Validation of the German version of the Asthma Impairment and Risk Questionnaire (AIRQ).

IF 1.2 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Pneumologie Pub Date : 2024-07-11 DOI:10.1055/a-2346-9840
Frank Kanniess, Kerstin Defosse, Marek Lommatzsch, Thomas Schultz, Hartmut Timmermann, Olaf Schmidt, Stefan Heindl, Hans Jörg Baumann, Roland Buhl, Christian Taube, Fabian Höing, Stephanie Korn
{"title":"Validation of the German version of the Asthma Impairment and Risk Questionnaire (AIRQ).","authors":"Frank Kanniess, Kerstin Defosse, Marek Lommatzsch, Thomas Schultz, Hartmut Timmermann, Olaf Schmidt, Stefan Heindl, Hans Jörg Baumann, Roland Buhl, Christian Taube, Fabian Höing, Stephanie Korn","doi":"10.1055/a-2346-9840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Asthma Impairment and Risk Questionnaire (AIRQ), a 10-item, equally weighted, yes/no tool assessing symptom impairment and risk of exacerbations in patients with asthma aged ≥12 years, was developed and validated in a US patient population to evaluate varying levels of asthma control. This study aimed to validate the German language version of the AIRQ in patients aged ≥12 years with different levels of asthma control.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional, observational, multi-centre study comprising a single visit was conducted in multiple specialised asthma centres and general practices in Germany. A total of 300 patients completed the following measures: 1) Patient Sociodemographic and Clinical Questionnaire, 2) AIRQ, 3) Asthma Control Test (ACT), and 4) Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-6). Logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the AIRQ score cut points with the greatest predictive validity in discriminating between different control levels relative to a standard of ACT plus prior-year exacerbations or ACQ-6 plus prior-year exacerbations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The German version of the AIRQ demonstrated a robust capability to correctly identify well-controlled versus not well- or very poorly controlled (AUC values of 0.90 or higher) and well- or not well-controlled versus very poorly controlled asthma (AUC values of 0.89 or higher).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The German version of the AIRQ is a suitable tool to identify adults with varying levels of asthma control, which in turn can help to accurately identify patients with uncontrolled asthma in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":20197,"journal":{"name":"Pneumologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pneumologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2346-9840","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Asthma Impairment and Risk Questionnaire (AIRQ), a 10-item, equally weighted, yes/no tool assessing symptom impairment and risk of exacerbations in patients with asthma aged ≥12 years, was developed and validated in a US patient population to evaluate varying levels of asthma control. This study aimed to validate the German language version of the AIRQ in patients aged ≥12 years with different levels of asthma control.

Methods: A cross-sectional, observational, multi-centre study comprising a single visit was conducted in multiple specialised asthma centres and general practices in Germany. A total of 300 patients completed the following measures: 1) Patient Sociodemographic and Clinical Questionnaire, 2) AIRQ, 3) Asthma Control Test (ACT), and 4) Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-6). Logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the AIRQ score cut points with the greatest predictive validity in discriminating between different control levels relative to a standard of ACT plus prior-year exacerbations or ACQ-6 plus prior-year exacerbations.

Results: The German version of the AIRQ demonstrated a robust capability to correctly identify well-controlled versus not well- or very poorly controlled (AUC values of 0.90 or higher) and well- or not well-controlled versus very poorly controlled asthma (AUC values of 0.89 or higher).

Conclusions: The German version of the AIRQ is a suitable tool to identify adults with varying levels of asthma control, which in turn can help to accurately identify patients with uncontrolled asthma in clinical practice.

德文版哮喘损害和风险问卷(AIRQ)的验证。
背景:哮喘损害和风险问卷(AIRQ)是一种评估年龄≥12岁的哮喘患者的症状损害和病情恶化风险的10个项目、权重相同的是/否工具,该问卷是在美国患者群体中开发和验证的,用于评估不同的哮喘控制水平。本研究旨在对不同哮喘控制水平的≥12岁患者进行德语版AIRQ的验证:方法:在德国多个哮喘专科中心和全科诊所开展了一项横断面、观察性、多中心研究,包括一次就诊。共有 300 名患者完成了以下测量:1)患者社会人口学和临床问卷;2)AIRQ;3)哮喘控制测试(ACT);4)哮喘控制问卷(ACQ-6)。我们进行了逻辑回归分析,以评估相对于 ACT 加前一年哮喘加重或 ACQ-6 加前一年哮喘加重的标准,AIRQ 分数切点在区分不同控制水平方面具有最大的预测效力:德文版 AIRQ 具有强大的能力,可正确识别哮喘控制良好与控制不佳或控制极差(AUC 值为 0.90 或更高),以及哮喘控制良好与控制不佳或控制极差(AUC 值为 0.89 或更高):结论:德文版 AIRQ 是一种合适的工具,可用于识别哮喘控制水平不同的成人,从而有助于在临床实践中准确识别哮喘失控患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pneumologie
Pneumologie RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
416
期刊介绍: Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pneumologie DGP Organ des Deutschen Zentralkomitees zur Bekämpfung der Tuberkulose DZK Organ des Bundesverbandes der Pneumologen BdP Fachärzte für Lungen- und Bronchialheilkunde, Pneumologen und Allergologen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信