Healthcare Professionals and Extreme Risk Protection Orders: A Concise Review.

IF 0.7 4区医学 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE

Journal of Trauma Nursing Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-04 DOI:10.1097/JTN.0000000000000802

Lisa C Lindley, Lora Humphrey Beebe, Heather A Davis, Christina N Policastro, Radion Svynarenko

{"title":"Healthcare Professionals and Extreme Risk Protection Orders: A Concise Review.","authors":"Lisa C Lindley, Lora Humphrey Beebe, Heather A Davis, Christina N Policastro, Radion Svynarenko","doi":"10.1097/JTN.0000000000000802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Extreme risk protection orders (ERPOs) are one policy mechanism to address the critical public health problem of gun violence. The inclusion of healthcare professionals with ERPOs is a promising approach to expanding ERPO utilization, yet early evidence has not been examined.Objective: The purpose of this study was to synthesize the current research on healthcare professionals and ERPOs.Data sources: Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PubMed, Academic Search Complete, and Web of Science were searched.Study selection: Studies examined healthcare professionals' role and function within the context of ERPOs.Data extraction: Relevant studies were reviewed and included through consensus of the authors. Data extracted included authors, objective, design, states, healthcare professional type, mental health professional type, healthcare professional roles/involvement and key outcomes.Data synthesis: There is unfamiliarity with ERPOs among healthcare professionals. Healthcare professionals lack ERPO knowledge and are unclear about ethical and legal ERPO liability.Conclusion: The available evidence suggests that healthcare professionals have an important role in ERPOs, but critical gaps in ERPO knowledge, training/resources, and liability will limit use and effectiveness of healthcare professionals, including nurses, in the role of ERPO petitioner.","PeriodicalId":51329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trauma Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JTN.0000000000000802","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Extreme risk protection orders (ERPOs) are one policy mechanism to address the critical public health problem of gun violence. The inclusion of healthcare professionals with ERPOs is a promising approach to expanding ERPO utilization, yet early evidence has not been examined.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to synthesize the current research on healthcare professionals and ERPOs.

Data sources: Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PubMed, Academic Search Complete, and Web of Science were searched.

Study selection: Studies examined healthcare professionals' role and function within the context of ERPOs.

Data extraction: Relevant studies were reviewed and included through consensus of the authors. Data extracted included authors, objective, design, states, healthcare professional type, mental health professional type, healthcare professional roles/involvement and key outcomes.

Data synthesis: There is unfamiliarity with ERPOs among healthcare professionals. Healthcare professionals lack ERPO knowledge and are unclear about ethical and legal ERPO liability.

Conclusion: The available evidence suggests that healthcare professionals have an important role in ERPOs, but critical gaps in ERPO knowledge, training/resources, and liability will limit use and effectiveness of healthcare professionals, including nurses, in the role of ERPO petitioner.

查看原文本刊更多论文

医疗保健专业人员和极端风险保护令：简明评论。

背景：极度危险保护令（ERPO）是解决枪支暴力这一严重公共卫生问题的政策机制之一。将医疗保健专业人员纳入ERPO是扩大ERPO使用范围的一个很有前景的方法，但尚未对早期证据进行研究：本研究的目的是综合目前有关医护专业人员和 ERPOs 的研究：数据来源：检索了《护理和专职医疗文献累积索引》（CINAHL）、PubMed、Academic Search Complete 和 Web of Science：数据提取：数据提取：对相关研究进行审查，并经作者协商一致后纳入。提取的数据包括作者、目的、设计、状态、医疗保健专业人员类型、精神健康专业人员类型、医疗保健专业人员的角色/参与以及主要结果：医护人员对ERPO并不熟悉。医护人员缺乏ERPO知识，对ERPO的伦理和法律责任也不清楚：现有证据表明，医护专业人员在ERPO中扮演着重要角色，但在ERPO知识、培训/资源和责任方面的关键差距将限制包括护士在内的医护专业人员在ERPO申请人角色中的使用和有效性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Trauma Nursing CRITICAL CARE MEDICINENURSING&-NURSING

CiteScore

1.20

自引率

10.00%

发文量

106

期刊介绍： Journal of Trauma Nursing (JTN) is the official journal of the Society of Trauma Nurses. The Society of Trauma Nurses believes that trauma is a disease impacting patients through the continuum of care. The mission of STN is to ensure optimal trauma care through education, collaboration, leadership and membership engagement. As the official publication of the Society of Trauma Nurses, the Journal of Trauma Nursing supports the STN’s strategic goals of effective communication, education and patient advocacy with original, peer-reviewed, research and evidence-based articles and information that reflect the highest standard of collaborative care for trauma patients. The Journal of Trauma Nursing, through a commitment to editorial excellence, implements STN’s vision to improve practice and patient outcomes and to become the premiere global nursing organization across the trauma continuum.