Staff and client preferences for the design and delivery of an outcomes monitoring system in a mental health service.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Philip J Batterham, Melonie Martin, Alison L Calear, Nicolas Cherbuin, Madeline Romaniuk, Michelle Banfield, Peter Butterworth, Michael Burvill, Daniel Massang
{"title":"Staff and client preferences for the design and delivery of an outcomes monitoring system in a mental health service.","authors":"Philip J Batterham, Melonie Martin, Alison L Calear, Nicolas Cherbuin, Madeline Romaniuk, Michelle Banfield, Peter Butterworth, Michael Burvill, Daniel Massang","doi":"10.1111/jep.14085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Outcome monitoring can support the delivery of quality service that meets the needs of clients, clinicians and services. However, few studies have examined client or staff perspectives on the design and implementation of outcomes monitoring within a service. Implementation of outcomes monitoring requires understanding the preferences and expectations of relevant stakeholders.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, this study aimed to investigate the preferences and priorities of relevant staff, clients and family members to inform the design and implementation of an effective outcomes monitoring system in the context of a mental health service for military veterans and their families.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twenty-nine staff participated across five online focus groups, including clinical staff, peer workers, policy staff and supervisors. Ten clients participated in online or telephone semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis was used to develop themes from the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clients and staff agreed that outcomes monitoring should cover more than symptoms, particularly by incorporating functional outcomes. Assessing mental health over time was considered a valuable tool for supporting treatment processes and providing actionable information. Challenges identified by clients and staff included the need for efficient processes, ensuring measures are relevant and acceptable, and maintaining client privacy. The ability to personalise data collection and have a streamlined, responsive system were key attributes of a quality outcomes monitoring framework.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest that an effective outcome monitoring framework should be client-led, tailored to the individual's needs, and provide feedback on progress. Outcomes monitoring should also be efficient, accessible and allow for safe information sharing.</p>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.14085","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Outcome monitoring can support the delivery of quality service that meets the needs of clients, clinicians and services. However, few studies have examined client or staff perspectives on the design and implementation of outcomes monitoring within a service. Implementation of outcomes monitoring requires understanding the preferences and expectations of relevant stakeholders.

Objective: Informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, this study aimed to investigate the preferences and priorities of relevant staff, clients and family members to inform the design and implementation of an effective outcomes monitoring system in the context of a mental health service for military veterans and their families.

Method: Twenty-nine staff participated across five online focus groups, including clinical staff, peer workers, policy staff and supervisors. Ten clients participated in online or telephone semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis was used to develop themes from the data.

Results: Clients and staff agreed that outcomes monitoring should cover more than symptoms, particularly by incorporating functional outcomes. Assessing mental health over time was considered a valuable tool for supporting treatment processes and providing actionable information. Challenges identified by clients and staff included the need for efficient processes, ensuring measures are relevant and acceptable, and maintaining client privacy. The ability to personalise data collection and have a streamlined, responsive system were key attributes of a quality outcomes monitoring framework.

Conclusions: Findings suggest that an effective outcome monitoring framework should be client-led, tailored to the individual's needs, and provide feedback on progress. Outcomes monitoring should also be efficient, accessible and allow for safe information sharing.

在心理健康服务中设计和实施成果监测系统时工作人员和客户的偏好。
背景:成果监测可以支持提供优质服务,满足客户、临床医生和服务机构的需求。然而,很少有研究从服务对象或员工的角度来探讨服务成果监测的设计和实施。实施结果监控需要了解相关利益者的偏好和期望:本研究以 "实施研究综合框架 "为基础,旨在调查相关工作人员、客户和家庭成员的偏好和优先事项,为在退伍军人及其家人的心理健康服务中设计和实施有效的结果监控系统提供信息:29 名工作人员参加了五个在线焦点小组,其中包括临床工作人员、同伴工作者、政策工作人员和主管。10 名客户参加了在线或电话半结构化访谈。采用主题分析法从数据中提取主题:受助者和工作人员一致认为,结果监测应涵盖症状以外的内容,特别是通过纳入功能性结果。随着时间的推移对心理健康进行评估被认为是支持治疗过程和提供可操作信息的重要工具。受试者和工作人员提出的挑战包括:需要高效的流程、确保测量的相关性和可接受性,以及维护受试者的隐私。个性化数据收集的能力以及精简、反应迅速的系统是优质结果监测框架的关键属性:研究结果表明,有效的成果监测框架应以客户为主导,根据个人需求量身定制,并提供进展反馈。成果监测还应高效、方便,并允许安全的信息共享。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信