Online deviance in post-Soviet space: Victimisation, perceptions and social attitudes amongst young people, an Armenian case study

Tim Hall , Ulrike Ziemer
{"title":"Online deviance in post-Soviet space: Victimisation, perceptions and social attitudes amongst young people, an Armenian case study","authors":"Tim Hall ,&nbsp;Ulrike Ziemer","doi":"10.1016/j.diggeo.2024.100096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper presents a survey-based case study of the experiences and perceptions of, and attitudes towards, various forms of online deviance amongst a largely female, educated sample of young people drawn predominantly from the Armenian capital city of Yerevan. It found high levels of reported victimisation and encounters with online deviance, including from multiple forms of online deviance. Online information that is deliberately misleading, biased or fabricated and information that is abusive or threatening, or that expresses a prejudice against a particular group were the two most widely reported categories of victimisation and encounter. The paper also explores the claim that forms of online deviance enjoy some degree of social legitimacy within post-Soviet space. Our case study found that online deviance enjoys very little social legitimacy amongst survey respondents. The case study explores the ways in which the experiences and perceptions of, and attitudes towards, various forms of online deviance vary across different forms of online deviance in a way that no studies have done previously. It also offers a rare empirical engagement with questions of online deviance within the post-Soviet space and the very first addressing online deviance in Armenia. This paper adds to our limited knowledge of the internal geographies of online deviance within post-Soviet space. The findings presented here begin to challenge the perception of post-Soviet countries, or countries in the post-Soviet space, as constituting a universal cyber-threat landscape and suggest that future research should probe the internal geographies of online deviance (and victimisation) across the region. It also highlights gender as a perspective from which future research might scrutinize online deviance. It further suggests nuanced policy stances more reflective of the empirical realities of different forms of online deviance across post-Soviet space.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100377,"journal":{"name":"Digital Geography and Society","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100096"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666378324000187/pdfft?md5=c88c66225c04fd1d92c226adaf4730c7&pid=1-s2.0-S2666378324000187-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Geography and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666378324000187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents a survey-based case study of the experiences and perceptions of, and attitudes towards, various forms of online deviance amongst a largely female, educated sample of young people drawn predominantly from the Armenian capital city of Yerevan. It found high levels of reported victimisation and encounters with online deviance, including from multiple forms of online deviance. Online information that is deliberately misleading, biased or fabricated and information that is abusive or threatening, or that expresses a prejudice against a particular group were the two most widely reported categories of victimisation and encounter. The paper also explores the claim that forms of online deviance enjoy some degree of social legitimacy within post-Soviet space. Our case study found that online deviance enjoys very little social legitimacy amongst survey respondents. The case study explores the ways in which the experiences and perceptions of, and attitudes towards, various forms of online deviance vary across different forms of online deviance in a way that no studies have done previously. It also offers a rare empirical engagement with questions of online deviance within the post-Soviet space and the very first addressing online deviance in Armenia. This paper adds to our limited knowledge of the internal geographies of online deviance within post-Soviet space. The findings presented here begin to challenge the perception of post-Soviet countries, or countries in the post-Soviet space, as constituting a universal cyber-threat landscape and suggest that future research should probe the internal geographies of online deviance (and victimisation) across the region. It also highlights gender as a perspective from which future research might scrutinize online deviance. It further suggests nuanced policy stances more reflective of the empirical realities of different forms of online deviance across post-Soviet space.

后苏联地区的网上异常行为:年轻人的受害情况、看法和社会态度,亚美尼亚案例研究
本文介绍了一项基于调查的案例研究,研究对象主要是来自亚美尼亚首都埃里温的受过教育的年轻人,其中大部分为女性,他们对各种形式的网络异常行为的经历、看法和态度。调查发现,报告的受害情况和遭遇网上异常行为(包括多种形式的网上异常行为)的比例很高。蓄意误导、带有偏见或捏造的网上信息,以及辱骂或威胁性的信息,或对某一特定群体表达偏见的信息,是受害和遭遇报告最多的两类信息。本文还探讨了一种说法,即在苏联解体后的空间内,网络异常形式享有某种程度的社会合法性。我们的案例研究发现,在调查对象中,网上异常行为几乎不具有社会合法性。本案例研究探讨了不同形式的网上违规行为在经历、认知和态度上的差异,这是以往任何研究都未曾做过的。它还对后苏联地区的网上违规问题进行了罕见的实证研究,也是首次对亚美尼亚的网上违规问题进行研究。本文丰富了我们对后苏联地区网上违规行为的内部地域的有限了解。本文的研究结果开始质疑后苏联国家或后苏联地区国家构成普遍网络威胁景观的看法,并建议未来的研究应探究整个地区网络违规(和受害)的内部地域。报告还强调了性别问题,认为未来的研究可以从这一角度来审视网上违规行为。报告还建议采取细致入微的政策立场,以更好地反映后苏联地区不同形式的网络违规行为的实际情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信