Brief behavioral intervention for chronic pain in integrated primary care: What are we waiting for?

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES
Gregory P Beehler, Michael Verile, Mandy Conrad, Dezarie Moskal
{"title":"Brief behavioral intervention for chronic pain in integrated primary care: What are we waiting for?","authors":"Gregory P Beehler, Michael Verile, Mandy Conrad, Dezarie Moskal","doi":"10.1037/fsh0000899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite high rates of pain-related concerns among primary care patients and associated increases in health care costs (Gore et al., 2012; Mills et al., 2016), psychological or behavioral treatments that are well suited for use in integrated primary care (IPC) settings remain sparsely implemented. Psychological treatment for chronic pain has been recommended for many years (Darnall, 2021; Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Advancing Pain Research, Care and Education, 2011; Kligler et al., 2018), and the emphasis on the application of nonpharmacological treatment has intensified following concerns about opioid safety. There is abundant empirical support for the use of psychological treatment for chronic pain, such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in specialty settings (Williams et al., 2021). The evidence to support the use of \"brief treatments\" in IPC is in a comparatively early stage. The limited state of the research might suggest that brief behavioral intervention for chronic pain is years away from being ready for translation to everyday clinical practice. But why wait? We therefore conducted a focused narrative review of peer-reviewed research on brief psychotherapy for chronic pain in adults that could be feasibly employed in IPC settings through more widely adopted models, such as primary care behavioral health. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55612,"journal":{"name":"Families Systems & Health","volume":"42 2","pages":"151-156"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Families Systems & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000899","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite high rates of pain-related concerns among primary care patients and associated increases in health care costs (Gore et al., 2012; Mills et al., 2016), psychological or behavioral treatments that are well suited for use in integrated primary care (IPC) settings remain sparsely implemented. Psychological treatment for chronic pain has been recommended for many years (Darnall, 2021; Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Advancing Pain Research, Care and Education, 2011; Kligler et al., 2018), and the emphasis on the application of nonpharmacological treatment has intensified following concerns about opioid safety. There is abundant empirical support for the use of psychological treatment for chronic pain, such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in specialty settings (Williams et al., 2021). The evidence to support the use of "brief treatments" in IPC is in a comparatively early stage. The limited state of the research might suggest that brief behavioral intervention for chronic pain is years away from being ready for translation to everyday clinical practice. But why wait? We therefore conducted a focused narrative review of peer-reviewed research on brief psychotherapy for chronic pain in adults that could be feasibly employed in IPC settings through more widely adopted models, such as primary care behavioral health. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

在综合初级保健中对慢性疼痛进行简短行为干预:我们还在等什么?
尽管初级保健患者中疼痛相关问题的发生率很高,而且相关的医疗费用也在增加(Gore 等人,2012 年;Mills 等人,2016 年),但非常适合在综合初级保健(IPC)环境中使用的心理或行为治疗方法仍然很少实施。多年来,人们一直建议对慢性疼痛进行心理治疗(Darnall,2021 年;美国医学研究所疼痛研究、护理和教育推进委员会,2011 年;Kligler 等人,2018 年),在对阿片类药物安全性的担忧之后,人们更加重视非药物治疗的应用。在专科环境中使用认知行为疗法(CBT)等心理治疗慢性疼痛有大量的经验支持(Williams 等人,2021 年)。支持在 IPC 中使用 "简短治疗 "的证据还处于相对早期阶段。研究的有限性可能表明,针对慢性疼痛的简短行为干预还需要数年时间才能转化为日常临床实践。但为什么还要等待呢?因此,我们对经同行评审的有关成人慢性疼痛简短心理治疗的研究进行了重点叙述性综述,这些研究可以通过更广泛采用的模式(如初级保健行为健康)在 IPC 环境中可行地应用。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Families Systems & Health
Families Systems & Health HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
81
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Families, Systems, & Health publishes clinical research, training, and theoretical contributions in the areas of families and health, with particular focus on collaborative family healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信