Selection Criteria in the Era of Perfect Competition for Drug-Eluting Stents in Association With Operator Volumes: An Operator-Volume Analysis of the Selection DES Study.

IF 1.4 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Cardiology Research Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-25 DOI:10.14740/cr1651
Satoru Hashimoto, Yoshihiro Motozawa, Toshiki Mano
{"title":"Selection Criteria in the Era of Perfect Competition for Drug-Eluting Stents in Association With Operator Volumes: An Operator-Volume Analysis of the Selection DES Study.","authors":"Satoru Hashimoto, Yoshihiro Motozawa, Toshiki Mano","doi":"10.14740/cr1651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to explore the factors influencing the drug-eluting stent (DES) selection criteria of cardiologists in association with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) volumes and to determine whether they value further DES improvements and modifications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The survey was conducted on a group of cardiologist operators from April 10 to 30, 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 126 operators who answered the questions. Of these, low-, intermediate-, and high-volume operators accounted for 49 (38.9%), 47 (37.3%), and 30 (23.8%), respectively. Overall, Xience™ everolimus-eluting stent (CoCr-EES) was most frequently used, with > 70% of cardiologists using it in > 20% of their PCI practice. The percentage of selection by low-, intermediate-, and high-volume operators among the DESs used demonstrated no difference, except for dual-therapy sirolimus-eluting and CD34<sup>+</sup> antibody-coated Combo<sup>®</sup> stent (DTS). Logistic regression analysis revealed that low-volume operators are less likely to be affected in terms of company/sales representative (odds ratio (OR): 0.402, P = 0.031) and bending lesions (OR: 0.339, P = 0.037) for selecting DES. Low-volume operators less frequently selected Resolute Onyx™ zotarolimus-eluting stents (OR: 0.689, P = 0.043) and DTS (Drug-Eluting Stents) (OR: 0.361, P = 0.006) for PCI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current study results indicate that patient background, DES performance, and product specifications were not criteria for DES selection in cardiologists with different PCI volumes in routine PCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":9424,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology Research","volume":"15 3","pages":"189-197"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11236343/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14740/cr1651","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to explore the factors influencing the drug-eluting stent (DES) selection criteria of cardiologists in association with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) volumes and to determine whether they value further DES improvements and modifications.

Methods: The survey was conducted on a group of cardiologist operators from April 10 to 30, 2023.

Results: The analysis included 126 operators who answered the questions. Of these, low-, intermediate-, and high-volume operators accounted for 49 (38.9%), 47 (37.3%), and 30 (23.8%), respectively. Overall, Xience™ everolimus-eluting stent (CoCr-EES) was most frequently used, with > 70% of cardiologists using it in > 20% of their PCI practice. The percentage of selection by low-, intermediate-, and high-volume operators among the DESs used demonstrated no difference, except for dual-therapy sirolimus-eluting and CD34+ antibody-coated Combo® stent (DTS). Logistic regression analysis revealed that low-volume operators are less likely to be affected in terms of company/sales representative (odds ratio (OR): 0.402, P = 0.031) and bending lesions (OR: 0.339, P = 0.037) for selecting DES. Low-volume operators less frequently selected Resolute Onyx™ zotarolimus-eluting stents (OR: 0.689, P = 0.043) and DTS (Drug-Eluting Stents) (OR: 0.361, P = 0.006) for PCI.

Conclusions: The current study results indicate that patient background, DES performance, and product specifications were not criteria for DES selection in cardiologists with different PCI volumes in routine PCI.

药物洗脱支架完美竞争时代的选择标准与手术量的关系:选择 DES 研究的手术量分析。
背景:本研究旨在探讨影响心脏病专家药物洗脱支架(DES)选择标准的因素与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)量的关系,并确定他们是否重视DES的进一步改进和修改:方法:于2023年4月10日至30日对一组心脏病医生操作者进行了调查:分析包括 126 名回答问题的操作员。其中,低量、中量和高量操作者分别占 49 人(38.9%)、47 人(37.3%)和 30 人(23.8%)。总体而言,Xience™依维莫司洗脱支架(CoCr-EES)的使用率最高,超过 70% 的心脏病专家在其 20% 以上的 PCI 实践中使用该支架。除了双治疗西罗莫司洗脱和 CD34+ 抗体涂层 Combo® 支架 (DTS) 外,低、中、高流量操作者选择 DES 的比例没有差异。逻辑回归分析表明,低产量操作者在选择DES时较少受到公司/销售代表(几率比(OR):0.402,P = 0.031)和弯曲病变(OR:0.339,P = 0.037)的影响。低容量操作者较少选择Resolute Onyx™ zotarolimus洗脱支架(OR:0.689,P = 0.043)和DTS(药物洗脱支架)(OR:0.361,P = 0.006)进行PCI:目前的研究结果表明,在常规PCI中,患者背景、DES性能和产品规格并不是不同PCI量的心脏病专家选择DES的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiology Research
Cardiology Research CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Cardiology Research is an open access, peer-reviewed, international journal. All submissions relating to basic research and clinical practice of cardiology and cardiovascular medicine are in this journal''s scope. This journal focuses on publishing original research and observations in all cardiovascular medicine aspects. Manuscript types include original article, review, case report, short communication, book review, letter to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信