A Novel Deep Learning-based Artificial Intelligence System for Interpreting Urolithiasis in Computed Tomography.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Jin Kim, Chan Woo Kwak, Saangyong Uhmn, Junghoon Lee, Sangjun Yoo, Min Chul Cho, Hwancheol Son, Hyeon Jeong, Min Soo Choo
{"title":"A Novel Deep Learning-based Artificial Intelligence System for Interpreting Urolithiasis in Computed Tomography.","authors":"Jin Kim, Chan Woo Kwak, Saangyong Uhmn, Junghoon Lee, Sangjun Yoo, Min Chul Cho, Hwancheol Son, Hyeon Jeong, Min Soo Choo","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2024.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Our aim was to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) system for detection of urolithiasis in computed tomography (CT) images using advanced deep learning capable of real-time calculation of stone parameters such as volume and density, which are essential for treatment decisions. The performance of the system was compared to that of urologists in emergency room (ER) scenarios.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Axial CT images for patients who underwent stone surgery between August 2022 and July 2023 comprised the data set, which was divided into 70% for training, 10% for internal validation, and 20% for testing. Two urologists and an AI specialist annotated stones using Labelimg for ground-truth data. The YOLOv4 architecture was used for training, with acceleration via an RTX 4900 graphics processing unit (GPU). External validation was performed using CT images for 100 patients with suspected urolithiasis.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>The AI system was trained on 39 433 CT images, of which 9.1% were positive. The system achieved accuracy of 95%, peaking with a 1:2 positive-to-negative sample ratio. In a validation set of 5736 images (482 positive), accuracy remained at 95%. Misses (2.6%) were mainly irregular stones. False positives (3.4%) were often due to artifacts or calcifications. External validation using 100 CT images from the ER revealed accuracy of 94%; cases that were missed were mostly ureterovesical junction stones, which were not included in the training set. The AI system surpassed human specialists in speed, analyzing 150 CT images in 13 s, versus 38.6 s for evaluation by urologists and 23 h for formal reading. The AI system calculated stone volume in 0.2 s, versus 77 s for calculation by urologists.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>Our AI system, which uses advanced deep learning, assists in diagnosing urolithiasis with 94% accuracy in real clinical settings and has potential for rapid diagnosis using standard consumer-grade GPUs.</p><p><strong>Patient summary: </strong>We developed a new AI (artificial intelligence) system that can quickly and accurately detect kidney stones in CT (computed tomography) scans. Testing showed that this system is highly effective, with accuracy of 94% for real cases in the emergency department. It is much faster than traditional methods and provides rapid and reliable results to help doctors in making better treatment decisions for their patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2024.07.003","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Our aim was to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) system for detection of urolithiasis in computed tomography (CT) images using advanced deep learning capable of real-time calculation of stone parameters such as volume and density, which are essential for treatment decisions. The performance of the system was compared to that of urologists in emergency room (ER) scenarios.

Methods: Axial CT images for patients who underwent stone surgery between August 2022 and July 2023 comprised the data set, which was divided into 70% for training, 10% for internal validation, and 20% for testing. Two urologists and an AI specialist annotated stones using Labelimg for ground-truth data. The YOLOv4 architecture was used for training, with acceleration via an RTX 4900 graphics processing unit (GPU). External validation was performed using CT images for 100 patients with suspected urolithiasis.

Key findings and limitations: The AI system was trained on 39 433 CT images, of which 9.1% were positive. The system achieved accuracy of 95%, peaking with a 1:2 positive-to-negative sample ratio. In a validation set of 5736 images (482 positive), accuracy remained at 95%. Misses (2.6%) were mainly irregular stones. False positives (3.4%) were often due to artifacts or calcifications. External validation using 100 CT images from the ER revealed accuracy of 94%; cases that were missed were mostly ureterovesical junction stones, which were not included in the training set. The AI system surpassed human specialists in speed, analyzing 150 CT images in 13 s, versus 38.6 s for evaluation by urologists and 23 h for formal reading. The AI system calculated stone volume in 0.2 s, versus 77 s for calculation by urologists.

Conclusions and clinical implications: Our AI system, which uses advanced deep learning, assists in diagnosing urolithiasis with 94% accuracy in real clinical settings and has potential for rapid diagnosis using standard consumer-grade GPUs.

Patient summary: We developed a new AI (artificial intelligence) system that can quickly and accurately detect kidney stones in CT (computed tomography) scans. Testing showed that this system is highly effective, with accuracy of 94% for real cases in the emergency department. It is much faster than traditional methods and provides rapid and reliable results to help doctors in making better treatment decisions for their patients.

基于深度学习的新型人工智能系统,用于解读计算机断层扫描中的尿路结石。
背景和目的:我们的目的是开发一种人工智能(AI)系统,利用先进的深度学习技术在计算机断层扫描(CT)图像中检测尿路结石,该系统能够实时计算结石的体积和密度等参数,这些参数对治疗决策至关重要。该系统的性能与急诊室(ER)场景中泌尿科医生的性能进行了比较:数据集由 2022 年 8 月至 2023 年 7 月期间接受结石手术的患者的轴向 CT 图像组成,其中 70% 用于训练,10% 用于内部验证,20% 用于测试。两名泌尿科医生和一名人工智能专家使用 Labelimg 对结石进行了标注,作为基础真实数据。训练使用 YOLOv4 架构,并通过 RTX 4900 图形处理器(GPU)进行加速。使用 100 名疑似尿路结石患者的 CT 图像进行了外部验证:人工智能系统在 39 433 张 CT 图像上进行了训练,其中 9.1% 为阳性图像。该系统的准确率达到 95%,阳性样本与阴性样本的比例为 1:2。在由 5736 张图像(482 张为阳性)组成的验证集中,准确率保持在 95%。漏检(2.6%)主要是不规则结石。假阳性(3.4%)通常是由于伪影或钙化造成的。使用急诊室的 100 张 CT 图像进行的外部验证显示,准确率为 94%;漏诊病例主要是输尿管与肾盂交界处的结石,这些结石未被纳入训练集。人工智能系统的分析速度超过了人类专家,分析150张CT图像只需13秒,而泌尿科医生的评估时间为38.6秒,正式阅读时间为23小时。人工智能系统计算结石体积的时间为 0.2 秒,而泌尿科医生计算结石体积的时间为 77 秒:我们的人工智能系统采用了先进的深度学习技术,在实际临床环境中辅助诊断泌尿系结石的准确率高达 94%,并有望使用标准消费级 GPU 进行快速诊断。患者总结:我们开发了一种新型 AI(人工智能)系统,可以快速准确地检测 CT(计算机断层扫描)扫描中的肾结石。测试表明,该系统非常有效,在急诊科的真实病例中准确率高达 94%。它比传统方法快得多,能提供快速可靠的结果,帮助医生为病人做出更好的治疗决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European urology focus
European urology focus Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
274
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: European Urology Focus is a new sister journal to European Urology and an official publication of the European Association of Urology (EAU). EU Focus will publish original articles, opinion piece editorials and topical reviews on a wide range of urological issues such as oncology, functional urology, reconstructive urology, laparoscopy, robotic surgery, endourology, female urology, andrology, paediatric urology and sexual medicine. The editorial team welcome basic and translational research articles in the field of urological diseases. Authors may be solicited by the Editor directly. All submitted manuscripts will be peer-reviewed by a panel of experts before being considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信