hip fracture outcomes throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. These results are indicative of an overburdened regional health system less capable of facilitating patient disposition.

COVID-19 大流行对髋部骨折结果的影响不断变化:大流行前、早、晚时间点的回顾性比较。
简介:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,医院系统十分紧张,尽管之前的研究表明,在大流行的最初几个月,健康髋部骨折患者的手术效果未受影响,但随后的数据却十分有限。本研究考察了 COVID-19 大流行期间髋部骨折护理的演变情况:方法:对一家一级学术创伤中心从 2019 年 1 月至 2022 年 9 月接受手术治疗的成人髋部骨折进行了回顾性研究(III 级证据),并将其分为三组:大流行前、大流行早期和大流行晚期。连续变量采用学生 t 检验和单因素方差分析,分类变量采用卡方检验,P < 0.05 为显著性差异:大流行后期患者的住院时间比大流行早期患者多 30.1 小时,比大流行前期患者多 35.7 小时(P = 0.03)。高能量骨折在大流行早期有所减少,而在大流行晚期则有所增加(P < 0.01)。大流行早期的患者发生心肌梗死的比例更高(P < 0.01)。在手术时间、翻修手术、90天死亡率或其他不良事件方面没有发现明显差异:据我们所知,这是评估 COVID-19 大流行期间髋部骨折结果的时间最长的研究。这些结果表明,地区医疗系统负担过重,无法为患者的处置提供便利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
282
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信