Disparity in the Under-Utilization of Novel P2Y12 Inhibitors in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

IF 1.4 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Cardiology Research Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-25 DOI:10.14740/cr1528
Chad Nicholson, Maxim Zlatopolsky, Jared Steinberger, Jacob Alex, Marcel Zughaib
{"title":"Disparity in the Under-Utilization of Novel P2Y12 Inhibitors in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.","authors":"Chad Nicholson, Maxim Zlatopolsky, Jared Steinberger, Jacob Alex, Marcel Zughaib","doi":"10.14740/cr1528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The most recent guidelines (European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA)) all favor prasugrel/ticagrelor over clopidogrel in the setting of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We therefore sought to investigate which P2Y12 inhibitors were being prescribed in our community hospital setting upon discharge among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the setting of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified patients presenting to two Metro Detroit Michigan hospitals with STEMI between January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2021 using the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium (BMC2) PCI registry. The primary outcome was the choice of P2Y12 inhibitor prescribed on day of discharge following hospitalization for STEMI, and baseline characteristics were compared including race, sex and type of insurance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 366 patients presented to these two Metro Detroit hospitals from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2021. Female and non-White patients were more likely to be discharged on clopidogrel than ticagrelor or prasugrel (odds ratio (OR): 1.56, confidence interval (CI): 0.99 - 2.45, and OR: 1.43, CI: 0.91 - 2.25, respectively), however, did not reach statistical significance. Patients without private insurance presenting with STEMI were more likely to be discharged on clopidogrel (OR: 1.83, CI: 1.22 - 2.74), which did reach statistical significance in our cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this retrospective single-center study evaluating BMC2 registry, we demonstrate a clinically significant disparity in prescribing patterns based on insurance, with trends for disparity based on gender and ethnicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":9424,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology Research","volume":"15 3","pages":"129-133"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11236348/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14740/cr1528","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The most recent guidelines (European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA)) all favor prasugrel/ticagrelor over clopidogrel in the setting of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We therefore sought to investigate which P2Y12 inhibitors were being prescribed in our community hospital setting upon discharge among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the setting of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

Methods: We identified patients presenting to two Metro Detroit Michigan hospitals with STEMI between January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2021 using the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium (BMC2) PCI registry. The primary outcome was the choice of P2Y12 inhibitor prescribed on day of discharge following hospitalization for STEMI, and baseline characteristics were compared including race, sex and type of insurance.

Results: A total of 366 patients presented to these two Metro Detroit hospitals from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2021. Female and non-White patients were more likely to be discharged on clopidogrel than ticagrelor or prasugrel (odds ratio (OR): 1.56, confidence interval (CI): 0.99 - 2.45, and OR: 1.43, CI: 0.91 - 2.25, respectively), however, did not reach statistical significance. Patients without private insurance presenting with STEMI were more likely to be discharged on clopidogrel (OR: 1.83, CI: 1.22 - 2.74), which did reach statistical significance in our cohort.

Conclusions: In this retrospective single-center study evaluating BMC2 registry, we demonstrate a clinically significant disparity in prescribing patterns based on insurance, with trends for disparity based on gender and ethnicity.

新型 P2Y12 抑制剂在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 STEV 心肌梗死中使用不足的差异。
背景:最新指南(欧洲心脏病学会 (ESC) 和美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会 (ACC/AHA))均赞成在急性冠状动脉综合征 (ACS) 情况下使用普拉格雷/替卡格雷,而不是氯吡格雷。因此,我们试图调查在社区医院接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者出院时处方的P2Y12抑制剂:我们使用密歇根州蓝十字蓝盾心血管联盟(BMC2)PCI 注册表对 2018 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日期间在密歇根州底特律市两家医院就诊的 STEMI 患者进行了鉴定。主要结果是 STEMI 患者住院后出院当天处方 P2Y12 抑制剂的选择,并比较了种族、性别和保险类型等基线特征:从2018年1月1日至2021年12月31日,共有366名患者在这两家底特律大都会医院就诊。与替卡格雷或普拉格雷相比,女性和非白人患者更有可能使用氯吡格雷出院(几率比(OR):1.56,置信区间(CI):0.99 - 2.45;OR:1.43,CI:0.91 - 2.25,分别为1.56和1.43),但未达到统计学意义。没有私人保险的 STEMI 患者出院时更有可能使用氯吡格雷(OR:1.83,CI:1.22 - 2.74),这在我们的队列中具有统计学意义:在这项对 BMC2 登记进行评估的单中心回顾性研究中,我们证明了基于保险的处方模式在临床上存在显著差异,而且基于性别和种族的差异也呈上升趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiology Research
Cardiology Research CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Cardiology Research is an open access, peer-reviewed, international journal. All submissions relating to basic research and clinical practice of cardiology and cardiovascular medicine are in this journal''s scope. This journal focuses on publishing original research and observations in all cardiovascular medicine aspects. Manuscript types include original article, review, case report, short communication, book review, letter to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信