Prophylactic use of liposomal amphotericin B in children and adolescents undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: A 10-years single center experience

Laura G.Y. Rotte , Coco C.H. de Koning , Yvette G.T. Loeffen , Marc B. Bierings , Jaap Jan Boelens , Caroline A. Lindemans , Tom F.W. Wolfs
{"title":"Prophylactic use of liposomal amphotericin B in children and adolescents undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: A 10-years single center experience","authors":"Laura G.Y. Rotte ,&nbsp;Coco C.H. de Koning ,&nbsp;Yvette G.T. Loeffen ,&nbsp;Marc B. Bierings ,&nbsp;Jaap Jan Boelens ,&nbsp;Caroline A. Lindemans ,&nbsp;Tom F.W. Wolfs","doi":"10.1016/j.ejcped.2024.100175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Azoles are recommended as antifungal prophylaxis in decreasing the incidence of invasive fungal disease (IFD) in high-risk patients in pediatric oncology, including patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). However, azole related toxicity, pharmacological interactions with immunosuppressive medication and conditioning regimen and growing incidence of azole resistance makes this antifungal agent not ideal in the transplant setting. This study reports on the contemporary incidence and outcome of IFD after allogeneic HCT in children with prophylactic liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This single-center retrospective study included all patients transplanted between 2012 and 2022. Primary endpoint was the incidence of IFD until hospital discharge post-transplant. Secondary aims were the incidence of IFD and survival 180 days after allogeneic HCT, the evaluation of toxicity of L-AMB and further risk factors for development of IFD during antifungal prophylaxis. Descriptive statistics were performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>161 pediatric patients received L-AMB. Incidence of breakthrough IFD post-transplant was 7.5 % (12/161). The 12 cases comprised of three invasive yeast infections (1.9 %), three probable (1.9 %) and six possible (3.7 %) mold infections. Adverse events were in 22.4 % of the patients, most of them mild and reversible. Discontinuation of L-AMB occurred in 2.5 % (4/161) of the patients due to severe hypersensitivity reactions.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The risk of breakthrough IFD in pediatric patients undergoing allogeneic HCT under L-AMB prophylaxis is comparable with the reported risk under first line recommendation drugs for antifungal prophylaxis. If no hypersensitivity reaction occurs, L-AMB is tolerated with manageable side effects. This antifungal agent should therefore be considered as an alternative option to azoles in pediatric allogeneic HCT recipients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94314,"journal":{"name":"EJC paediatric oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772610X24000345/pdfft?md5=8f3b20ab25e8b4a0f652436bc6bf2f1a&pid=1-s2.0-S2772610X24000345-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJC paediatric oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772610X24000345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Azoles are recommended as antifungal prophylaxis in decreasing the incidence of invasive fungal disease (IFD) in high-risk patients in pediatric oncology, including patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). However, azole related toxicity, pharmacological interactions with immunosuppressive medication and conditioning regimen and growing incidence of azole resistance makes this antifungal agent not ideal in the transplant setting. This study reports on the contemporary incidence and outcome of IFD after allogeneic HCT in children with prophylactic liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB).

Methods

This single-center retrospective study included all patients transplanted between 2012 and 2022. Primary endpoint was the incidence of IFD until hospital discharge post-transplant. Secondary aims were the incidence of IFD and survival 180 days after allogeneic HCT, the evaluation of toxicity of L-AMB and further risk factors for development of IFD during antifungal prophylaxis. Descriptive statistics were performed.

Results

161 pediatric patients received L-AMB. Incidence of breakthrough IFD post-transplant was 7.5 % (12/161). The 12 cases comprised of three invasive yeast infections (1.9 %), three probable (1.9 %) and six possible (3.7 %) mold infections. Adverse events were in 22.4 % of the patients, most of them mild and reversible. Discontinuation of L-AMB occurred in 2.5 % (4/161) of the patients due to severe hypersensitivity reactions.

Conclusions

The risk of breakthrough IFD in pediatric patients undergoing allogeneic HCT under L-AMB prophylaxis is comparable with the reported risk under first line recommendation drugs for antifungal prophylaxis. If no hypersensitivity reaction occurs, L-AMB is tolerated with manageable side effects. This antifungal agent should therefore be considered as an alternative option to azoles in pediatric allogeneic HCT recipients.

在接受异体造血细胞移植的儿童和青少年中预防性使用两性霉素 B 脂质体:十年单中心经验
背景唑类药物被推荐作为抗真菌预防药物,以降低儿童肿瘤科高危患者(包括接受异基因造血细胞移植(HCT)的患者)的侵袭性真菌病(IFD)发病率。然而,唑类药物的相关毒性、与免疫抑制药物和调理方案的药理相互作用以及唑类药物耐药性的不断增加,使得这种抗真菌药物在移植环境中的应用并不理想。本研究报告了预防性两性霉素 B 脂质体(L-AMB)治疗儿童异基因 HCT 后 IFD 的当代发生率和结果。主要终点是移植后出院前的IFD发生率。次要目标是异基因造血干细胞移植后180天的IFD发生率和存活率、L-AMB毒性评估以及抗真菌预防期间IFD发生的进一步风险因素。结果161名儿科患者接受了L-AMB治疗。移植后突破性 IFD 的发生率为 7.5%(12/161)。这 12 例中包括 3 例侵袭性酵母感染(1.9%)、3 例可能感染(1.9%)和 6 例可能感染(3.7%)的霉菌。22.4%的患者出现了不良反应,其中大部分症状轻微且可逆。结论接受异基因 HCT 的儿科患者在使用 L-AMB 预防时发生突破性 IFD 的风险与报告的一线推荐抗真菌预防药物的风险相当。如果没有发生超敏反应,L-AMB 的耐受性和副作用都是可控的。因此,在小儿异基因造血干细胞移植受者中,这种抗真菌药物应被视为唑类药物的替代选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信