Retrospective Outcomes Comparison by Treatment Location for Pediatric Mild and Moderate Diabetic Ketoacidosis.

Q1 Nursing
David Baker, Helene Glickman, Allyson Tank, Courtney Caminiti, Anna Melnick, Ilir Agalliu, Lisa Underland, Daniel M Fein, Mark Shlomovich, Jacqueline Weingarten-Arams, Henry M Ushay, Chhavi Katyal, Sara H Soshnick
{"title":"Retrospective Outcomes Comparison by Treatment Location for Pediatric Mild and Moderate Diabetic Ketoacidosis.","authors":"David Baker, Helene Glickman, Allyson Tank, Courtney Caminiti, Anna Melnick, Ilir Agalliu, Lisa Underland, Daniel M Fein, Mark Shlomovich, Jacqueline Weingarten-Arams, Henry M Ushay, Chhavi Katyal, Sara H Soshnick","doi":"10.1542/hpeds.2023-007576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Pediatric diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is often treated in a PICU, but nonsevere DKA may not necessitate PICU admission. At our institution, nonsevere DKA was treated on the floor until policy change shifted care to the PICU. We describe outcomes in pediatric mild to moderate DKA by treatment location.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients aged 2 to 21 with mild to moderate DKA (pH <7.3 but >7.1), treated on the floor from January 1, 2018 to July 31, 2020 and PICU from August 1, 2020 to October 1, 2022 were included. We performed a single-center, retrospective cohort study; primary outcome was DKA duration (from emergency department diagnosis to resolution), secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay, and complication rates, based on treatment location.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy nine floor and 65 PICU encounters for mild to moderate pediatric DKA were analyzed. There were no differences in demographics, initial pH, or bicarbonate; PICU patients had more acute kidney injury on admission. Floor patients had a shorter DKA duration (10 hours [interquartile range 7-13] vs 11 hours [9-15]; P = .04), and a shorter median length of stay (median 43.5 hours [interquartile range 31-62] vs 49 hours [32-100]; P < .01). No patients had clinical signs of cerebral edema; other complications occurred at similar rates. PICU patients received significantly more intravenous electrolyte boluses, but there were no differences in dysrhythmia or electrolyte abnormalities on final serum chemistry.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study did not find a clear benefit to admitting patients with mild to moderate DKA to the PICU instead of the hospital floor. Our findings suggest that some children with nonsevere DKA may be treated safely in a non-PICU setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":38180,"journal":{"name":"Hospital pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"e349-e354"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2023-007576","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Pediatric diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is often treated in a PICU, but nonsevere DKA may not necessitate PICU admission. At our institution, nonsevere DKA was treated on the floor until policy change shifted care to the PICU. We describe outcomes in pediatric mild to moderate DKA by treatment location.

Methods: Patients aged 2 to 21 with mild to moderate DKA (pH <7.3 but >7.1), treated on the floor from January 1, 2018 to July 31, 2020 and PICU from August 1, 2020 to October 1, 2022 were included. We performed a single-center, retrospective cohort study; primary outcome was DKA duration (from emergency department diagnosis to resolution), secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay, and complication rates, based on treatment location.

Results: Seventy nine floor and 65 PICU encounters for mild to moderate pediatric DKA were analyzed. There were no differences in demographics, initial pH, or bicarbonate; PICU patients had more acute kidney injury on admission. Floor patients had a shorter DKA duration (10 hours [interquartile range 7-13] vs 11 hours [9-15]; P = .04), and a shorter median length of stay (median 43.5 hours [interquartile range 31-62] vs 49 hours [32-100]; P < .01). No patients had clinical signs of cerebral edema; other complications occurred at similar rates. PICU patients received significantly more intravenous electrolyte boluses, but there were no differences in dysrhythmia or electrolyte abnormalities on final serum chemistry.

Conclusions: Our study did not find a clear benefit to admitting patients with mild to moderate DKA to the PICU instead of the hospital floor. Our findings suggest that some children with nonsevere DKA may be treated safely in a non-PICU setting.

小儿轻度和中度糖尿病酮症酸中毒治疗地点的回顾性结果比较。
目的:小儿糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)通常在重症监护病房(PICU)接受治疗,但非重症 DKA 可能无需入住重症监护病房。在我们医院,非重度 DKA 在楼层接受治疗,直到政策改变将治疗转移到 PICU。我们按治疗地点描述了小儿轻度至中度 DKA 的治疗结果:方法:纳入2018年1月1日至2020年7月31日在楼层接受治疗的2至21岁轻中度DKA(pH值为7.1)患者,以及2020年8月1日至2022年10月1日在PICU接受治疗的患者。我们进行了一项单中心、回顾性队列研究;主要结果是 DKA 持续时间(从急诊科诊断到缓解),次要结果包括住院时间和并发症发生率(基于治疗地点):研究分析了79例楼道和65例PICU轻中度儿科DKA就诊病例。在人口统计学、初始 pH 值或碳酸氢盐方面没有差异;PICU 患者入院时急性肾损伤更严重。楼层患者的 DKA 持续时间较短(10 小时 [四分位间范围 7-13] vs 11 小时 [9-15];P = .04),中位住院时间较短(中位 43.5 小时 [四分位间范围 31-62] vs 49 小时 [32-100];P < .01)。没有患者出现脑水肿的临床症状;其他并发症的发生率相似。PICU患者接受静脉注射电解质的次数明显增多,但最终血清化学检查中的心律失常或电解质异常没有差异:我们的研究并未发现将轻度至中度 DKA 患者送入 PICU 而非住院部有明显的益处。我们的研究结果表明,一些非重度 DKA 患儿可以在非 PICU 环境中得到安全治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hospital pediatrics
Hospital pediatrics Nursing-Pediatrics
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
204
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信