Fast forward modeling of grounded electrical-source transient electromagnetic based on inverse Laplace transform adaptive hybrid algorithm

IF 4.2 2区 地球科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Xiran You , Jifeng Zhang , Jiao Luo
{"title":"Fast forward modeling of grounded electrical-source transient electromagnetic based on inverse Laplace transform adaptive hybrid algorithm","authors":"Xiran You ,&nbsp;Jifeng Zhang ,&nbsp;Jiao Luo","doi":"10.1016/j.cageo.2024.105661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Frequency–time conversion is a crucial step in grounded electrical-source transient electromagnetic response calculation, and the performance of the algorithm is directly related to the overall accuracy and speed of forward modeling. In mainstream algorithms, algorithms with high accuracy often have slow computation speed while algorithms with high efficiency have unsatisfactory accuracy, especially when facing inversion problems that are difficult to meet requirements. This paper introduces three inverse Laplace transform algorithms for this problem: the Gaver–Stehfest algorithm, the Euler algorithm, and the Talbot algorithm. The performance of each algorithm in forward modeling was analyzed using half-space and layered models, and the optimal selection schemes for algorithm weight coefficients were provided. The numerical calculation results show that the Gaver–Stehfest algorithm has a unique advantage in computational efficiency, while the Talbot algorithm and Euler algorithm meet the accuracy requirements. After considering both accuracy and efficiency, the Talbot algorithm is selected to replace conventional algorithms for calculation of grounded electrical-source transient electromagnetic forward modeling. In addition, this paper combines the characteristics of the Gaver–Stehfest algorithm and the Talbot algorithm to implement an adaptive hybrid algorithm. This algorithm uses the Gaver–Stehfest algorithm for forward modeling in the early times and the Talbot algorithm to compensate for the decrease in accuracy in the later times. Through the comparison of forward modeling calculations, it can be seen that the hybrid algorithm proposed in this paper fully utilizes the advantages of both algorithms. The hybrid algorithm greatly improves computational speed while meeting accuracy requirements, and has significant advantages over conventional algorithms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55221,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Geosciences","volume":"191 ","pages":"Article 105661"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0098300424001444","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Frequency–time conversion is a crucial step in grounded electrical-source transient electromagnetic response calculation, and the performance of the algorithm is directly related to the overall accuracy and speed of forward modeling. In mainstream algorithms, algorithms with high accuracy often have slow computation speed while algorithms with high efficiency have unsatisfactory accuracy, especially when facing inversion problems that are difficult to meet requirements. This paper introduces three inverse Laplace transform algorithms for this problem: the Gaver–Stehfest algorithm, the Euler algorithm, and the Talbot algorithm. The performance of each algorithm in forward modeling was analyzed using half-space and layered models, and the optimal selection schemes for algorithm weight coefficients were provided. The numerical calculation results show that the Gaver–Stehfest algorithm has a unique advantage in computational efficiency, while the Talbot algorithm and Euler algorithm meet the accuracy requirements. After considering both accuracy and efficiency, the Talbot algorithm is selected to replace conventional algorithms for calculation of grounded electrical-source transient electromagnetic forward modeling. In addition, this paper combines the characteristics of the Gaver–Stehfest algorithm and the Talbot algorithm to implement an adaptive hybrid algorithm. This algorithm uses the Gaver–Stehfest algorithm for forward modeling in the early times and the Talbot algorithm to compensate for the decrease in accuracy in the later times. Through the comparison of forward modeling calculations, it can be seen that the hybrid algorithm proposed in this paper fully utilizes the advantages of both algorithms. The hybrid algorithm greatly improves computational speed while meeting accuracy requirements, and has significant advantages over conventional algorithms.

基于反拉普拉斯变换自适应混合算法的接地电-源瞬变电磁快速正演模型
频时转换是接地电源瞬态电磁响应计算的关键步骤,算法的性能直接关系到正演建模的整体精度和速度。在主流算法中,精度高的算法往往运算速度慢,而效率高的算法精度却不尽如人意,尤其是在面对难以满足要求的反演问题时。本文介绍了针对该问题的三种反拉普拉斯变换算法:Gaver-Stehfest 算法、Euler 算法和 Talbot 算法。利用半空间模型和分层模型分析了每种算法在正向建模中的性能,并提供了算法权系数的最优选择方案。数值计算结果表明,Gaver-Stehfest 算法在计算效率方面具有独特优势,而 Talbot 算法和 Euler 算法则能满足精度要求。综合考虑精度和效率,本文选择 Talbot 算法取代传统算法,用于接地电源瞬态电磁正演建模计算。此外,本文结合 Gaver-Stehfest 算法和 Talbot 算法的特点,实现了一种自适应混合算法。该算法在早期使用 Gaver-Stehfest 算法进行前向建模,在后期使用 Talbot 算法弥补精度的下降。通过前向建模计算的比较,可以看出本文提出的混合算法充分发挥了两种算法的优势。在满足精度要求的同时,混合算法大大提高了计算速度,与传统算法相比优势明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computers & Geosciences
Computers & Geosciences 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
6.80%
发文量
164
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: Computers & Geosciences publishes high impact, original research at the interface between Computer Sciences and Geosciences. Publications should apply modern computer science paradigms, whether computational or informatics-based, to address problems in the geosciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信