Emergency Department Thoracotomy: A National Trauma Databank analysis

Taylor Glassman , Sathyaprasad Burjonrappa
{"title":"Emergency Department Thoracotomy: A National Trauma Databank analysis","authors":"Taylor Glassman ,&nbsp;Sathyaprasad Burjonrappa","doi":"10.1016/j.yjpso.2024.100154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Emergency Department Thoracotomy (EDT) warrants further investigation in the pediatric population due to concerns about its futility. Our study evaluates how patient demographics, injury characteristics, and physiologic status influence pediatric EDT outcomes in blunt and penetrating trauma.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective study analyzed patients ≤19 years who received EDT within 1 hour of arrival to the ED from the National Trauma Data Bank. Cases were stratified by blunt and penetrating trauma. Descriptive statistics and univariate analysis were used to identify predictors of survival post-EDT.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 1,075 pediatric patients who underwent Emergency Department Thoracotomy (EDT), 79.6 % experienced penetrating trauma and 20.4 % blunt trauma, with survival rates at 25.9 % and 9.1 %, respectively. Survivors of penetrating trauma typically presented with more stable vital signs, such as pulse rate, oximetry, and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores, and lower Injury Severity Scores (ISS), all correlating with survival (p &lt; 0.05). Survivors of blunt trauma were distinguished by higher respiratory rates and temperatures (p &lt; 0.05). Risk factor analysis indicated that age-adjusted bradycardia, age-adjusted hypotension, and pre-hospital cardiac arrest were significant predictors of mortality across trauma types (penetrating trauma: OR = 18.7, 6.2, and 20.7; blunt trauma: OR = 12, 2.69, and 6.4, all p &lt; 0.05). Notably, pre-hospital respiratory support was associated with a reduced risk of mortality for both types of trauma (OR = 0.32 for penetrating, and OR = 0.23 for blunt, p &lt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The study affirms the significance of pre-hospital care, showing that stable vitals and respiratory support enhance pediatric thoracotomy outcomes. Ongoing research into pediatric-specific trauma protocols are needed.</p></div><div><h3>Type of Study</h3><p>Retrospective cohort</p></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><p>III</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100821,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Surgery Open","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294971162400039X/pdfft?md5=e6da275be2ccb8802f406569f3485361&pid=1-s2.0-S294971162400039X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Surgery Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294971162400039X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Emergency Department Thoracotomy (EDT) warrants further investigation in the pediatric population due to concerns about its futility. Our study evaluates how patient demographics, injury characteristics, and physiologic status influence pediatric EDT outcomes in blunt and penetrating trauma.

Methods

This retrospective study analyzed patients ≤19 years who received EDT within 1 hour of arrival to the ED from the National Trauma Data Bank. Cases were stratified by blunt and penetrating trauma. Descriptive statistics and univariate analysis were used to identify predictors of survival post-EDT.

Results

Of the 1,075 pediatric patients who underwent Emergency Department Thoracotomy (EDT), 79.6 % experienced penetrating trauma and 20.4 % blunt trauma, with survival rates at 25.9 % and 9.1 %, respectively. Survivors of penetrating trauma typically presented with more stable vital signs, such as pulse rate, oximetry, and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores, and lower Injury Severity Scores (ISS), all correlating with survival (p < 0.05). Survivors of blunt trauma were distinguished by higher respiratory rates and temperatures (p < 0.05). Risk factor analysis indicated that age-adjusted bradycardia, age-adjusted hypotension, and pre-hospital cardiac arrest were significant predictors of mortality across trauma types (penetrating trauma: OR = 18.7, 6.2, and 20.7; blunt trauma: OR = 12, 2.69, and 6.4, all p < 0.05). Notably, pre-hospital respiratory support was associated with a reduced risk of mortality for both types of trauma (OR = 0.32 for penetrating, and OR = 0.23 for blunt, p < 0.05).

Conclusions

The study affirms the significance of pre-hospital care, showing that stable vitals and respiratory support enhance pediatric thoracotomy outcomes. Ongoing research into pediatric-specific trauma protocols are needed.

Type of Study

Retrospective cohort

Level of Evidence

III

急诊科胸廓切开术:国家创伤数据库分析
导言由于担心急诊科胸廓切开术(EDT)徒劳无益,因此有必要对儿科人群进行进一步研究。我们的研究评估了患者的人口统计学特征、损伤特征和生理状态如何影响钝性创伤和穿透性创伤的儿科 EDT 结果。根据钝性创伤和穿透性创伤对病例进行了分层。结果 在接受急诊科胸廓切开术(EDT)的1075名儿科患者中,79.6%经历过穿透性创伤,20.4%经历过钝性创伤,存活率分别为25.9%和9.1%。穿透性创伤幸存者的脉搏、血氧饱和度和格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分等生命体征通常更稳定,受伤严重程度评分(ISS)也更低,这些都与存活率相关(p < 0.05)。钝性创伤幸存者的特点是呼吸频率和体温较高(p < 0.05)。风险因素分析表明,年龄调整后的心动过缓、年龄调整后的低血压和院前心脏骤停是不同创伤类型死亡率的重要预测因素(穿透性创伤:OR=18.7、6.2 和 20.7;钝性创伤:OR=12、2.69 和 6.4,所有 p 均为 0.05)。值得注意的是,院前呼吸支持与两种类型创伤的死亡风险降低有关(穿透性创伤的 OR = 0.32,钝性创伤的 OR = 0.23,均为 p <0.05)。研究类型回顾性队列证据等级III
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信