Why do citizens not prefer to use e-scooters? Views of the public in the Netherlands

IF 5.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 TRANSPORTATION
Taşkın Dirsehan
{"title":"Why do citizens not prefer to use e-scooters? Views of the public in the Netherlands","authors":"Taşkın Dirsehan","doi":"10.1016/j.tbs.2024.100863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>E-scooters, a burgeoning form of micromobility, are revolutionizing urban transportation systems globally, particularly in the post-pandemic world. The surge in e-scooter adoption introduces novel regulatory challenges for local authorities. Numerous recent studies cater to these policy needs by exploring e-scooter use. However, scant attention has been paid to non-users’ perspectives, which is crucial to understand comprehensively the effect of e-scooters on urban environments. Issues such as accidents, parking problems, and others, which concern city-dwellers, require close attention. To address this research gap, we used a Q-methodology study to examine the diverse views among residents of the Netherlands. Twenty-one respondents ranked 34 statements pertaining to their disincentives to e-scooter use and elucidated their rankings in a follow-up survey. The study unearthed three distinct viewpoints: (1) “environmentalists” deem e-scooters as environmentally unfriendly, (2) “materialist” exhibit a preference for personal vehicle ownership over shared transport, and (3) “socializers” perceive e-scooters as unsuitable for larger groups. These findings set the stage for potential research directions and underline the importance of incorporating diverse public perceptions in micromobility policymaking.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51534,"journal":{"name":"Travel Behaviour and Society","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 100863"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X24001261/pdfft?md5=1e49e86be405bc6b7ba1f06b2bff34fc&pid=1-s2.0-S2214367X24001261-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Travel Behaviour and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X24001261","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

E-scooters, a burgeoning form of micromobility, are revolutionizing urban transportation systems globally, particularly in the post-pandemic world. The surge in e-scooter adoption introduces novel regulatory challenges for local authorities. Numerous recent studies cater to these policy needs by exploring e-scooter use. However, scant attention has been paid to non-users’ perspectives, which is crucial to understand comprehensively the effect of e-scooters on urban environments. Issues such as accidents, parking problems, and others, which concern city-dwellers, require close attention. To address this research gap, we used a Q-methodology study to examine the diverse views among residents of the Netherlands. Twenty-one respondents ranked 34 statements pertaining to their disincentives to e-scooter use and elucidated their rankings in a follow-up survey. The study unearthed three distinct viewpoints: (1) “environmentalists” deem e-scooters as environmentally unfriendly, (2) “materialist” exhibit a preference for personal vehicle ownership over shared transport, and (3) “socializers” perceive e-scooters as unsuitable for larger groups. These findings set the stage for potential research directions and underline the importance of incorporating diverse public perceptions in micromobility policymaking.

为什么市民不喜欢使用电动摩托车?荷兰公众的观点
电动滑板车是一种新兴的微型交通方式,正在彻底改变全球城市交通系统,特别是在大流行后的世界。电动摩托车的激增给地方政府带来了新的监管挑战。最近的许多研究通过探讨电动摩托车的使用,满足了这些政策需求。然而,人们很少关注非使用者的观点,而这对于全面了解电动滑板车对城市环境的影响至关重要。城市居民关心的事故、停车问题等问题需要密切关注。针对这一研究空白,我们采用 Q 方法研究了荷兰居民的不同观点。21 名受访者对 34 项与电动摩托车使用的抑制因素相关的陈述进行了排序,并在后续调查中阐明了他们的排序。研究发现了三种截然不同的观点:(1) "环保主义者 "认为电动摩托车不环保;(2) "物质主义者 "倾向于个人拥有车辆而非共享交通工具;(3) "社交主义者 "认为电动摩托车不适合大型团体使用。这些发现为潜在的研究方向奠定了基础,并强调了在制定微型交通政策时纳入不同公众看法的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: Travel Behaviour and Society is an interdisciplinary journal publishing high-quality original papers which report leading edge research in theories, methodologies and applications concerning transportation issues and challenges which involve the social and spatial dimensions. In particular, it provides a discussion forum for major research in travel behaviour, transportation infrastructure, transportation and environmental issues, mobility and social sustainability, transportation geographic information systems (TGIS), transportation and quality of life, transportation data collection and analysis, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信