Evaluating Child Passenger Restraint Use Education.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Journal of Trauma Nursing Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-04 DOI:10.1097/JTN.0000000000000798
Jeanne Marsala, Todd Hightower, Sheri Stucke, Brittany Trujillo, Cheryl Malone, Jennifer Bertolani, Justin Jacobs, David Silverberg, Nancy Rivera, Nicholas Fiore
{"title":"Evaluating Child Passenger Restraint Use Education.","authors":"Jeanne Marsala, Todd Hightower, Sheri Stucke, Brittany Trujillo, Cheryl Malone, Jennifer Bertolani, Justin Jacobs, David Silverberg, Nancy Rivera, Nicholas Fiore","doi":"10.1097/JTN.0000000000000798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite recommendations and laws for child restraint use in motor vehicles, evidence of low restraint use remains, and there is a lack of evidence addressing the effectiveness of restraint use education.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This project aims to measure the impact of an education initiative on child passenger restraint use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This pre- and postintervention study was conducted in six elementary schools in a Southwestern U.S. metropolitan area over 5 months from October 2022 to March 2023. Motor vehicle restraint use was collected from occupants arriving at elementary schools during the morning drop-off times. Participants were provided one-on-one education regarding child passenger safety guidelines and state laws. Comparison data were collected 1-3 weeks later at the same schools to evaluate the education provided.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,671 occupants in 612 vehicles were observed across six schools, with 343 adults and 553 children preintervention and 306 adults and 469 children postintervention. Overall restraint adherence in children improved postintervention from 42.3% to 56.1%, a 32.6% increase (p = < .001). In the primary age group of 4-8 years, restraint adherence improved postintervention from 34.8% to 54.2%, a 55.8% increase (p = <.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study results demonstrate that one-on-one education increases child passenger restraint use.</p>","PeriodicalId":51329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trauma Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JTN.0000000000000798","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite recommendations and laws for child restraint use in motor vehicles, evidence of low restraint use remains, and there is a lack of evidence addressing the effectiveness of restraint use education.

Objective: This project aims to measure the impact of an education initiative on child passenger restraint use.

Methods: This pre- and postintervention study was conducted in six elementary schools in a Southwestern U.S. metropolitan area over 5 months from October 2022 to March 2023. Motor vehicle restraint use was collected from occupants arriving at elementary schools during the morning drop-off times. Participants were provided one-on-one education regarding child passenger safety guidelines and state laws. Comparison data were collected 1-3 weeks later at the same schools to evaluate the education provided.

Results: A total of 1,671 occupants in 612 vehicles were observed across six schools, with 343 adults and 553 children preintervention and 306 adults and 469 children postintervention. Overall restraint adherence in children improved postintervention from 42.3% to 56.1%, a 32.6% increase (p = < .001). In the primary age group of 4-8 years, restraint adherence improved postintervention from 34.8% to 54.2%, a 55.8% increase (p = <.001).

Conclusions: The study results demonstrate that one-on-one education increases child passenger restraint use.

评估儿童乘客约束装置使用教育。
背景:尽管有关于在机动车辆中使用儿童约束装置的建议和法律,但仍有证据表明约束装置的使用率很低,而且缺乏关于约束装置使用教育有效性的证据:本项目旨在衡量一项教育措施对儿童乘客使用约束装置的影响:从 2022 年 10 月到 2023 年 3 月,在美国西南部大都会地区的六所小学进行了为期 5 个月的干预前和干预后研究。研究人员收集了上午放学时段到达小学的乘员使用机动车约束装置的情况。参与者接受了有关儿童乘车安全指南和州法律的一对一教育。1-3 周后在同一所学校收集对比数据,以评估所提供的教育:六所学校共观察了 612 辆车中的 1671 名乘客,其中干预前有 343 名成人和 553 名儿童,干预后有 306 名成人和 469 名儿童。干预后,儿童遵守约束措施的总体比例从 42.3% 提高到 56.1%,提高了 32.6%(p = 结论):研究结果表明,一对一教育提高了儿童乘客约束装置的使用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Trauma Nursing
Journal of Trauma Nursing CRITICAL CARE MEDICINENURSING&-NURSING
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: ​Journal of Trauma Nursing (JTN) is the official journal of the Society of Trauma Nurses. The Society of Trauma Nurses believes that trauma is a disease impacting patients through the continuum of care. The mission of STN is to ensure optimal trauma care through education, collaboration, leadership and membership engagement. As the official publication of the Society of Trauma Nurses, the Journal of Trauma Nursing supports the STN’s strategic goals of effective communication, education and patient advocacy with original, peer-reviewed, research and evidence-based articles and information that reflect the highest standard of collaborative care for trauma patients.​ The Journal of Trauma Nursing, through a commitment to editorial excellence, implements STN’s vision to improve practice and patient outcomes and to become the premiere global nursing organization across the trauma continuum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信