Investigating a Novel Two-Bag N-Acetylcysteine Regimen for Acetaminophen Toxicity.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 TOXICOLOGY
Journal of Medical Toxicology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-11 DOI:10.1007/s13181-024-01010-3
Kathryn A Glass, Zachary R Stoecker, Jenna LeRoy, Casey L Palmer, Jordan Stipek, Sean Boley
{"title":"Investigating a Novel Two-Bag N-Acetylcysteine Regimen for Acetaminophen Toxicity.","authors":"Kathryn A Glass, Zachary R Stoecker, Jenna LeRoy, Casey L Palmer, Jordan Stipek, Sean Boley","doi":"10.1007/s13181-024-01010-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acetaminophen toxicity remains one of the most common causes of liver failure and is treated with a course of n-acetylcysteine (NAC). This exceptionally effective medication is traditionally administered using a complicated three-bag protocol that is prone to administration errors.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to assess whether switching to a novel two-bag protocol (150 mg/kg over 1 h followed by 150 mg/kg over 20 h) reduced administration errors while not increasing liver injury or anaphylactoid reactions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective chart review of hospital encounters for patients with acetaminophen toxicity, comparing outcomes before and after the change from a three-bag protocol to a two-bag protocol at two affiliated institutions. The primary outcome was incidence of medication errors with secondary outcomes including acute liver injury (ALI) and incidence of non-anaphylactoid allergic reactions (NAAR). The study was approved by the health system's Institutional Review Board.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>483 encounters were included for analysis (239 in the three-bag and 244 in the two-bag groups). NAAR were identified in 11 patients with no difference seen between groups. Similarly, no differences were seen in ALI. Medication administration errors were observed significantly less often in the two-bag group (OR 0.24) after adjusting for confounders.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Transitioning to a novel two-bag NAC regimen decreased administration errors. This adds to the literature that two-bag NAC regimens are not only safe but also may have significant benefits over the traditional NAC protocol.</p>","PeriodicalId":16429,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11436688/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13181-024-01010-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acetaminophen toxicity remains one of the most common causes of liver failure and is treated with a course of n-acetylcysteine (NAC). This exceptionally effective medication is traditionally administered using a complicated three-bag protocol that is prone to administration errors.

Objective: We aimed to assess whether switching to a novel two-bag protocol (150 mg/kg over 1 h followed by 150 mg/kg over 20 h) reduced administration errors while not increasing liver injury or anaphylactoid reactions.

Methods: This was a retrospective chart review of hospital encounters for patients with acetaminophen toxicity, comparing outcomes before and after the change from a three-bag protocol to a two-bag protocol at two affiliated institutions. The primary outcome was incidence of medication errors with secondary outcomes including acute liver injury (ALI) and incidence of non-anaphylactoid allergic reactions (NAAR). The study was approved by the health system's Institutional Review Board.

Results: 483 encounters were included for analysis (239 in the three-bag and 244 in the two-bag groups). NAAR were identified in 11 patients with no difference seen between groups. Similarly, no differences were seen in ALI. Medication administration errors were observed significantly less often in the two-bag group (OR 0.24) after adjusting for confounders.

Conclusion: Transitioning to a novel two-bag NAC regimen decreased administration errors. This adds to the literature that two-bag NAC regimens are not only safe but also may have significant benefits over the traditional NAC protocol.

研究治疗对乙酰氨基酚毒性的新型双囊 N-乙酰半胱氨酸疗法
背景:对乙酰氨基酚中毒仍是肝功能衰竭最常见的原因之一,通常采用正乙酰半胱氨酸(NAC)治疗。这种非常有效的药物传统上使用复杂的三袋方案,容易出现用药错误:我们旨在评估改用新型双袋方案(1 小时内 150 毫克/千克,然后 20 小时内 150 毫克/千克)是否能减少用药错误,同时不增加肝损伤或过敏性反应:这是一项对对乙酰氨基酚中毒患者在医院就诊情况的回顾性病历审查,比较了两家附属医院将三袋方案改为两袋方案前后的结果。主要结果是用药错误发生率,次要结果包括急性肝损伤(ALI)和非过敏性过敏反应(NAAR)发生率。该研究获得了医疗系统机构审查委员会的批准:共纳入 483 例病例进行分析(三袋组 239 例,两袋组 244 例)。在 11 名患者中发现了 NAAR,组间无差异。同样,在 ALI 方面也未发现差异。在对混杂因素进行调整后,双袋组出现用药错误的频率明显降低(OR 0.24):结论:过渡到新型双袋 NAC 方案可减少用药错误。结论:过渡到新型双袋 NAC 方案可减少用药错误,这进一步说明双袋 NAC 方案不仅安全,而且与传统 NAC 方案相比具有显著优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
10.30%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Toxicology (JMT) is a peer-reviewed medical journal dedicated to advances in clinical toxicology, focusing on the diagnosis, management, and prevention of poisoning and other adverse health effects resulting from medications, chemicals, occupational and environmental substances, and biological hazards. As the official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology (ACMT), JMT is managed by an editorial board of clinicians as well as scientists and thus publishes research that is relevant to medical toxicologists, emergency physicians, critical care specialists, pediatricians, pre-hospital providers, occupational physicians, substance abuse experts, veterinary toxicologists, and policy makers.       JMT articles generate considerable interest in the lay media, with 2016 JMT articles cited by various social media sites, the Boston Globe, and the Washington Post among others.     For questions or comments about the journal, please contact jmtinfo@acmt.net.    For questions or comments about the journal, please contact jmtinfo@acmt.net.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信