Anagenesis and the tyrant pedigree: A response to “Re-analysis of a dataset refutes claims of anagenesis within Tyrannosaurus-line tyrannosaurines (Theropoda, Tyrannosauridae)”

IF 1.9 3区 地球科学 Q1 GEOLOGY
Elías A. Warshaw , Daniela Barrera Guevara , Denver W. Fowler
{"title":"Anagenesis and the tyrant pedigree: A response to “Re-analysis of a dataset refutes claims of anagenesis within Tyrannosaurus-line tyrannosaurines (Theropoda, Tyrannosauridae)”","authors":"Elías A. Warshaw ,&nbsp;Daniela Barrera Guevara ,&nbsp;Denver W. Fowler","doi":"10.1016/j.cretres.2024.105957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Taxonomic diversity in the derived tyrannosaurine <em>Daspletosaurus</em> has been hypothesized to represent a variety of evolutionary patterns by different authors. The recent description of <em>D. wilsoni</em>, the third species of this genus, was proposed to support the paraphyly of <em>Daspletosaurus</em> and participation of its species within a single anagenetic lineage terminating at the base of a clade formed by <em>Tyrannosaurus</em> and other gigantic tyrannosaurines (<em>Tarbosaurus</em>, <em>Zhuchengtyrannus</em>). However, a recent reanalysis including additional data has challenged this interpretation, instead recovering <em>Daspletosaurus</em> as a monophyletic sister group to <em>Tyrannosaurus</em> and its closest relatives, characterized by several cladogenetic events. Here we show that incorporating further data and correcting erroneous interpretations of relevant anatomical features overturns this result. Using a novel phylogenetic analysis including additional specimens, we recover a paraphyletic <em>Daspletosaurus</em>, with species of this genus forming successive sister taxa to <em>Tyrannosaurus</em>-line tyrannosaurines. This result facilitates an interpretation of currently recognized <em>Daspletosaurus</em> species as representing a single anagenetic lineage, in agreement with the stratigraphic distribution of relevant specimens and a qualitative analysis of the range of morphological variation observable within <em>D. wilsoni</em>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55207,"journal":{"name":"Cretaceous Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195667124001307/pdfft?md5=70ad0024fc60b7cf58da09c57883dda4&pid=1-s2.0-S0195667124001307-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cretaceous Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195667124001307","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Taxonomic diversity in the derived tyrannosaurine Daspletosaurus has been hypothesized to represent a variety of evolutionary patterns by different authors. The recent description of D. wilsoni, the third species of this genus, was proposed to support the paraphyly of Daspletosaurus and participation of its species within a single anagenetic lineage terminating at the base of a clade formed by Tyrannosaurus and other gigantic tyrannosaurines (Tarbosaurus, Zhuchengtyrannus). However, a recent reanalysis including additional data has challenged this interpretation, instead recovering Daspletosaurus as a monophyletic sister group to Tyrannosaurus and its closest relatives, characterized by several cladogenetic events. Here we show that incorporating further data and correcting erroneous interpretations of relevant anatomical features overturns this result. Using a novel phylogenetic analysis including additional specimens, we recover a paraphyletic Daspletosaurus, with species of this genus forming successive sister taxa to Tyrannosaurus-line tyrannosaurines. This result facilitates an interpretation of currently recognized Daspletosaurus species as representing a single anagenetic lineage, in agreement with the stratigraphic distribution of relevant specimens and a qualitative analysis of the range of morphological variation observable within D. wilsoni.

暴龙的起源和血统:对 "数据集的再分析驳斥了暴龙系暴龙科(兽脚类,暴龙科)内的演替说法 "的回应
不同的学者曾假设霸王龙的分类多样性代表了多种进化模式。最近描述的D. wilsoni是该属的第三个物种,它被认为支持达斯普雷特龙的旁系性,并支持其物种参与到一个单一的起源系中,该起源系终止于由暴龙和其他巨型暴龙类(塔尔布龙、朱成滇龙)形成的支系的基部。然而,最近的一项重新分析(包括更多数据)对这一解释提出了质疑,而将覆盆子龙恢复为暴龙及其近亲的单系姊妹群,其特点是有几个支系发生事件。在这里,我们表明,纳入更多数据并纠正对相关解剖特征的错误解释将推翻这一结果。利用包括更多标本在内的新的系统发育分析,我们恢复了一个旁系的达斯普特龙,该属的物种连续成为暴龙系暴龙类的姊妹类群。这一结果有助于将目前公认的达斯普特龙物种解释为代表一个单一的世系,这与相关标本的地层分布以及对威尔逊龙(D. wilsoni)内部可观察到的形态变异范围的定性分析是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cretaceous Research
Cretaceous Research 地学-地质学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
19.00%
发文量
235
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cretaceous Research provides a forum for the rapid publication of research on all aspects of the Cretaceous Period, including its boundaries with the Jurassic and Palaeogene. Authoritative papers reporting detailed investigations of Cretaceous stratigraphy and palaeontology, studies of regional geology, and reviews of recently published books are complemented by short communications of significant new findings. Papers submitted to Cretaceous Research should place the research in a broad context, with emphasis placed towards our better understanding of the Cretaceous, that are therefore of interest to the diverse, international readership of the journal. Full length papers that focus solely on a local theme or area will not be accepted for publication; authors of short communications are encouraged to discuss how their findings are of relevance to the Cretaceous on a broad scale. Research Areas include: • Regional geology • Stratigraphy and palaeontology • Palaeobiology • Palaeobiogeography • Palaeoceanography • Palaeoclimatology • Evolutionary Palaeoecology • Geochronology • Global events.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信