Joint Brain Tumor Segmentation from Multi-magnetic Resonance Sequences through a Deep Convolutional Neural Network.

IF 1.1 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Journal of Medical Signals & Sensors Pub Date : 2024-04-08 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jmss.jmss_13_23
Farzaneh Dehghani, Alireza Karimian, Hossein Arabi
{"title":"Joint Brain Tumor Segmentation from Multi-magnetic Resonance Sequences through a Deep Convolutional Neural Network.","authors":"Farzaneh Dehghani, Alireza Karimian, Hossein Arabi","doi":"10.4103/jmss.jmss_13_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Brain tumor segmentation is highly contributive in diagnosing and treatment planning. Manual brain tumor delineation is a time-consuming and tedious task and varies depending on the radiologist's skill. Automated brain tumor segmentation is of high importance and does not depend on either inter- or intra-observation. The objective of this study is to automate the delineation of brain tumors from the Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), T1-weighted (T1W), T2-weighted (T2W), and T1W contrast-enhanced (T1ce) magnetic resonance (MR) sequences through a deep learning approach, with a focus on determining which MR sequence alone or which combination thereof would lead to the highest accuracy therein.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The BraTS-2020 challenge dataset, containing 370 subjects with four MR sequences and manually delineated tumor masks, is applied to train a residual neural network. This network is trained and assessed separately for each one of the MR sequences (single-channel input) and any combination thereof (dual- or multi-channel input).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The quantitative assessment of the single-channel models reveals that the FLAIR sequence would yield higher segmentation accuracy compared to its counterparts with a 0.77 ± 0.10 Dice index. As to considering the dual-channel models, the model with FLAIR and T2W inputs yields a 0.80 ± 0.10 Dice index, exhibiting higher performance. The joint tumor segmentation on the entire four MR sequences yields the highest overall segmentation accuracy with a 0.82 ± 0.09 Dice index.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The FLAIR MR sequence is considered the best choice for tumor segmentation on a single MR sequence, while the joint segmentation on the entire four MR sequences would yield higher tumor delineation accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":37680,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Signals & Sensors","volume":"14 ","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11111160/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Signals & Sensors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmss.jmss_13_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Brain tumor segmentation is highly contributive in diagnosing and treatment planning. Manual brain tumor delineation is a time-consuming and tedious task and varies depending on the radiologist's skill. Automated brain tumor segmentation is of high importance and does not depend on either inter- or intra-observation. The objective of this study is to automate the delineation of brain tumors from the Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), T1-weighted (T1W), T2-weighted (T2W), and T1W contrast-enhanced (T1ce) magnetic resonance (MR) sequences through a deep learning approach, with a focus on determining which MR sequence alone or which combination thereof would lead to the highest accuracy therein.

Methods: The BraTS-2020 challenge dataset, containing 370 subjects with four MR sequences and manually delineated tumor masks, is applied to train a residual neural network. This network is trained and assessed separately for each one of the MR sequences (single-channel input) and any combination thereof (dual- or multi-channel input).

Results: The quantitative assessment of the single-channel models reveals that the FLAIR sequence would yield higher segmentation accuracy compared to its counterparts with a 0.77 ± 0.10 Dice index. As to considering the dual-channel models, the model with FLAIR and T2W inputs yields a 0.80 ± 0.10 Dice index, exhibiting higher performance. The joint tumor segmentation on the entire four MR sequences yields the highest overall segmentation accuracy with a 0.82 ± 0.09 Dice index.

Conclusion: The FLAIR MR sequence is considered the best choice for tumor segmentation on a single MR sequence, while the joint segmentation on the entire four MR sequences would yield higher tumor delineation accuracy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

通过深度卷积神经网络从多磁共振序列中联合分割脑肿瘤
背景:脑肿瘤分割对诊断和治疗计划有很大帮助。人工脑肿瘤分界是一项耗时而乏味的工作,而且取决于放射医师的技术水平。自动脑肿瘤分割非常重要,而且不依赖于内部或外部观察。本研究的目的是通过深度学习方法,自动从流体增强反转恢复(FLAIR)、T1 加权(T1W)、T2 加权(T2W)和 T1W 对比增强(T1ce)磁共振(MR)序列中划分脑肿瘤,重点是确定哪种磁共振序列单独使用或组合使用的准确率最高:BraTS-2020 挑战赛数据集包含 370 名受试者、四种 MR 序列和人工划定的肿瘤掩膜,该数据集被用于训练一个残差神经网络。该网络针对每种磁共振序列(单通道输入)及其任意组合(双通道或多通道输入)分别进行训练和评估:结果:对单通道模型的定量评估显示,FLAIR 序列的 Dice 指数为 0.77 ± 0.10,与同类序列相比,FLAIR 序列的分割准确率更高。至于双通道模型,FLAIR 和 T2W 输入模型的 Dice 指数为 0.80 ± 0.10,表现出更高的性能。对全部四个 MR 序列进行联合肿瘤分割的总体分割准确率最高,Dice 指数为 0.82 ± 0.09:结论:在单个磁共振序列上进行肿瘤分割时,FLAIR 磁共振序列是最佳选择,而在整个四个磁共振序列上进行联合分割则可获得更高的肿瘤划分准确率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Signals & Sensors
Journal of Medical Signals & Sensors ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
审稿时长
33 weeks
期刊介绍: JMSS is an interdisciplinary journal that incorporates all aspects of the biomedical engineering including bioelectrics, bioinformatics, medical physics, health technology assessment, etc. Subject areas covered by the journal include: - Bioelectric: Bioinstruments Biosensors Modeling Biomedical signal processing Medical image analysis and processing Medical imaging devices Control of biological systems Neuromuscular systems Cognitive sciences Telemedicine Robotic Medical ultrasonography Bioelectromagnetics Electrophysiology Cell tracking - Bioinformatics and medical informatics: Analysis of biological data Data mining Stochastic modeling Computational genomics Artificial intelligence & fuzzy Applications Medical softwares Bioalgorithms Electronic health - Biophysics and medical physics: Computed tomography Radiation therapy Laser therapy - Education in biomedical engineering - Health technology assessment - Standard in biomedical engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信