Review of the Australian nurse teacher professional practice standards: An e-Delphi study

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Christine Taylor , Creina Mitchell , Hellen Kaneko , Belinda Foley , Julie Shaw
{"title":"Review of the Australian nurse teacher professional practice standards: An e-Delphi study","authors":"Christine Taylor ,&nbsp;Creina Mitchell ,&nbsp;Hellen Kaneko ,&nbsp;Belinda Foley ,&nbsp;Julie Shaw","doi":"10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>The aim of the study was to review the 2010 Australian nurse teacher professional practice standards (‘the Standards’) to see if they were still relevant to current nursing educator practice in any practice setting, such as academia or clinical settings.</p></div><div><h3>Background</h3><p>It has been over 10 years since ‘the Standards have been reviewed. Nurse education practice has met many challenges in the past decade, so it is timely to evaluate whether the Standards are still relevant to nursing educators today.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A modified Delphi technique was used for this study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Delphi surveys were used to obtain consensus on the relevance of the Standards’ statements to any nursing educator. Links to two electronic surveys were sent to an expert panel of nursing educator leaders. Also, two online focus groups of nursing educators from any practice setting or level of experience were held. Results from the first survey and focus groups led to word changes and additional statements, which were included in the second Delphi survey.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Forty participants responded to the first survey and 38 to the second. Fifteen nursing educators attended the focus groups. There was ≥85 % agreement on all statements in the first survey. with similar high agreement responses in the second survey. Changes in the Standards included language used around culture, inclusion of ‘sustainability of the program’ and ‘demonstrates knowledge and expertise in teaching and educational practice’.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The Australian nurse teacher professional practice standards remain highly relevant to nursing educators across all practice settings. In response to feedback from nursing educators some changes to language and additional standard statements were included in the revised standards.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48715,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education in Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471595324001744/pdfft?md5=bc1f0f1be7494424da5b47f5c331efd3&pid=1-s2.0-S1471595324001744-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471595324001744","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

The aim of the study was to review the 2010 Australian nurse teacher professional practice standards (‘the Standards’) to see if they were still relevant to current nursing educator practice in any practice setting, such as academia or clinical settings.

Background

It has been over 10 years since ‘the Standards have been reviewed. Nurse education practice has met many challenges in the past decade, so it is timely to evaluate whether the Standards are still relevant to nursing educators today.

Design

A modified Delphi technique was used for this study.

Methods

Delphi surveys were used to obtain consensus on the relevance of the Standards’ statements to any nursing educator. Links to two electronic surveys were sent to an expert panel of nursing educator leaders. Also, two online focus groups of nursing educators from any practice setting or level of experience were held. Results from the first survey and focus groups led to word changes and additional statements, which were included in the second Delphi survey.

Results

Forty participants responded to the first survey and 38 to the second. Fifteen nursing educators attended the focus groups. There was ≥85 % agreement on all statements in the first survey. with similar high agreement responses in the second survey. Changes in the Standards included language used around culture, inclusion of ‘sustainability of the program’ and ‘demonstrates knowledge and expertise in teaching and educational practice’.

Conclusions

The Australian nurse teacher professional practice standards remain highly relevant to nursing educators across all practice settings. In response to feedback from nursing educators some changes to language and additional standard statements were included in the revised standards.

澳大利亚护士教师职业实践标准审查:电子德尔菲研究。
目的:本研究旨在回顾 2010 年澳大利亚护理教师职业实践标准("标准"),以了解这些标准是否仍与当前护理教育工作者在任何实践环境(如学术界或临床环境)中的实践相关:背景:自 "标准 "修订以来,已经过去了 10 多年。背景:"标准 "已经有 10 多年没有进行过审查了。在过去的 10 年中,护理教育实践遇到了许多挑战,因此,现在是评估 "标准 "是否仍然适用于当今护理教育者的时候了:本研究采用改良的德尔菲技术:德尔菲调查用于就《标准》的声明对任何护理教育者的相关性达成共识。向护理教育者领导专家小组发送了两个电子调查的链接。此外,还举行了两次在线焦点小组讨论,参与者包括来自任何实践环境或经验水平的护理教育者。第一次调查和焦点小组讨论的结果导致了用词的改变和额外的陈述,这些都被纳入了第二次德尔菲调查:40 名参与者对第一次调查做出了回应,38 名参与者对第二次调查做出了回应。15 名护理教育工作者参加了焦点小组。在第一次调查中,所有陈述的一致率≥85%,第二次调查中的一致率也很高。标准中的变化包括围绕文化使用的语言、纳入 "项目的可持续性 "以及 "展示教学和教育实践方面的知识和专长":澳大利亚护理教师职业实践标准对所有实践环境中的护理教育者都具有高度相关性。根据护理教育者的反馈意见,修订后的标准对语言进行了一些修改,并增加了一些标准说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
9.40%
发文量
180
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education in Practice enables lecturers and practitioners to both share and disseminate evidence that demonstrates the actual practice of education as it is experienced in the realities of their respective work environments. It is supportive of new authors and will be at the forefront in publishing individual and collaborative papers that demonstrate the link between education and practice.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信